Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education

To better understand their perceptions of optimal tools and strategies for success, this research analyzed the experiences of learners and instructors in an online distance education environment. A qualitative constant comparative analysis methodology supported by an appropriate conceptual framework guided the study. Data were collected over multiple years and from multiple stakeholders. The study identified the following significant conclusions: the availability of multiple tools added flexibility to the learning environment; technology tools should appeal to multiple learning styles; collaboration, reflection, and building a learning community were important strategies supported by multiple tools; and participant satisfaction, appropriate prerequisite skills, and faculty and administrative involvement ensured programmatic success. According to this study, optimal distance education environments should address factors identified in the conceptual framework.

[1]  Tiong Kung-Ming,et al.  Asynchronous vs. Synchronous Interaction , 2005 .

[2]  Hock Chuan Chan,et al.  Critical success factors for on-line course resources , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[3]  T. J. Peters,et al.  The Circle of Innovation : You Can't Shrink Your Way to Greatness , 1999 .

[4]  Michael P. Menchaca,et al.  RESEARCH ON INTERNET-SUPPORTED LEARNING A Review , 2008 .

[5]  Rajiv Vaidyanathan,et al.  Dictionary of statistics and methodology : #a #nontechnical guide for the social sciences , 1994 .

[6]  Zheng Yan,et al.  Different experiences, different effects: a longitudinal study of learning a computer program in a network environment , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  David D. Thornburg,et al.  Campfires in Cyberspace: Primordial Metaphors for Learning in the 21st Century. , 2001 .

[8]  Judith Gal-Ezer,et al.  Skills required for participating in CMC courses: An empirical study , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[9]  D. Weaver,et al.  Academic and student use of a learning management system: Implications for quality , 2008 .

[10]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  e-Learning: The student experience , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[11]  P. Drucker.  Managing for the Future: The 1990s and Beyond , 1992 .

[12]  David Stewart,et al.  Focus groups: Theory and practice, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[13]  Richard E. Morehouse,et al.  Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide , 1994 .

[14]  Ronald A. Phipps,et al.  Assuring quality in distance learning a preliminary review , 1998 .

[15]  Pablo Romero,et al.  Debugging strategies and tactics in a multi-representation software environment , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[17]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Distance Education and Distributed Learning. Current Perspectives on Applied Information Technologies. , 2002 .

[18]  Sari Rissanen,et al.  Online Learning Experiences of University Students , 2009 .

[19]  Alison A. Carr-Chellman,et al.  The Ideal Online Course , 2000, Libr. Trends.

[20]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Growing by Degrees: Online Education in the United States, 2005. , 2005 .

[21]  W. Paul Vogt,et al.  The SAGE Dictionary of Statistics & Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences , 2015 .

[22]  D. Cohen.  Chronicle of Higher Education , 1998 .

[23]  K. Hambridge.  Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[24]  David M. Fetterman,et al.  Empowerment Evaluation , 2007 .

[25]  Jay Cross,et al.  The future of eLearning , 2004 .

[26]  Susan Imel,et al.  E-Learning. Trends and Issues Alert. , 2002 .

[27]  R. ul-Haq.  Managing for the future‐the 1990's and beyond, Peter F. Drucker, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 1992, 281 pp, £ 16.95, ISBN 0 7506 0492 1 , 1993 .

[28]  Chris Dede,et al.  Enabling Distributed Learning Communities via Emerging Technologies--Part One. , 2004 .

[29]  Berit Östlund.  Prerequisites for interactive learning in distance education: Perspectives from Swedish students , 2008 .

[30]  Chris Dede,et al.  The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning , 1996 .

[31]  Pei-Chun Shih,et al.  The effect of previous experience with information and communication technologies on performance in a Web-based learning program , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Van Dusen,et al.  The Virtual Campus: Technology and Reform in Higher Education. ERIC Digest. , 1997 .

[33]  Mark Bullen,et al.  What’s the Difference: A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education by Ronald Phipps and Jamie Merisotis , 1999 .

[34]  Som Naidu,et al.  Evaluating Distance Education and E-Learning , 2005 .

[35]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Focus Groups: Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[36]  Chris Dede,et al.  Learning with Technology , 1998 .

[37]  Keenan A. Pituch,et al.  The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Esther Dyson,et al.  Release 2.0: A Design for Living in the Digital Age , 1998 .

[39]  M. S. de Vries,et al.  -- [Review of: D.M. Fetterman, S.J. Kaftarian (1997) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self Assessment and Accountability] , 1997 .

[40]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Jason D. Baker,et al.  Faculty Support Systems , 2005 .

[42]  Guglielmo Trentin,et al.  The evaluation of online courses , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[43]  G. Fletcher.  The Future of E-Learning , 2004 .

[44]  David M. Fetterman,et al.  Empowerment evaluation : knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability , 1996 .

[45]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[46]  Lei-da Chen,et al.  Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Graeme Salter,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Educational Technology , 2005 .

[48]  James E. Novitzki,et al.  Necessities for Effective Asynchronous Learning , 2005 .

[49]  E. Allen,et al.  Entering the Mainstream: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United State , 2004 .