How Does Science Learning Occur in the Classroom? Students’ Perceptions of Science Instruction During the Implementation of the REAPS Model

In this qualitative study the researchers explored children’s perceptions of their participation in a science class in which an elementary science curriculum, the Full Option Science System (FOSS), was combined with an innovative teaching model, Real Engagement in Active Problem Solving (REAPS). The children were capable of articulating views about their learning experiences during science classes. Meaningful experiences with deep levels of engagement were those that involved hands-on activities, such as experiments, provided by the FOSS curriculum; and problem-solving and model building, which were components of the REAPS model. Students’ perceptions demonstrated in their drawings were similar to their interviews, which were evidence of their meaningful science learning experiences. Incorporating students’ voices, as a type of feedback for teaching and learning, is important for teachers and practitioners; innovative pedagogical models contribute to meaningful and long-lasting science learning.

[1]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[2]  Martin Braund,et al.  Pupils' perceptions of practical science in primary and secondary school: implications for improving progression and continuity of learning , 2005 .

[3]  J. Potter,et al.  Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour , 1987 .

[4]  Ellen Winner,et al.  The Art of Children's Drawing , 1988 .

[5]  F. Pozuelos,et al.  Inquiry‐based teaching: teachers’ conceptions, impediments and support , 2010 .

[6]  Susan J. Rehorek.  Inquiry-Based Teaching: An Example of Descriptive Science in Action. , 2004 .

[7]  Ken Appleton,et al.  How Do Beginning Primary School Teachers Cope with Science? Toward an Understanding of Science Teaching Practice , 2003 .

[8]  Carolynne Mason,et al.  Problematising pupil voice using visual methods: findings from a study of engaged and disaffected pupils in an urban secondary school , 2011 .

[9]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Students' Understanding of the Objectives and Procedures of Experimentation in the Science Classroom , 1995 .

[10]  Julia Flutter.  Teacher development and pupil voice , 2007 .

[11]  C. J. Maker,et al.  Problem Solving in a Complex World: Integrating DISCOVER, TASC, and PBL in a Teacher Education Project , 2008 .

[12]  Charlene M. Czerniak,et al.  Assessing Teachers' Beliefs about Their Science Teaching Context , 2000 .

[13]  Cheryl L. Mason,et al.  Student attitudes toward science and sciencerelated careers: A program designed to promote a stimulating gender-free learning environment , 1989 .

[14]  A F Maeland,et al.  Handwriting and Perceptual-Motor Skills in Clumsy, Dysgraphic, and ‘Normal’ Children , 1992, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  Michael W. Metzler,et al.  Instructional Models for Physical Education , 2011 .

[16]  Dana L. Mitra,et al.  The Significance of Students: Can Increasing Student Voice in Schools Lead to Gains in Youth Development?. , 2004 .

[17]  D. Chambers,et al.  Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw‐a‐scientist test , 1983 .

[18]  Marian J Jongmans,et al.  Handwriting difficulties in primary school children: a search for underlying mechanisms. , 2006, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[19]  P. Morrissette,et al.  Effective Interviewing of Children: A Comprehensive Guide for Counselors and Human Service Workers , 2013 .

[20]  Derek C. Briggs,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching , 2012 .

[21]  Peter Aubusson,et al.  A Trial of the Five Es: A Referent Model for Constructivist Teaching and Learning , 2003 .

[22]  B. Wallace.  The early seedbed of the growth of TASC: Thinking Actively in a Social Context , 2008 .

[23]  Mridula D. Ranade.  Development of CAI Presentations for Science Teaching and Overview of Research Findings , 2006 .

[24]  Judy L. Reinoso.  Real-Life Problem Solving: Examining the Effects of Alcohol Within a Community on the Navajo Nation , 2011 .

[25]  M. Fullan.  The New Meaning of Educational Change , 1990 .

[26]  Brent D. Ruben,et al.  Simulations, Games, and Experience-Based Learning: The Quest for a New Paradigm for Teaching and Learning , 1999 .

[27]  M. Araceli Ruiz-Primo,et al.  Examining Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool , 2004 .

[28]  M. R. Matthews.  Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science , 1994 .

[29]  Marilyn Cochran-Smith.  Learning and unlearning: the education of teacher educators , 2003 .

[30]  Norman K. Denzin,et al.  Strategies of Multiple Triangulation , 2017 .

[31]  P. Barker.  Clinical interviews with children and adolescents , 1991, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[32]  Edgar W. Jenkins,et al.  The Student Voice and School Science Education , 2006 .

[33]  Jon E. Pedersen,et al.  Validating the Draw-A-Science-Teacher-Test Checklist (DASTT-C): Exploring Mental Models and Teacher Beliefs , 2001 .

[34]  J. Davis.  The What and the Whether of the U: Cultural Implications of Understanding Development in Graphic Symbolization. , 1997 .

[35]  Jean Rudduck,et al.  Consulting Pupils: What's In It For Schools? , 2004 .

[36]  S. Simon,et al.  Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications , 2003 .

[37]  E. Glasersfeld.  An Introduction to Radical Constructivism , 1981 .

[38]  Patricia M. Stohr-Hunt.  An analysis of frequency of hands‐on experience and science achievement , 1996 .

[39]  A. W. Blöte,et al.  A Longitudinal Study on Dysgraphic Handwriting in Primary School , 1993, Journal of learning disabilities.

[40]  Joseph D. Novak.  The Content of Science: A Constructivist Approach to its Teaching and Learning.Peter J. Fensham , Richard F. Gunstone , Richard T. White , 1995 .

[41]  Makeba Jones,et al.  Using Students’ Voices To Inform And Evaluate Secondary School Reform , 2007 .

[42]  C. June Maker,et al.  Developing Real-Life Problem Solving , 2015 .

[43]  Audrey B. Champagne,et al.  The National Science Education Standards. , 2000 .

[44]  Bruce Wilson,et al.  Students’ Perspectives on Good Teaching: Implications for Adult Reform Behavior , 2007 .

[45]  S. Cermak,et al.  Fine motor activities in elementary school: preliminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor problems. , 1992, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[46]  J. Osborne,et al.  Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study , 2001 .

[47]  Effectiveness of Ninth-Grade Physics in Maine: Conceptual Understanding , 2009, 0901.4692.

[48]  Transforming Elementary Science Teacher Education by Bridging Formal and Informal Science Education in an Innovative Science Methods Course , 2011 .

[49]  Kristin Powell,et al.  The Effectiveness of Three Experiential Teaching Approaches on Student Science Learning in Fifth-Grade Public School Classrooms , 2002 .

[50]  Cathy A. Malchiodi,et al.  Understanding Children's Drawings , 1998 .

[51]  Pamela R. Aschbacher,et al.  Fifth Graders' Science Inquiry Abilities: A Comparative Study of Students in Hands-On and Textbook Curricula. , 2006 .

[52]  Shelagh A. Gallagher,et al.  Problem-Based Learning: Where Did it Come from, What Does it Do, and Where is it Going? , 1997 .

[53]  L. Resnick,et al.  Mathematics and Science Learning: A New Conception , 1983, Science.

[54]  S. Barab,et al.  Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation , 2003 .

[55]  Polly Björk-Willén.  Routine Trouble: How Preschool Children Participate in Multilingual Instruction , 2008 .

[56]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  The Content Of Science: A Constructive Approach To Its Teaching And Learning , 1994 .

[57]  R. Leitch,et al.  Caged birds and cloning machines: how student imagery ‘speaks’ to us about cultures of schooling and student participation , 2007 .