Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare

Abstract The nascent adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the public sector is being assessed in contradictory ways. But while there is increasing speculation about both its dangers and its benefits, there is very little empirical research to substantiate them. This study aims at mapping the challenges in the adoption of AI in the public sector as perceived by key stakeholders. Drawing on the theoretical lens of framing, we analyse a case of adoption of the AI system IBM Watson in public healthcare in China, to map how three groups of stakeholders (government policy-makers, hospital managers/doctors, and Information Technology (IT) firm managers) perceive the challenges of AI adoption in the public sector. Findings show that different stakeholders have diverse, and sometimes contradictory, framings of the challenges. We contribute to research by providing an empirical basis to claims of AI challenges in the public sector, and to practice by providing four sets of guidelines for the governance of AI adoption in the public sector.

[1]  Rezaul K. Begg.  Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Medicine and Healthcare , 2005, Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology.

[2]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[3]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Inconsistent and Incongruent Frames During IT-enabled Change: An Action Research Study into Sales Process Innovation , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  Social media in public health care: Impact domain propositions , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Innovation Blindness: Culture, Frames and Cross-Boundary Problem Construction in the Development of New Technology Concepts , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[6]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  A social representations perspective on information systems implementation: Rethinking the concept of "frames" , 2008, Inf. Technol. People.

[7]  Anneke Zuiderwijk,et al.  Open innovation in the public sector: A research agenda , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  A Rhetorical Approach to IT Diffusion: Reconceptualizing the Ideology-Framing Relationship in Computerization Movements , 2013, MIS Q..

[9]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Big and Open Linked Data (BOLD) in government: A challenge to transparency and privacy? , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Pamela McCorduck,et al.  Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence , 1979 .

[11]  Gary B. Smith,et al.  Reducing the number and impact of outbreaks of nosocomial viral gastroenteritis: time-series analysis of a multidimensional quality improvement initiative , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[12]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[14]  Adegboyega Ojo,et al.  Deploying governance networks for societal challenges , 2016, Government Information Quarterly.

[15]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Thinking About Technology: Applying a Cognitive Lens to Technical Change , 2008 .

[16]  Zhenbin Yang,et al.  Workarounds in the use of IS in healthcare: A case study of an electronic medication administration system , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[18]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  K. Glaister,et al.  Breaking the frame: an analysis of strategic cognition and decision making under uncertainty , 1999 .

[20]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[21]  Lei Zheng,et al.  Towards a typology of adaptive governance in the digital government context: The role of decision-making and accountability , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[23]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  "You can't make this a science!" - Analyzing decision support systems in political contexts , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[25]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Putting Framing in Perspective: A Review of Framing and Frame Analysis across the Management and Organizational Literature , 2014 .

[26]  Barney Tan,et al.  Demystifying case research: A structured-pragmatic-situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[27]  Karin Olesen,et al.  Implications of dominant technological frames over a longitudinal period , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[28]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[29]  K. Gulson,et al.  Mapping an emergent field of ‘computational education policy’: Policy rationalities, prediction and data in the age of Artificial Intelligence , 2017 .

[30]  Gregory S. Parnell,et al.  Framing Strategic Decisions , 1998 .

[31]  Yejin Choi,et al.  Where Not to Eat? Improving Public Policy by Predicting Hygiene Inspections Using Online Reviews , 2013, EMNLP.

[32]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[33]  Spyros Makridakis,et al.  The Forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) Revolution: Its Impact on Society and Firms , 2017 .

[34]  Dvora Yanow,et al.  From Policy “Frames” to “Framing” , 2016 .

[35]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies, 1st Edition , 2014 .

[36]  J. Carbonell,et al.  The role of metaphors in the development of technologies. The case of the artificial intelligence , 2016 .

[37]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Electronic government: information management capacity, organizational capabilities, and the sourcing mix , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Civic open data at a crossroads: Dominant models and current challenges , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  Shanlian Hu,et al.  Reform of how health care is paid for in China: challenges and opportunities , 2008, The Lancet.

[40]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Information flows and smart disclosure of financial data: A framework for identifying challenges of cross boundary information sharing , 2014, Government Information Quarterly.

[41]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Frame Reflection: Toward The Resolution Of Intractable Policy Controversies , 1994 .

[42]  Roman Batko,et al.  Strategic Imperatives and Core Competencies in the Era of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence , 2017 .

[43]  Maha Shaikh,et al.  Negotiating open source software adoption in the UK public sector , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[44]  Brian A. Jacob,et al.  Can You Recognize an Effective Teacher When You Recruit One? , 2008, Education Finance and Policy.

[45]  Peer C. Fiss,et al.  The Symbolic Management of Strategic Change: Sensegiving Via Framing and Decoupling , 2006 .

[46]  Xuejiao Zhao,et al.  What factors drive open innovation in China's public sector? A case study of official document exchange via microblogging (ODEM) in Haining , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[47]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  ICT for Governance and Policy Modelling: Research Challenges and Future Prospects in Europe , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[48]  Ellen Enkel,et al.  Applied artificial intelligence and trust—The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices , 2016 .

[49]  Melissa Mazmanian.  Avoiding the Trap of Constant Connectivity: When Congruent Frames Allow for Heterogeneous Practices , 2013 .

[50]  Wolfgang Hofkirchner,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of the Web: Cognition, Communication, and Co-Operation. Towards an Understanding of Web 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 , 2010, Future Internet.

[51]  E. Davidson.  A Technological Frames Perspective on Information Technology and Organizational Change , 2006 .

[52]  Michael Chui,et al.  Artificial intelligence: the next digital frontier? , 2017 .

[53]  Lei Zheng,et al.  Social media in Chinese government: Drivers, challenges and capabilities , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[54]  C. Dirican,et al.  The Impacts of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence On Business and Economics , 2015 .

[55]  J. Sillince,et al.  Reversal of strategic change , 2012 .

[56]  Jennifer Chu-Carroll,et al.  Building Watson: An Overview of the DeepQA Project , 2010, AI Mag..

[57]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Making e-Government systems workable: Exploring the evolution of frames , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Martin Ford.  Could artificial intelligence create an unemployment crisis? , 2013, CACM.

[59]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Negotiating "best practices" in package software implementation , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[60]  John A. List,et al.  Predicting and Preventing Shootings among At-Risk Youth , 2011 .