Image analysis system for acquiring three-dimensional contour of foot arch during balanced standing

Compared to the X-ray approach, footprint analysis is a non-radiation and more viable method for clinical assessment of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot. In this study, we have designed an optical footprint acquisition system that consists of a digital camera and two pieces of glass, each with four load cells under each corner. When the subject stands on the transparent force plates, the digital camera is triggered, photographing the soles of the feet at the moment when both feet bear approximately at the same weight. A blue gel is placed between the foot and the force plate to enhance the contrast between sole and background. Based on the relationship between the brightness of the image and the thickness of the gel, the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the arch can be reconstructed which can provide more representative information than a conventional footprint image, with its low resolution and easy smearing.

[1]  Aleksandra Mojsilovic,et al.  Analysis and 3D reconstruction of heterogeneity in malignant brain tumors: an interdisciplinary case study using a novel computational visualization approach. , 2002, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[2]  J. Clement,et al.  The effect of interocclusal appliances on temporomandibular joints as assessed by 3D reconstruction of MRI scans. , 2001, Australian dental journal.

[3]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Network model of shape-from-shading: neural function arises from both receptive and projective fields , 1988, Nature.

[4]  G. Simons.  A standardized method for the radiographic evaluation of clubfeet. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  L. Osternig,et al.  Injuries to runners , 1978, The Journal of sports medicine.

[6]  David W. Polly,et al.  Consistency of Visual Assessments of Arch Height among Clinicians* , 1994, Foot & ankle international.

[7]  J. Cobey,et al.  Standardizing Methods of Measurement of Foot Shape by Including the Effects of Subtalar Rotation , 1981, Foot & ankle.

[8]  T Y Shiang,et al.  Evaluating different footprint parameters as a predictor of arch height. , 1998, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[9]  R. Cailliet,et al.  Foot and ankle pain , 1982 .

[10]  Aly A. Farag,et al.  A 3-D reconstruction system for the human jaw using a sequence of optical images , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  H. Yack,et al.  Anatomy and biomechanics of the first ray. , 1999, Physical therapy.

[12]  L. Staheli,et al.  Measurements on radiographs of the foot in normal infants and children. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  D A Nawoczenski,et al.  Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Raj Shekhar,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of the coronary artery wall by image fusion of intravascular ultrasound and bi-plane angiography , 2000, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[15]  D. Ilstrup,et al.  Radiographic Measurements of the Normal Adult Foot , 1980, Foot & ankle.

[16]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision , 1993, Springer US.

[17]  M A Viergever,et al.  Estimation of the depth-dependent component of the point spread function of SPECT. , 1999, Medical physics.

[18]  G. K. Rose,et al.  The diagnosis of flat foot in the child. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  Corrective shoes and inserts as treatment for flexible flatfoot in infants and children. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Image pre-processing , 1993 .

[21]  Qiang Ji,et al.  Digital imaging colposcopy: corrected area measurements using shape-from-shading , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  A. Simkin,et al.  Role of the calcaneal inclination in the energy storage capacity of the human foot—a biomechanical model , 1990, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[23]  B. Joseph,et al.  The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot. A survey of 1846 skeletally mature persons. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  J. B. Volpon,et al.  Footprint analysis during the growth period. , 1994, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[25]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image processing , 1971 .

[26]  A. Franke,et al.  Bildgebende Verfahren in der Kardiologie: 3D-Echokardiographie , 2000, Zeitschrift für Kardiologie.

[27]  Thomas Kirk Cureton,et al.  The Validity of Footprints as a Measure of Vertical Height of the Arch and Functional Efficiency of the Foot , 1935 .

[28]  U. Kanatlı,et al.  Footprint and Radiographic Analysis of the Feet , 2001, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[29]  B. Jones,et al.  Foot morphologic characteristics and risk of exercise-related injury. , 1993, Archives of family medicine.

[30]  Benno M. Nigg,et al.  Footprint Parameters as a Measure of Arch Height , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[31]  A Simkin,et al.  Combined Effect of Foot Arch Structure and an Orthotic Device on Stress Fractures , 1989, Foot & ankle.

[32]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[33]  U. B. Rao,et al.  The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot. A survey of 2300 children. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[34]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  H. Ranu,et al.  Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques. 2nd Edn , 1992 .