The reality of myoelectric prostheses : how do EMG skill, unpredictability of prosthesis response, and delays impact on user functionality and everyday prosthesis use?

Myoelectric prostheses are designed to provide cosmesis and a degree of upper limb functionality for people with upper limb absence. However, self-reported rejection rates remain stubbornly high, with control of the prosthesis being commonly cited as one of the primary reasons. This observation may indicate that the significant engineering efforts aimed at improving prosthesis control may not have been addressing the most important issues. Surprisingly, there has been no empirical work outside of lab environments to understand the relative importance of key factors affecting prosthesis control. This thesis explores the impacts of three factors: (1) user skill in controlling an EMG signal, (2) unpredictability of prosthesis response introduced at the interface between the electrodes and the skin, and (3) the electromechanical delay in the prosthesis, on user performance, quantified in terms of: (1) functionality (kinematic and gaze), and (2), for the first time, everyday prosthesis use. Chapter 1 introduces the thesis, followed by Chapter 2, which contains a review of existing literature relating to the factors affecting control of myoelectric prostheses. Chapters 3 reports a protocol for the assessment of the impact of skill, unpredictability and delays on user functionality and real world use of a prosthesis. Chapter 4 introduces the first method for the visualisation of time series data from wrist worn accelerometers and presents the first time series data on everyday prosthesis use. Chapter 5 presents results of a study, which recruited 20 trans-radial myoelectric prosthesis users from 6 centres across the UK, drawing conclusions as to the relative impacts of each control factor on performance. Results suggest unpredictability introduced at the electrode-skin interface by the socket mounted electrodes may be the key factor affecting control. Additionally, the results show the delay to the onset of hand opening from a fully closed position to be approximately double the delay measured from any other starting hand aperture. Chapter 6 reports on upper limb activity in the 20 trans-radial prosthesis users and 20 anatomically intact participants. The results show that, by contrast to the anatomically intact participants, upper limb activity of prosthesis users is heavily biased towards the intact limb. Finally Chapter 7 summarises the main findings of the thesis, addressing limitations and suggesting future work.

[1]  Albert H Vette,et al.  Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  Raoul M. Bongers,et al.  Task-Oriented Gaming for Transfer to Prosthesis Use , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Bernard C. K. Choi,et al.  A Catalog of Biases in Questionnaires , 2004, Preventing chronic disease.

[4]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Using accelerometer feedback to identify walking destinations, activity overestimates, and stealth exercise in obese and nonobese individuals. , 2008, Journal of physical activity & health.

[5]  J. Davidson,et al.  Save that arm: A study of problems in the remaining arm of unilateral upper limb amputees , 1999, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[6]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee , 2004, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[7]  Raoul M. Bongers,et al.  Learning an EMG Controlled Game: Task-Specific Adaptations and Transfer , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  D. F. Lovely Signals and Signal Processing for Myoelectric Control , 2004 .

[9]  C. Lang,et al.  Does Task-Specific Training Improve Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Poststroke? , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[10]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Quantifying nonuse in chronic stroke patients: a study into paretic, nonparetic, and bimanual upper-limb use in daily life. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  D S Childress,et al.  Digital approaches to myoelectric state control of prostheses. , 1981, Bulletin of prosthetics research.

[12]  Peter J. Kyberd,et al.  A Critical Review of Functionality Assessment in Natural and Prosthetic Hands , 1999 .

[13]  R. Whelan Effective Analysis of Reaction Time Data , 2008 .

[14]  P. Rossini,et al.  Intraneural stimulation elicits discrimination of textural features by artificial fingertip in intact and amputee humans , 2016, eLife.

[15]  D. Atkins,et al.  Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities , 1996 .

[16]  Raoul M. Bongers,et al.  Virtual Training of the Myosignal , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  P J Kyberd,et al.  The population of users of upper limb prostheses attending the Oxford Limb Fitting Service , 1997, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[18]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  F. Luthi,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the French version of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales—Revised (TAPES-R) , 2020, PloS one.

[20]  Mohammad Sobuh,et al.  Visuomptor behaviours during functional task performance with a myoelectric prosthesis , 2012 .

[21]  M Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  Trajectory planning and feedforward design for electromechanical motion systems , 2005 .

[22]  J. Verbunt,et al.  Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  William R Ledoux,et al.  Residual-limb skin temperature in transtibial sockets. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[24]  Hanneke Bouwsema,et al.  Determining skill level in myoelectric prosthesis use with multiple outcome measures. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[25]  John V. Carlis,et al.  Interactive visualization of serial periodic data , 1998, UIST '98.

[26]  Js Head The effect of socket movement and electrode contact on myoelectric prosthesis control during daily living activities , 2014 .

[27]  P. Kyberd,et al.  Survey of Upper-Extremity Prosthesis Users in Sweden and the United Kingdom , 2007 .

[28]  Linda Resnik,et al.  The DEKA Arm: Its features, functionality, and evolution during the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm , 2014, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[29]  Alexandre Cardoso,et al.  On the use of Virtual and Augmented Reality for upper limb prostheses training and simulation , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[30]  J. Patrick Reilly,et al.  Applied Bioelectricity: From Electrical Stimulation to Electropathology , 1998 .

[31]  R. N. Scott Myoelectric Control Of Prostheses: A Brief History , 1992 .

[32]  Yei Hwan Jung,et al.  Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis , 2014, Nature Communications.

[33]  Malcolm H. Granat,et al.  Visualization of Sedentary Behavior Using an Event-Based Approach , 2015 .

[34]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  Jing-Yi Guo,et al.  Performances of one-dimensional sonomyography and surface electromyography in tracking guided patterns of wrist extension. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[36]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[37]  David Howard,et al.  Movement variability in stroke patients and controls performing two upper limb functional tasks: a new assessment methodology , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[38]  D. F. Lovely,et al.  The Origins and Nature of the Myoelectric Signal , 2004 .

[39]  Russell S Kirby,et al.  National estimates and race/ethnic-specific variation of selected birth defects in the United States, 1999-2001. , 2006, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[40]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  Does EMG control lead to distinct motor adaptation? , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[41]  Alexander W Dromerick,et al.  Feedforward control strategies of subjects with transradial amputation in planar reaching. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[42]  Anders Skrondal,et al.  Musculoskeletal pain and overuse syndromes in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[43]  G. Wood,et al.  Examining the Spatiotemporal Disruption to Gaze When Using a Myoelectric Prosthetic Hand , 2018, Journal of motor behavior.

[44]  D. Hoaglin,et al.  Fine-Tuning Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling , 1987 .

[45]  Peter J. Kyberd,et al.  Characterisation of the Clothespin Relocation Test as a functional assessment tool , 2018, Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering.

[46]  Virginia Wright,et al.  Prosthetic Outcome Measures for Use With Upper Limb Amputees: A Systematic Review of the Peer-Reviewed Literature, 1970 to 2009 , 2009 .

[47]  Christina Rock Gambrell Overuse Syndrome and the Unilateral Upper Limb Amputee: Consequences and Prevention , 2008 .

[48]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[49]  C Marincek,et al.  Upper limb prosthetic use in Slovenia , 1994, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[50]  Ellen Poliakoff,et al.  The effect of gym training on multiple outcomes in Parkinson's disease: a pilot randomised waiting-list controlled trial. , 2013, NeuroRehabilitation.

[51]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[52]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Neural Interfaces for Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: The State of the Art and Future Possibilities , 2011, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[53]  G. Wood,et al.  The impact of using an upper-limb prosthesis on the perception of real and illusory weight differences , 2018, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[54]  Ravi Vaidyanathan,et al.  Upper-limb prosthetic control using wearable multichannel mechanomyography , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[55]  Shang-Ming Zhou,et al.  Classification of accelerometer wear and non-wear events in seconds for monitoring free-living physical activity , 2015, BMJ Open.

[56]  Michelle M. Lusardi,et al.  Orthotics and prosthetics in rehabilitation , 2013 .

[57]  J. Eng,et al.  Exploring the Role of Accelerometers in the Measurement of Real World Upper-Limb Use After Stroke , 2015, Brain Impairment.

[58]  C A Phillips,et al.  Sensory feedback control of upper- and lower-extremity motor prostheses. , 1988, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[59]  Malcolm MacLachlan,et al.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES). , 2000 .

[60]  Hanneke Bouwsema,et al.  Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[61]  G A Hunter,et al.  The below-elbow myo-electric prosthesis. A comparison of the Otto Bock myo-electric prosthesis with the hook and functional hand. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[62]  R A Sherman,et al.  Utilization of prostheses among US veterans with traumatic amputation: a pilot survey. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[63]  JAN CHRISTIAN BRØND,et al.  Generating ActiGraph Counts from Raw Acceleration Recorded by an Alternative Monitor , 2017, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[64]  Dick H. Plettenburg,et al.  Bernstein’s Levels of Construction of Movements Applied to Upper Limb Prosthetics , 2012 .

[65]  Richard F. Weir,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CONTROLLER DELAY ON BOX AND BLOCK TEST PERFORMANCE , 2005 .

[66]  Wendy Hill,et al.  Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada , 2011, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[67]  S. Ando,et al.  Practice Effects on Reaction Time for Peripheral and Central Visual Fields , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[68]  David Clark-Carter Quantitative Psychological Research: The Complete Student's Companion , 2018 .

[69]  Chris Roast,et al.  Exploring virtual reality and prosthetic training , 2015, 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[70]  G. Kejlaa,et al.  Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees , 1993, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[71]  Malcolm MacLachlan,et al.  Factor Structure of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) with Individuals with Acquired Upper Limb Amputations , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[72]  Sydney Y Schaefer,et al.  Grip type and task goal modify reach-to-grasp performance in post-stroke hemiparesis. , 2012, Motor control.

[73]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[74]  Objectives and technological approach to the development of the multifunctional MANUS upper limb prosthesis , 2005, Robotica.

[75]  Mohammad M D Sobuh,et al.  Visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[76]  Michelle McDonnell,et al.  Action research arm test. , 2008, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[77]  Alicia J. Davis,et al.  Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[78]  P. Chappell,et al.  A review of clinical upper limb assessments within the framework of the WHO ICF. , 2007, Musculoskeletal care.

[79]  Sibylle B. Thies,et al.  The reality of myoelectric prostheses : understanding what makes , 2018 .

[80]  Mohammad Sobuh,et al.  Skill assessment in upper limb myoelectric prosthesis users: Validation of a clinically feasible method for characterising upper limb temporal and amplitude variability during the performance of functional tasks. , 2017, Medical engineering & physics.

[81]  James F Sallis,et al.  Comparison of older and newer generations of ActiGraph accelerometers with the normal filter and the low frequency extension , 2013, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[82]  Stephen Darling,et al.  Intraindividual reaction time variability affects P300 amplitude rather than latency , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[83]  Pieter U Dijkstra,et al.  Birth prevalence for congenital limb defects in the northern Netherlands: a 30-year population-based study , 2013, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[84]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  Motor control and learning with lower-limb myoelectric control in amputees. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[85]  Alison Sanford,et al.  Perceptions of cosmesis and function in adults with upper limb prostheses: a systematic literature review , 2011, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[86]  R.F. Weir,et al.  The Optimal Controller Delay for Myoelectric Prostheses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[87]  P. Kyberd,et al.  A Survey of Upper-Limb Prosthesis Users in Oxfordshire , 1998 .

[88]  Vicky Chan,et al.  The variable relationship between arm and hand use: A rationale for using finger magnetometry to complement wrist accelerometry when measuring daily use of the upper extremity , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[89]  C. Heyes,et al.  Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[90]  Aidan D. Roche,et al.  Prosthetic Myoelectric Control Strategies: A Clinical Perspective , 2014, Current Surgery Reports.

[91]  Anders Lyngvi Fougner,et al.  Robust, Coordinated and Proportional Myoelectric Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses , 2013 .

[92]  R. N. Scott,et al.  Error rate in five-state myoelectric control systems , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[93]  S. Vijayakumar,et al.  The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[94]  M. Levin,et al.  The development of coordination for reach-to-grasp movements in children , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[95]  K. Raichle,et al.  Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[96]  Ilaria Carpinella,et al.  Quantitative assessment of upper limb motor function in Multiple Sclerosis using an instrumented Action Research Arm Test , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[97]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Proportional myoelectric control of a virtual object to investigate human efferent control , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[98]  Jeonghyun Kim,et al.  An Epidermal Stimulation and Sensing Platform for Sensorimotor Prosthetic Control, Management of Lower Back Exertion, and Electrical Muscle Activation , 2016, Advanced materials.

[99]  C. Lang,et al.  Quantifying Real-World Upper-Limb Activity in Nondisabled Adults and Adults With Chronic Stroke , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[100]  Scott H Frey,et al.  Compensatory Changes Accompanying Chronic Forced Use of the Nondominant Hand by Unilateral Amputees , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[101]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Deprivation-related and use-dependent plasticity go hand in hand , 2013, eLife.

[102]  C. K. van der Sluis,et al.  Musculoskeletal Complaints in Transverse Upper Limb Reduction Deficiency and Amputation in The Netherlands: Prevalence, Predictors, and Effect on Health. , 2016, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[103]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[104]  H. Rodgers,et al.  Accelerometer measurement of upper extremity movement after stroke: a systematic review of clinical studies , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[105]  S. Engelborghs,et al.  Actigraphic Measurement of Motor Deficits in Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2008, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[106]  Kevin Warwick,et al.  Case Studies to Demonstrate the Range of Applications of the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure , 2009 .

[107]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[108]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Targeted reinnervation for enhanced prosthetic arm function in a woman with a proximal amputation: a case study , 2007, The Lancet.

[109]  Allister F. McGuire,et al.  A skin-inspired organic digital mechanoreceptor , 2015, Science.

[110]  Hanneke Bouwsema,et al.  Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[111]  Sherman Ed A RUSSIAN BIOELECTRIC-CONTROLLED PROSTHESIS: REPORT OF A RESEARCH TEAM FROM THE REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF MONTREAL. , 1964 .

[112]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[113]  Debbie Rand,et al.  Disparity Between Functional Recovery and Daily Use of the Upper and Lower Extremities During Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[114]  Kristin Østlie,et al.  Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[115]  Christian Antfolk,et al.  Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics , 2013, Expert review of medical devices.

[116]  Jacqueline S. Hebert,et al.  Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[117]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[118]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[119]  Angelo Davalli,et al.  Biofeedback for upper limb myoelectric prostheses , 2002 .

[120]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[121]  David Howard,et al.  A comparative evaluation of sonomyography, electromyography, force, and wrist angle in a discrete tracking task. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[122]  Kimatha Oxford Grice,et al.  Adult norms for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity. , 2003, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[123]  Grrishma Balakrishnan,et al.  A Comparative Study on Visual Choice Reaction Time for Different Colors in Females , 2014, Neurology research international.

[124]  S. Millstein,et al.  Prosthetic Use in Adult Upper Limb Amputees: A Comparison of the Body Powered and Electrically Powered Prostheses , 1986, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[125]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[126]  David Howard,et al.  A novel method of using accelerometry for upper limb FES control. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[127]  Joan Lobo-Prat,et al.  Evaluation of EMG, force and joystick as control interfaces for active arm supports , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[128]  Todd A Kuiken,et al.  Comparison of electromyography and force as interfaces for prosthetic control. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[129]  Martin Twiste,et al.  Monitoring of Upper Limb Prosthesis Activity in Trans-Radial Amputees , 2009 .

[130]  Dario Farina,et al.  A novel immersive augmented reality system for prosthesis training and assessment , 2016, 2016 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI).

[131]  D. Howard,et al.  A dual-task approach to the evaluation of the myokinemetric signal as an alternative to EMG , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[132]  Stefania Fatone,et al.  Comparison of range-of-motion and variability in upper body movements between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.