Phase sensitivity in bat sonar revisited

An echolocating bat produces echoes consisting of the convolution of echolocation call and the impulse response (IR) of the ensonified object. A crucial question in animal sonar is whether bats are able to extract this IR from the echo. The bat inner ear generates a frequency representation of call and echo and IR extraction in the frequency domain requires accurate analysis of both magnitude and phase information. Previous studies investigating the phase sensitivity of bats using a jitter paradigm reported a temporal acuity down to 10 ns, suggesting perfect sonar phase representation. In a phantom-target playback experiment, we investigate the perceptual phase sensitivity of the bat Phyllostomus discolor using a novel approach: instead of manipulating IR phase by changing IR delay (jitter paradigm), we randomized IR phase and thus lengthened the IR over time, leaving the magnitude spectrum unchanged. Our results show that phase sensitivity, as reflected in the analysis of signal duration, appears to be much lower than phase sensitivity, as reflected in the analysis of signal onset. The current data indicate that different temporal aspects of sonar processing are encoded with very different temporal resolution and thus an overall claim of “phase sensitivity” as such cannot be maintained.

[1]  Lutz Wiegrebe,et al.  Classification of natural textures in echolocation. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  Accuracy of target ranging in echolocating bats: acoustic information processing , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  Kristian Beedholm,et al.  The transfer function of a target limits the jitter detection threshold with signals of echolocating FM-bats , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  Manfred Kössl,et al.  Cochlear sensitivity in the lesser spear-nosed bat, Phyllostomus discolor , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[5]  R D Patterson,et al.  Temporal dynamics of pitch strength in regular interval noises. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  K. Beedholm,et al.  Bat sonar: an alternative interpretation of the 10-ns jitter result , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  G. Pollak,et al.  Some comments on the proposed perception of phase and nanosecond time disparities by echolocating bats , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  M. Willig,et al.  Dietary Overlap in Frugivorous and Insectivorous Bats from Edaphic Cerrado Habitats of Brazil , 1993 .

[9]  M. Kössl,et al.  Ambiguities in sound-duration selectivity by neurons in the inferior colliculus of the bat Molossus molossus from Cuba. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  C F Moss,et al.  Acoustic image representation of a point target in the bat Eptesicus fuscus: evidence for sensitivity to echo phase in bat sonar. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. H. Casseday,et al.  The monaural nuclei of the lateral lemniscus in an echolocating bat: parallel pathways for analyzing temporal features of sound , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  The sound of a sinusoid: Spectral models , 1994 .

[13]  J A Simmons,et al.  Perception of echo phase information in bat sonar. , 1979, Science.

[14]  A. Feng,et al.  Temporal selectivity by single neurons in the torus semicircularis of Batrachyla antartandica (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae) , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  Echolocation signals reflect niche differentiation in five sympatric congeneric bat species , 2004, Nature.

[16]  A. Surlykke,et al.  Integration time for short broad band clicks in echolocating FM-bats (Eptesicus fuscus) , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  Lutz Wiegrebe,et al.  The effect of preceding sonar emission on temporal integration in the bat, Megaderma lyra , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[18]  J. H. Casseday,et al.  Neural tuning to sound duration in the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  J. A. Simmons,et al.  Echo delay versus spectral cues for temporal hyperacuity in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  J. A. Simmons,et al.  Evidence for perception of fine echo delay and phase by the FM bat, Eptesicus fuscus , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  Lutz Wiegrebe,et al.  Temporal integration in the echolocating bat, Megaderma lyra , 1996, Hearing Research.

[22]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  Range estimation by echolocation in the bat Eptesicus fuscus: trading of phase versus time cues. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  S. Stevenson,et al.  Discrimination of jittered sonar echoes by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus: The shape of target images in echolocation , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[24]  A S Feng,et al.  Temporal coding in the frog auditory midbrain: the influence of duration and rise-fall time on the processing of complex amplitude-modulated stimuli. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  E. T. Hooper,et al.  Three Central American Bat Communitis: Structure, Reproductive Cycles, and Movement Patterns , 1972 .