Net-zero emissions energy systems

Path to zero carbon emissions Models show that to avert dangerous levels of climate change, global carbon dioxide emissions must fall to zero later this century. Most of these emissions arise from energy use. Davis et al. review what it would take to achieve decarbonization of the energy system. Some parts of the energy system are particularly difficult to decarbonize, including aviation, long-distance transport, steel and cement production, and provision of a reliable electricity supply. Current technologies and pathways show promise, but integration of now-discrete energy sectors and industrial processes is vital to achieve minimal emissions. Science, this issue p. eaas9793 BACKGROUND Net emissions of CO2 by human activities—including not only energy services and industrial production but also land use and agriculture—must approach zero in order to stabilize global mean temperature. Energy services such as light-duty transportation, heating, cooling, and lighting may be relatively straightforward to decarbonize by electrifying and generating electricity from variable renewable energy sources (such as wind and solar) and dispatchable (“on-demand”) nonrenewable sources (including nuclear energy and fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage). However, other energy services essential to modern civilization entail emissions that are likely to be more difficult to fully eliminate. These difficult-to-decarbonize energy services include aviation, long-distance transport, and shipping; production of carbon-intensive structural materials such as steel and cement; and provision of a reliable electricity supply that meets varying demand. Moreover, demand for such services and products is projected to increase substantially over this century. The long-lived infrastructure built today, for better or worse, will shape the future. Here, we review the special challenges associated with an energy system that does not add any CO2 to the atmosphere (a net-zero emissions energy system). We discuss prominent technological opportunities and barriers for eliminating and/or managing emissions related to the difficult-to-decarbonize services; pitfalls in which near-term actions may make it more difficult or costly to achieve the net-zero emissions goal; and critical areas for research, development, demonstration, and deployment. It may take decades to research, develop, and deploy these new technologies. ADVANCES A successful transition to a future net-zero emissions energy system is likely to depend on vast amounts of inexpensive, emissions-free electricity; mechanisms to quickly and cheaply balance large and uncertain time-varying differences between demand and electricity generation; electrified substitutes for most fuel-using devices; alternative materials and manufacturing processes for structural materials; and carbon-neutral fuels for the parts of the economy that are not easily electrified. Recycling and removal of carbon from the atmosphere (carbon management) is also likely to be an important activity of any net-zero emissions energy system. The specific technologies that will be favored in future marketplaces are largely uncertain, but only a finite number of technology choices exist today for each functional role. To take appropriate actions in the near term, it is imperative to clearly identify desired end points. To achieve a robust, reliable, and affordable net-zero emissions energy system later this century, efforts to research, develop, demonstrate, and deploy those candidate technologies must start now. OUTLOOK Combinations of known technologies could eliminate emissions related to all essential energy services and processes, but substantial increases in costs are an immediate barrier to avoiding emissions in each category. In some cases, innovation and deployment can be expected to reduce costs and create new options. More rapid changes may depend on coordinating operations across energy and industry sectors, which could help boost utilization rates of capital-intensive assets, but this will require overcoming institutional and organizational challenges in order to create new markets and ensure cooperation among regulators and disparate, risk-averse businesses. Two parallel and broad streams of research and development could prove useful: research in technologies and approaches that can decarbonize provision of the most difficult-to-decarbonize energy services, and research in systems integration that would allow reliable and cost-effective provision of these services. A shower of molten metal in a steel foundry. Industrial processes such as steelmaking will be particularly challenging to decarbonize. Meeting future demand for such difficult-to-decarbonize energy services and industrial products without adding CO2 to the atmosphere may depend on technological cost reductions via research and innovation, as well as coordinated deployment and integration of operations across currently discrete energy industries. Some energy services and industrial processes—such as long-distance freight transport, air travel, highly reliable electricity, and steel and cement manufacturing—are particularly difficult to provide without adding carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere. Rapidly growing demand for these services, combined with long lead times for technology development and long lifetimes of energy infrastructure, make decarbonization of these services both essential and urgent. We examine barriers and opportunities associated with these difficult-to-decarbonize services and processes, including possible technological solutions and research and development priorities. A range of existing technologies could meet future demands for these services and processes without net addition of CO2 to the atmosphere, but their use may depend on a combination of cost reductions via research and innovation, as well as coordinated deployment and integration of operations across currently discrete energy industries.

[1]  坂倉 省吾,et al.  Technology Review : 抄録雑誌の概要 , 1987 .

[2]  M. A. Rosen,et al.  Thermodynamic investigation of hydrogen production by steam-methane reforming , 1991 .

[3]  Part II: Economic Analysis , 1994 .

[4]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Energy implications of future stabilization of atmospheric CO2 content , 1998, Nature.

[5]  V. Smil Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production , 2000 .

[6]  M. Itoh,et al.  Hydrogen generation by ammonia cracking with iron metal-rare earth oxide composite catalyst , 2002 .

[7]  Susan M. Schoenung,et al.  Long- vs. short-term energy storage technologies analysis : a life-cycle cost study : a study for the DOE energy storage systems program. , 2003 .

[8]  James Larminie,et al.  Fuel Cell Systems Explained: Larminie/Fuel Cell Systems Explained , 2003 .

[9]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Thermal Energy Storage , 2004 .

[10]  H. Hiebler,et al.  Plazma vodikovo redukcijsko pretaljivanje - opcija za izradu čelika u budućnosti , 2004 .

[11]  G. Faninger Thermal Energy Storage , 2005 .

[12]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[13]  P. Mahadevan,et al.  An overview , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[14]  Pushpam Kumar Agriculture (Chapter8) in IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[15]  Nathan E. Hultman,et al.  A reactor-level analysis of busbar costs for US nuclear plants, 1970-2005 , 2007 .

[16]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Stabilizing climate requires near‐zero emissions , 2008 .

[17]  W. Winiwarter,et al.  How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world , 2008 .

[18]  Dennis N. Assanis,et al.  The Fuel Mix Limits and Efficiency of a Stoichiometric, Ammonia, and Gasoline Dual Fueled Spark Ignition Engine , 2008 .

[19]  David W Keith,et al.  Carbon neutral hydrocarbons , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.  Transportation energy data book , 2008 .

[21]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[22]  R. Fehrmann,et al.  Catalytic Ammonia Decomposition Over Ruthenium Nanoparticles Supported on Nano-Titanates , 2009 .

[23]  Nathanael Greene,et al.  Comparative analysis of efficiency, environmental impact, and process economics for mature biomass refining scenarios , 2009 .

[24]  Abigaïl Fallot,et al.  Assessing land availability to produce biomass for energy: The case of Brazilian charcoal for steel making , 2009 .

[25]  J. E. Davison,et al.  CO2 Capture in the Cement Industry , 2009 .

[26]  Jianli Hu,et al.  An overview of hydrogen production technologies , 2009 .

[27]  Arnulf Grubler,et al.  The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: A case of negative learning by doing , 2010 .

[28]  Jacob Brouwer,et al.  On the role of fuel cells and hydrogen in a more sustainable and renewable energy future , 2010 .

[29]  K. Lindgren,et al.  The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) , 2010 .

[30]  H. Jeanmart,et al.  Ammonia combustion at elevated pressure and temperature conditions , 2010 .

[31]  Chakib Bouallou,et al.  Competitiveness of hydrogen production by High Temperature Electrolysis: Impact of the heat source and identification of key parameters to achieve low production costs , 2010 .

[32]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  The effect of communication architecture on the availability, reliability, and economics of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle-to-grid ancillary services , 2010 .

[33]  H. Matthews,et al.  Future CO2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure , 2010, Science.

[34]  S. Kent Hoekman,et al.  CO2 recycling by reaction with renewably-generated hydrogen , 2010 .

[35]  P. Fennell,et al.  Investigation into potential synergy between power generation, cement manufacture and CO2 abatement using the calcium looping cycle , 2011 .

[36]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Efficiency evaluation of a biomass gasification-based hydrogen production , 2011 .

[37]  Nathan Lewis,et al.  Direct Air Capture of CO2 with Chemicals: A Technology Assessment for the APS Panel on Public Affairs , 2011 .

[38]  K. Lackner,et al.  Sustainable hydrocarbon fuels by recycling CO2 and H2O with renewable or nuclear energy , 2011 .

[39]  Wang Wei,et al.  Methanation of carbon dioxide: an overview , 2011 .

[40]  Kuo-Hsin Lin,et al.  Biomass gasification for hydrogen production , 2011 .

[41]  Ali H. Abedin,et al.  A Critical Review of Thermochemical Energy Storage Systems , 2011 .

[42]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Comparative assessment of CO2 capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes , 2012 .

[43]  Sarah Brennan,et al.  The urgency of the development of CO2 capture from ambient air , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  H. Moayedi,et al.  Electrical Efficiency of Electrolytic Hydrogen Production , 2012, International Journal of Electrochemical Science.

[45]  M. Melaina,et al.  Production of Fischer–Tropsch liquid fuels from high temperature solid oxide co-electrolysis units , 2012 .

[46]  Jessika E. Trancik,et al.  Determinants of the Pace of Global Innovation in Energy Technologies , 2012, PloS one.

[47]  Lin Zhu,et al.  Analysis of Class 8 hybrid-electric truck technologies using diesel, LNG, electricity, and hydrogen, as the fuel for various applications , 2013, 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27).

[48]  Rahul Anantharaman,et al.  Application of advanced technologies for CO2 capture from industrial sources , 2013 .

[49]  Marc Melaina,et al.  Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues , 2013 .

[50]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  Development without energy? Assessing future scenarios of energy consumption in developing countries , 2013 .

[51]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Power to Gas , 2013 .

[52]  Sebastiaan Deetman,et al.  The role of negative CO2 emissions for reaching 2 °C—insights from integrated assessment modelling , 2013, Climatic Change.

[53]  Zhaohong He,et al.  Study on using hydrogen and ammonia as fuels: Combustion characteristics and NOx formation , 2014 .

[54]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Natural gas from shale formation – The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States , 2014 .

[55]  Thomas J Wood,et al.  Hydrogen production from ammonia using sodium amide. , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[56]  Antonella Ingenito,et al.  A review on hydrogen industrial aerospace applications , 2014 .

[57]  Levelized Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2020 , 2014 .

[58]  M. Götz State of the Art and Perspectives of CO2 Methanation Process Concepts for Power-to-Gas Applications (Vortrag) , 2014 .

[59]  Sally M. Benson,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: Issues and Prospects , 2014 .

[60]  William Davis,et al.  Optimal year-round operation for methane production from CO2 and water using wind and/or solar energy , 2014 .

[61]  John P. Weyant,et al.  The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies , 2014, Climatic Change.

[62]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  How negative can biofuels with CCS take us and at what cost? Refining the economic potential of biofuel production with CCS using spatially-explicit modeling☆ , 2014 .

[63]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Power to Gas: Technological Overview, Systems Analysis and Economic Assessment , 2015 .

[64]  Donald R Ort,et al.  The theoretical limit to plant productivity. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[65]  James R. McKone,et al.  Will Solar-Driven Water-Splitting Devices See the Light of Day? , 2014 .

[66]  Sandra Curtin,et al.  The Business Case for Fuel Cells 2014: Powering the Bottom Line for Businesses and Communities , 2014 .

[67]  Apurba Sakti,et al.  A techno-economic analysis and optimization of Li-ion batteries for light-duty passenger vehicle electrification , 2015 .

[68]  Nathanael J. Greene,et al.  The need for biofuels as part of a low carbon energy future , 2015 .

[69]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Zero emission targets as long-term global goals for climate protection , 2015 .

[70]  C. Flachsland Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2015 .

[71]  A. Lanzini,et al.  Synthetic natural gas via integrated high-temperature electrolysis and methanation: Part I—Energy performance , 2015 .

[72]  J. M. Don MacElroy Closing the carbon cycle through rational use of carbon-based fuels , 2015, Ambio.

[73]  Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.  Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 34 , 2015 .

[74]  Anne Hampson,et al.  Catalog of CHP Technologies , 2015 .

[75]  Jennifer Kurtz,et al.  Stationary Fuel Cell System Composite Data Products: Data through Quarter 4 of 2014; NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) , 2015 .

[76]  Kimberly M. Papadantonakis,et al.  A taxonomy for solar fuels generators , 2015 .

[77]  Manuel Chazarra,et al.  Trends and challenges in the operation of pumped-storage hydropower plants , 2015 .

[78]  Jessica Strefler,et al.  Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios , 2015 .

[79]  Damian Barrett,et al.  Carbon emissions due to deforestation for the production of charcoal used in Brazil’s steel industry , 2015 .

[80]  John H. Holbrook,et al.  Use of NH3 fuel to achieve deep greenhouse gas reductions from US transportation , 2015 .

[81]  Andrea Lanzini,et al.  Synthetic natural gas via integrated high-temperature electrolysis and methanation: Part II-Economic analysis , 2015 .

[82]  Sanna Syri,et al.  Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis , 2015 .

[83]  Dale T. Bradshaw,et al.  DOE/EPRI Electricity Storage Handbook in Collaboration with NRECA , 2016 .

[84]  F. Graf,et al.  Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review , 2016 .

[85]  Paul Fennell,et al.  Phase evolution, characterisation, and performance of cement prepared in an oxy-fuel atmosphere. , 2016, Faraday discussions.

[86]  Rebecca E. Ciez,et al.  The cost of lithium is unlikely to upend the price of Li-ion storage systems , 2016 .

[87]  Eleanor C. Stokes,et al.  Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications , 2016 .

[88]  J. Farmer,et al.  How Predictable is Technological Progress? , 2015, 1502.05274.

[89]  Claus Pade,et al.  Substantial global carbon uptake by cement carbonation , 2016 .

[90]  Fritz B. Prinz,et al.  Fuel Cell Fundamentals: O'Hayre/Fuel Cell Fundamentals , 2016 .

[91]  A. B. Gallo,et al.  Energy storage in the energy transition context: A technology review , 2016 .

[92]  Chris Bataille,et al.  Managing carbon-intensive materials in a decarbonizing world without a global price on carbon , 2016 .

[93]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  The role of capital costs in decarbonizing the electricity sector , 2016 .

[94]  Nathan S Lewis,et al.  Research opportunities to advance solar energy utilization , 2016, Science.

[95]  Michel Noussan,et al.  Operational analysis of natural gas combined cycle CHP plants: Energy performance and pollutant emissions , 2016 .

[96]  Yifei Wang,et al.  A review on unitized regenerative fuel cell technologies, part-A: Unitized regenerative proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2016 .

[97]  Yuanfu Xie,et al.  Future cost-competitive electricity systems and their impact on US CO2 emissions , 2016 .

[98]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions , 2016 .

[99]  Arthur Yip,et al.  Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors , 2016 .

[100]  Deger Saygin,et al.  Long-term model-based projections of energy use and CO2 emissions from the global steel and cement industries , 2016 .

[101]  Matthew R. Shaner,et al.  A comparative technoeconomic analysis of renewable hydrogen production using solar energy , 2016 .

[102]  J. Trancik,et al.  Value of storage technologies for wind and solar energy , 2016 .

[103]  Kirtan. N. Soni Hydrogen Plasma Smelting Reduction: An Option for Steelmaking In The Future , 2017 .

[104]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Detailed assessment of global transport-energy models’ structures and projections , 2017 .

[105]  Jay F. Whitacre,et al.  Comparison between cylindrical and prismatic lithium-ion cell costs using a process based cost model , 2017 .

[106]  Erik Delarue,et al.  Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review , 2017 .

[107]  Zhi Zhou,et al.  Profitability Evaluation of Load-Following Nuclear Units with Physics-Induced Operational Constraints , 2017 .

[108]  Zoe Kapetaki,et al.  Overview of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Demonstration Project Business Models: Risks and Enablers on the Two Sides of the Atlantic , 2017 .

[109]  Niall Mac Dowell,et al.  Optimisation and evaluation of flexible operation strategies for coal- and gas-CCS power stations with a multi-period design approach , 2017 .

[110]  Fikile R. Brushett,et al.  Air-Breathing Aqueous Sulfur Flow Battery for Ultralow-Cost Long-Duration Electrical Storage , 2017 .

[111]  L. Lynd The grand challenge of cellulosic biofuels , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[113]  A. Hawkes,et al.  Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study , 2017 .

[114]  J. Eom,et al.  The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .

[115]  L. Lynd,et al.  Cellulosic ethanol: status and innovation. , 2017, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[116]  Peter H. Pfromm,et al.  Towards sustainable agriculture: Fossil-free ammonia , 2017 .

[117]  D. Banister,et al.  The Imperatives of Sustainable Development , 2017 .

[118]  C. Müller,et al.  Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm , 2017 .

[119]  G. Janssens‑Maenhout,et al.  EDGAR v 4 . 3 . 2 Global Atlas of the three major greenhouse gas emissions for the period 1970 – 2012 , 2017 .

[120]  M. Strubegger,et al.  Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives , 2017 .

[121]  Loi Lei Lai,et al.  A comprehensive review on large-scale photovoltaic system with applications of electrical energy storage , 2017 .

[122]  Jeff Tollefson,et al.  The wooden skyscrapers that could help to cool the planet , 2017, Nature.

[123]  Nilay Shah,et al.  The role of CO 2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change , 2017 .

[124]  O. Cavalett,et al.  Environmental impacts of technology learning curve for cellulosic ethanol in Brazil , 2017 .

[125]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Energy storage deployment and innovation for the clean energy transition , 2017, Nature Energy.

[126]  Page Kyle,et al.  Role of the Freight Sector in Future Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[127]  Matthew R. Shaner,et al.  Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power in the United States , 2018 .

[128]  Zhi Zhou,et al.  The benefits of nuclear flexibility in power system operations with renewable energy , 2018, Applied Energy.

[129]  D. Hunter Issues and prospects , 2018, Desperately Seeking Solutions.

[130]  J. Brouwer,et al.  Critical Evaluation of Dynamic Reversible Chemical Energy Storage with High Temperature Electrolysis , 2018 .

[131]  D. Stolten,et al.  The investment costs of electrolysis - A comparison of cost studies from the past 30 years , 2018 .

[132]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  EDGAR v4.3.2 Global Atlas of the three major greenhouse gas emissions for the period 1970–2012 , 2017, Earth System Science Data.

[133]  Marta Alexandra Silva Guerreiro,et al.  World Business Council for Sustainable Development , 2020, Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management.