Catastrophic disruptions as the origin of bilobate comets

Several comets observed at close range have bilobate shapes1, including comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko (67P/C–G), which was imaged by the European Space Agency’s Rosetta mission2,3. Bilobate comets are thought to be primordial because they are rich in supervolatiles (for example, N2 and CO) and have a low bulk density, which implies that their formation requires a very low-speed accretion of two bodies. However, slow accretion does not only occur during the primordial phase of the Solar System; it can also occur at later epochs as part of the reaccumulation process resulting from the collisional disruption of a larger body4, so this cannot directly constrain the age of bilobate comets. Here, we show by numerical simulation that 67P/C–G and other elongated or bilobate comets can be formed in the wake of catastrophic collisional disruptions of larger bodies while maintaining their volatiles and low density throughout the process. Since this process can occur at any epoch of our Solar System’s history, from early on through to the present day5, there is no need for these objects to be formed primordially. These findings indicate that observed prominent geological features, such as pits and stratified surface layers4,5, may not be primordial.This paper puts into question the standard scenario of a primordial formation for bilobate comets. The authors show that bilobate comets can retain their properties even if they form through collisions of larger bodies, which can happen at any time.

[1]  Nicolas Thomas,et al.  Evidence for geologic processes on comets , 2016 .

[2]  S. Debei,et al.  Rosetta mission results pre-perihelion Special feature Comet 67 P / Churyumov-Gerasimenko : Constraints on its origin from OSIRIS observations , 2015 .

[3]  Hans Rickman,et al.  Comets as collisional fragments of a primordial planetesimal disk , 2015, 1504.04512.

[4]  Erik Asphaug,et al.  Impact Simulations with Fracture. I. Method and Tests , 1994 .

[5]  Yang Yu,et al.  Small-body deflection techniques using spacecraft: Techniques in simulating the fate of ejecta , 2016, 1601.05844.

[6]  W. Benz,et al.  How primordial is the structure of comet 67P? - Combined collisional and dynamical models suggest a late formation , 2016, 1611.02604.

[7]  W. Benz,et al.  Numerical simulations of impacts involving porous bodies: I. Implementing sub-resolution porosity in a 3D SPH hydrocode , 2008, 0807.1264.

[8]  Martin Jutzi,et al.  SPH calculations of asteroid disruptions: The role of pressure dependent failure models , 2015, 1502.01860.

[9]  S. Debei,et al.  Rosetta mission results pre-perihelion Special feature Regional surface morphology of comet 67 P / Churyumov-Gerasimenko from Rosetta / OSIRIS images ? , 2015 .

[10]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  Numerical simulations of asteroids modelled as gravitational aggregates with cohesion , 2009 .

[11]  P. Tanga,et al.  Collisions and Gravitational Reaccumulation: Forming Asteroid Families and Satellites , 2001, Science.

[12]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[13]  Daniel J. Scheeres,et al.  Fission and reconfiguration of bilobate comets as revealed by 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko , 2016, Nature.

[14]  J. Stadel.  Cosmological N-body simulations and their analysis , 2001 .

[15]  E. Asphaug,et al.  The shape and structure of cometary nuclei as a result of low-velocity accretion , 2015, Science.

[16]  R. H. Brown,et al.  Observations of Comet 19P/Borrelly by the Miniature Integrated Camera and Spectrometer Aboard Deep Space 1 , 2002, Science.

[17]  S. Debei,et al.  The primordial nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2015 .

[18]  S. Debei,et al.  Large heterogeneities in comet 67P as revealed by active pits from sinkhole collapse , 2015, Nature.

[19]  S. Debei,et al.  On the nucleus structure and activity of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2015, Science.

[20]  H. Melosh,et al.  EPOXI at Comet Hartley 2 , 2011, Science.

[21]  S. Debei,et al.  Gravitational slopes, geomorphology, and material strengths of the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from OSIRIS observations , 2015, 1509.02707.

[22]  P. Lamy,et al.  HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS OF THE NUCLEUS AND INNER COMA OF COMET19P/1904 Y2 (BORRELLY) , 1998 .

[23]  M. Zolensky,et al.  Search for primitive matter in the Solar System , 2017 .

[24]  S. Debei,et al.  Two independent and primitive envelopes of the bilobate nucleus of comet 67P , 2015, Nature.

[25]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  Astronomy Astrophysics Letter to the Editor Collision and gravitational reaccumulation: Possible formation mechanism of the asteroid Itokawa , 2013 .

[26]  Collisions and Gravitational Reaccumulation : Forming Asteroid Families and Satellites , .

[27]  D. Brownlee,et al.  Comet 81P/Wild 2 size, shape, and orientation , 2004 .

[28]  T. Lauer,et al.  Impact craters on Pluto and Charon indicate a deficit of small Kuiper belt objects , 2016, Science.

[29]  M. F. A'Hearn,et al.  Deep Impact: excavating comet 9P/Tempel 1 , 2005, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

[30]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[31]  H. Rickman.  The nucleus of comet Halley: Surface structure, mean density, gas and dust production , 1989 .

[32]  Creep stability of the proposed AIDA mission target 65803 Didymos: I. Discrete cohesionless granular physics model , 2017, 1703.01595.

[33]  W. Benz,et al.  Formation of bi-lobed shapes by sub-catastrophic collisions. A late origin of comet 67P's structure , 2016, 1611.02615.

[34]  Gareth S. Collins,et al.  Numerical simulations of impact crater formation with dilatancy , 2014 .

[35]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  An implementation of the soft-sphere discrete element method in a high-performance parallel gravity tree-code , 2012, Granular Matter.

[36]  George Lake,et al.  Direct Large-Scale N-Body Simulations of Planetesimal Dynamics , 2000 .