Analyses of U.S. and Japanese Management Processes Associated with New Product Success and Failure in High and Low Familiarity Markets

Abstract As detailed in the pages of JPIM and other publications, considerable research effort has been devoted to identifying the preconditions for new product success. Studies of Japanese and U.S. new product development (NPD) practices have shown that such factors as sales and marketing expertise, technical expertise, decentralized decision making, RD the other two products from each firm were targeted for low familiarity markets. The U.S. and Japanese models developed in this study Exhibit some marked differences from one another. In a familiar market, the U.S. model emphasizes sales and marketing expertise and competent project managers. Under conditions of low market familiarity, this basic model is supplemented with high degrees of R&D/marketing integration, senior management involvement, and decentralization. In this way, the U.S. models reflect a degree of flexibility in adapting the approach to match the prevailing market conditions. In contrast, the two Japanese models of new product success (under low and high familiarity) point to a more invariant system. In other words, the findings from this study reinforce the notion that successful management of NPD requires careful consideration of the firm’s environment. Practices that have proven successful in a particular culture and market environment may not be directly transferable to another setting.

[1]  M. Parry,et al.  A Cross-National Comparative Study of New Product Development Processes: Japan and the United States , 1997 .

[2]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure , 1979 .

[3]  William E. Souder,et al.  Achieving Organizational Consensus with Respect to R&D Project Selection Criteria : Management Science , 1975 .

[4]  David Wilemon,et al.  The Credibility–Cooperation Connection at the R&D‐Marketing Interface , 1988 .

[5]  William E. Souder,et al.  Context and Antecedents of Information Utility at the R&D/Marketing Interface , 1996 .

[6]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[7]  Alden S. Bean,et al.  Meet Your Competition: Results from the 1994 IRI/CIMS Annual R&D Survey , 1996 .

[8]  R. Cooper,et al.  Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors , 1996 .

[9]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  L. Dwyer,et al.  Organizational Environment, New Product Process Activities, and Project Outcomes , 1991 .

[11]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Successful Industrial Product Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review , 1990 .

[12]  William E. Souder,et al.  INTEGRATING MARKETING AND R&D PROJECT PERSONNEL WITHIN INNOVATION PROJECTS: AN INFORMATION UNCERTAINTY MODEL* , 1992 .

[13]  J. Hauser,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature , 1996 .

[14]  Wm. E. Souder,et al.  A causal model of the impact of skills, synergy, and design sensitivity on new product performance , 1997 .

[15]  B. Bowonder,et al.  Japanese technological innovation strategy: Recent trends , 1992 .

[16]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[17]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[18]  Wm. E. Souder,et al.  Factors influencing new product success and failure in small entrepreneurial high-technology electronics firms , 1994 .

[19]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[20]  M. Parry,et al.  R&D-marketing integration in Japanese high-technology firms: Hypotheses and empirical evidence , 1993 .

[21]  M. Parry,et al.  The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes , 1997 .

[22]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[23]  William E. Souder,et al.  Effectiveness of Nominal and Interacting Group Decision Processes for Integrating R&D and Marketing , 1977 .

[24]  T R Miller,et al.  The Japanese management theory jungle. , 1984, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.