Standing on a continuously moving platform: is body inertia counteracted or exploited?

Abstract We describe the characteristics of displacement of the head and hip in normal young subjects standing on a moving platform undergoing continuous sinusoidal horizontal translation in the antero-posterior direction, at frequencies ranging from 0.1–1 Hz. The head, hip and malleolus were marked by light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and the displacement of each LED was quantified by (1) the measure of the shift during each cycle of translation, (2) the standard deviation (SD) of the path travelled during the whole trial, (3) the power spectrum (PS) of the signal and (4) the cross-correlation (CC) between pairs of LED signals. At each frequency of translation, with eyes open (EO), the displacement of head was smaller than that of hip, and the displacement of hip was smaller than that of malleolus. With eyes closed (EC), this order was reversed. The peak value of the CC functions of the pairs malleolus/head, malleolus/hip and hip/head decreased by passing from low to high frequency of translation, under both visual conditions, and decreased more for the pair malleolus/head than malleolus/hip. The lags between body segment displacements ranged between 30 ms and 150 ms, on average, the former segment of each pair preceding the latter. The fast Fourier transformation of hip and head displacement showed a power spectrum peak at the frequency imposed by the platform translation. The peak was larger with EC than EO. With EC, another peak appeared at 0.2 Hz, possibly corresponding to the respiratory frequency. We conclude that, when vision was allowed, subjects behaved as a non-rigid, non-inverted pendulum, and stabilised head in space. When vision was denied, head oscillated more than the platform, especially at low translation frequencies. Therefore, the strategy of balance control shifted from a pendulum to an inverted-pendulum behaviour, passing from active head-and-trunk control to maximal body compliance to the perturbation.

[1]  S. Bouisset,et al.  Is body balance more perturbed by respiration in seating than in standing posture? , 1994, Neuroreport.

[2]  V. Dietz,et al.  Visually induced destabilization of human stance: neuronal control of leg muscles. , 1992, Neuroreport.

[3]  C. Assaiante,et al.  A statistical approach to sensorimotor strategies: conjugate cross-correlations. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  T. Tokita,et al.  Postural response induced by horizontal sway of a platform. , 1983, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[5]  F. Horak,et al.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  F. Horak,et al.  Influence of central set on human postural responses. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  M Schieppati,et al.  The limits of equilibrium in young and elderly normal subjects and in parkinsonians. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  M Schieppati,et al.  Responses of leg muscles in humans displaced while standing. Effects of types of perturbation and of postural set. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  A Berthoz,et al.  The predictive brain: anticipatory control of head direction for the steering of locomotion , 1996, Neuroreport.

[10]  M. Gresty Stability of the head in pitch (neck flexion‐extension): Studies in normal subjects and patients with axial rigidity , 1989, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[11]  Michael A. Gresty,et al.  Control of Human Head Posture , 1995 .

[12]  W. Vincent Statistics In Kinesiology , 1994 .