Teamwork and controversy in undergraduate management courses in Hong Kong: Can the method reinforce the message?

Teams are increasingly recognized as critical for strategy, innovation, and other key organizational activities. This study used the theory of cooperation and competition to identify conditions that promote student team effectiveness in Hong Kong university undergraduate strategic management courses. Results from 70 teams across 12 classes indicate that groups with cooperative goals engaged in the open-minded constructive controversy; teams with independent goals avoided open discussion. Teams with a high level of constructive controversy rated themselves as effective; these teams also were rated as giving high quality presentations as measured by instructors’ marks but this result was not statistically significant. These results suggest that structuring cooperative teams can help students perform well in the classroom and may help prepared them to work in the emerging team organization.

[1]  M. Nicholson The Resolution of Conflict , 1967 .

[2]  R. A. Cosier The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on prediction accuracy , 1978 .

[3]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[4]  R. Mason Challenging strategic planning assumptions , 1981 .

[5]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[6]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .

[7]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[8]  W. Wedley,et al.  Constructive Controversy, the Vroom-Yetton Model, and Managerial Decision-Making , 1986 .

[9]  D. M. Georgoff,et al.  Harvard Business Review: David M. Georgoff and Robert G. Murdick, manager's guide to forecasting, 64 (Jan-Feb.) (1986) 110-120 , 1988 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 1988 .

[11]  Jeffrey Barker,et al.  CONFLICT APPROACHES OF EFFECTIVE AND INEFFECTIVE PROJECT MANAGERS: A FIELD STUDY IN A MATRIX ORGANIZATION[1] , 1988 .

[12]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[13]  Paula L. Rechner,et al.  Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making , 1989 .

[14]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[15]  Bernhard Wilpert,et al.  Applied psychology : an international review , 1989 .

[16]  Charles R. Schwenk Conflict in organizational decision making: an exploratory study of its effects in for-profit and not-for-profit organizations , 1990 .

[17]  J. George,et al.  Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. , 1990 .

[18]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition. , 1991 .

[19]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[20]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Responses To Legal Liability: Employee Exposure To Hazardous Materials, Vertical Integration, And Small Firm Production , 1992 .

[21]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizational Architecture: Designs for Changing Organizations , 1992 .

[22]  P. Goodman Groups That Work (and Those That Don't)Groups That Work (and Those That Don't) by Hackman Richard. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991, 512 pp. , 1992 .

[23]  G. Hofstede Cultural constraints in management theories , 1993 .

[24]  Cooperation, competition, and constructive controversy: Knowledge to empower self-managing work teams. , 1994 .

[25]  Robert r. Taylor,et al.  Consequences of Gainsharing , 1994 .

[26]  Glenn M. Parker Cross Functional Teams: Working with Allies, Enemies, and Other Strangers , 1994 .

[27]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  Competing For the Future : breakthrough strategies for seizing control of your industry and creating the markets of tomorrow , 1994 .

[28]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Creating high performance organizations : practices and results of employee involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 companies , 1995 .

[29]  K. Jehn A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[30]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research , 1995 .

[31]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work , 1995 .

[32]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations , 1995 .

[33]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[34]  van de Evert Vliert,et al.  Using Conflict in Organizations , 1997 .

[35]  Kwok Leung,et al.  Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures. , 1997 .

[36]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology , 1997 .

[37]  K. Jehn A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[38]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[39]  J. Stoker,et al.  Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams , 1997 .

[40]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[41]  D. Leonard,et al.  The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation , 1998 .

[42]  D. Tjosvold Cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: Accomplishments and challenges. , 1998 .

[43]  R. Nibler,et al.  Decision Making by Chinese and U.S. Students , 1998 .

[44]  M. Stanne,et al.  Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: a meta-analysis. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  M. Morris,et al.  Views from Inside and Outside: Integrating Emic and Etic Insights about Culture and Justice Judgment , 1999 .

[46]  Bernard L. Simonin Transfer of Marketing Know-How in International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Investigation of the Role and Antecedents of Knowledge Ambiguity , 1999 .

[47]  V. Druskat,et al.  Learning versus Performance in Short-Term Project Teams , 2000 .

[48]  C. Carl Pegels,et al.  Management heterogeneity, competitive interaction groups, and firm performance , 2000 .

[49]  M. West Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .