Spectral Identification of Lighting Type and Character

We investigated the optimal spectral bands for the identification of lighting types and the estimation of four major indices used to measure the efficiency or character of lighting. To accomplish these objectives we collected high-resolution emission spectra (350 to 2,500 nm) for forty-three different lamps, encompassing nine of the major types of lamps used worldwide. The narrow band emission spectra were used to simulate radiances in eight spectral bands including the human eye photoreceptor bands (photopic, scotopic, and “meltopic”) plus five spectral bands in the visible and near-infrared modeled on bands flown on the Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM). The high-resolution continuous spectra are superior to the broad band combinations for the identification of lighting type and are the standard for calculation of Luminous Efficacy of Radiation (LER), Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) and Color Rendering Index (CRI). Given the high cost that would be associated with building and flying a hyperspectral sensor with detection limits low enough to observe nighttime lights we conclude that it would be more feasible to fly an instrument with a limited number of broad spectral bands in the visible to near infrared. The best set of broad spectral bands among those tested is blue, green, red and NIR bands modeled on the band set flown on the Landsat Thematic Mapper. This set provides low errors on the identification of lighting types and reasonable estimates of LER and CCT when compared to the other broad band set tested. None of the broad band sets tested could make reasonable estimates of Luminous Efficacy (LE) or CRI. The photopic band proved useful for the estimation of LER. However, the three photoreceptor bands performed poorly in the identification of lighting types when compared to the bands modeled on the Landsat Thematic Mapper. Our conclusion is that it is feasible to identify lighting type and make reasonable estimates of LER and CCT using four or more spectral bands with minimal spectral overlap spanning the 0.4 to 1.0 um region.

[1]  I. Kloog,et al.  Light at Night Co‐distributes with Incident Breast but not Lung Cancer in the Female Population of Israel , 2008, Chronobiology international.

[2]  B. Duval Commission internationale de l’éclairage (CIE) , 2001, Optique Photonique.

[3]  Wenzhi Sun,et al.  Seeing More Clearly: Recent Advances in Understanding Retinal Circuitry , 2003, Science.

[4]  W D Wright,et al.  Color Science, Concepts and Methods. Quantitative Data and Formulas , 1967 .

[5]  R. Nelson,et al.  The dark side of light at night: physiological, epidemiological, and ecological consequences , 2007, Journal of pineal research.

[6]  P. Bogard,et al.  Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting , 2006 .

[7]  W. P. Hayes,et al.  Melanopsin: An opsin in melanophores, brain, and eye. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  F. Billmeyer Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd ed., by Gunter Wyszecki and W. S. Stiles, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1982, 950 pp. Price: $75.00 , 1983 .

[9]  Mark S. Rea,et al.  Meeting Report: The Role of Environmental Lighting and Circadian Disruption in Cancer and Other Diseases , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  R. Lyon Analysis of rocks by spectral infrared emission (8 to 25 microns) , 1965 .

[11]  E. Mills The Specter of Fuel-Based Lighting , 2005, Science.

[12]  Michael J. Choate,et al.  Effects of Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper and Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper plus radiometric and geometric calibrations and corrections on landscape characterization , 2001 .

[13]  G. Brainard,et al.  Action Spectrum for Melatonin Regulation in Humans: Evidence for a Novel Circadian Photoreceptor , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  P. Sutton,et al.  Paving the planet: impervious surface as proxy measure of the human ecological footprint , 2009 .

[15]  Christopher D. Elvidge,et al.  Christopher D. ElvidgeJeffrey SafranBenjamin TuttlePaul Sutton • Pierantonio CinzanoDonald PettitJohn ArvesenChristopher Small Potential for global mapping of development via a nightsat , 2007 .

[16]  Dale A. Kiefer,et al.  Reflectance spectroscopy of marine phytoplankton. Part 2. A simple model of ocean color1 , 1979 .

[17]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  International Journal of Remote Sensing the Nightsat Mission Concept the Nightsat Mission Concept , 2022 .

[18]  N. M. Milton Use of reflectance spectra of native plant species for interpreting airborne multispectral scanner data in the East Tintic Mountains, Utah , 1983 .

[19]  Travis Longcore,et al.  Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting , 2006 .

[20]  Budhendra L. Bhaduri,et al.  Who's In The Dark: Satellite Based Estimates Of Electrification Rates , 2011 .

[21]  R. Nemani,et al.  Global Distribution and Density of Constructed Impervious Surfaces , 2007, Sensors.

[22]  Boulder,et al.  The first World Atlas of the artificial night sky brightness , 2001, astro-ph/0108052.

[23]  H. S. Wolff,et al.  iRun: Horizontal and Vertical Shape of a Region-Based Graph Compression , 2022, Sensors.

[24]  Christopher D. Elvidge,et al.  Potential for global mapping of development via a nightsat mission , 2007 .

[25]  T. Croft Nighttime Images of the Earth from Space , 1978 .

[26]  B. Markham,et al.  Spectral characterization of the LANDSAT Thematic Mapper sensors , 1985 .

[27]  Gunther Wyszecki,et al.  Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd Edition , 2000 .

[28]  S. Hankinson,et al.  Night Work and Risk of Breast Cancer , 2006, Epidemiology.

[29]  C. Elvidge Visible and near infrared reflectance characteristics of dry plant materials , 1990 .

[30]  Jong Kyu Kim,et al.  Solid-State Light Sources Getting Smart , 2005, Science.

[31]  Budhendra L. Bhaduri,et al.  A global poverty map derived from satellite data , 2009, Comput. Geosci..