Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR-Cas9 targeting accuracy

The RNA-guided CRISPR–Cas9 nuclease from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) has been widely repurposed for genome editing. High-fidelity (SpCas9-HF1) and enhanced specificity (eSpCas9(1.1)) variants exhibit substantially reduced off-target cleavage in human cells, but the mechanism of target discrimination and the potential to further improve fidelity are unknown. Here, using single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer experiments, we show that both SpCas9-HF1 and eSpCas9(1.1) are trapped in an inactive state when bound to mismatched targets. We find that a non-catalytic domain within Cas9, REC3, recognizes target complementarity and governs the HNH nuclease to regulate overall catalytic competence. Exploiting this observation, we design a new hyper-accurate Cas9 variant (HypaCas9) that demonstrates high genome-wide specificity without compromising on-target activity in human cells. These results offer a more comprehensive model to rationalize and modify the balance between target recognition and nuclease activation for precision genome editing.

[1]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Crystal Structure of Cas9 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA , 2014, Cell.

[2]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[3]  Josée Dostie,et al.  Protospacer Adjacent Motif (PAM)-Distal Sequences Engage CRISPR Cas9 DNA Target Cleavage , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9 conformational activation as elucidated from enhanced molecular simulations , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas9 , 2015, Nature.

[6]  Tautvydas Karvelis,et al.  Direct observation of R-loop formation by single RNA-guided Cas9 and Cascade effector complexes , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  E. Lander,et al.  Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering , 2014, Cell.

[8]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  FLASH Assembly of TALENs Enables High-Throughput Genome Editing , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  Striking Plasticity of CRISPR-Cas9 and Key Role of Non-target DNA, as Revealed by Molecular Simulations , 2016, ACS central science.

[10]  D. Herschlag,et al.  Lessons from Enzyme Kinetics Reveal Specificity Principles for RNA-Guided Nucleases in RNA Interference and CRISPR-Based Genome Editing. , 2017, Cell systems.

[11]  David A. Scott,et al.  Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity , 2015, Science.

[12]  Gang Bao,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  J. Joung,et al.  Defining and improving the genome-wide specificities of CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[14]  M. Jinek,et al.  Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease , 2014, Nature.

[15]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Structures of a CRISPR-Cas9 R-loop complex primed for DNA cleavage , 2016, Science.

[16]  Samuel H Sternberg,et al.  Rational design of a split-Cas9 enzyme complex , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  A Cas9–guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition , 2015, Science.

[18]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Open-source guideseq software for analysis of GUIDE-seq data , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  GUIDE-Seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Philippe Horvath,et al.  A decade of discovery: CRISPR functions and applications , 2017, Nature Microbiology.

[21]  J. Doudna,et al.  The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 , 2014, Science.

[22]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Structures of Cas9 Endonucleases Reveal RNA-Mediated Conformational Activation , 2014, Science.

[23]  Zigurts K. Majumdar,et al.  Measurements of internal distance changes of the 30S ribosome using FRET with multiple donor-acceptor pairs: quantitative spectroscopic methods. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  J. Joung,et al.  High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 variants with undetectable genome-wide off-targets , 2015, Nature.

[25]  G. Church,et al.  Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology , 2013, Nature Methods.

[26]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases , 2014, Bioinform..

[27]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  High frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  J. Doudna,et al.  A conformational checkpoint between DNA binding and cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 , 2017, Science Advances.