The influence of electrolyte composition on the in vitro charge-injection limits of activated iridium oxide (AIROF) stimulation electrodes

The effects of ionic conductivity and buffer concentration of electrolytes used for in vitro measurement of the charge-injection limits of activated iridium oxide (AIROF) neural stimulation electrodes have been investigated. Charge-injection limits of AIROF microelectrodes were measured in saline with a range of phosphate buffer concentrations from [PO(4)(3-)] = 0 to [PO(4)(3-)] = 103 mM and ionic conductivities from 2-28 mS cm(-1). The charge-injection limits were insensitive to the buffer concentration, but varied significantly with ionic conductivity. Using 0.4 ms cathodal current pulses at 50 Hz, the charge-injection limit increased from 0.5 mC cm(-2) to 2.1 mC cm(-2) as the conductivity was increased from 2 mS cm(-1) to 28 mS cm(-1). An explanation is proposed in which the observed dependence on ionic conductivity arises from non-uniform reduction and oxidation within the porous AIROF and from uncorrected iR-drops that result in an overestimation of the redox potential during pulsing. Conversely, slow-sweep-rate cyclic voltammograms (CVs) were sensitive to buffer concentration with the potentials of the primary Ir(3+)/Ir(4+) reduction and oxidation reactions shifting approximately 300 mV as the buffer concentration decreased from [PO(4)(3-)] = 103 mM to [PO(4)(3-)] = 0 mM. The CV response was insensitive to ionic conductivity. A comparison of in vitro AIROF charge-injection limits in commonly employed electrolyte models of extracellular fluid revealed a significant dependence on the electrolyte, with more than a factor of 4 difference under some pulsing conditions, emphasizing the need to select an electrolyte model that closely matches the conductivity and ionic composition of the in vivo environment.

[1]  G. Beni,et al.  Electrochromism of Anodic Iridium Oxide Films III . Anion Mechanism , 1980 .

[2]  Oxidation State Changes and Structure of Electrochromic Iridium Oxide Films , 1980 .

[3]  S. Glarum,et al.  The A‐C Response of Iridium Oxide Films , 1980 .

[4]  S. B. Brummer,et al.  Activated Ir: An Electrode Suitable for Reversible Charge Injection in Saline Solution , 1983 .

[5]  X. Beebe,et al.  Charge injection limits of activated iridium oxide electrodes with 0.2 ms pulses in bicarbonate buffered saline (neurological stimulation application) , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  P. Pickup,et al.  Chemical analysis of the ionic content of hydrous iridium oxide films , 1988 .

[7]  C. Barbero,et al.  PROBE BEAM DEFLECTION INVESTIGATION OF THE CHARGE STORAGE REACTION IN ANODIC IRIDIUM AND TUNGSTEN OXIDE FILMS , 1990 .

[8]  T.L. Rose,et al.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. VIII. Electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses (neuronal application) , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  S. Gottesfeld,et al.  Quartz crystal microbalance measurements during oxidation/reduction of hydrous Ir oxide electrodes , 1991 .

[10]  B. Lengeler,et al.  Valency and Structure of Iridium in Anodic Iridium Oxide Films , 1993 .

[11]  Y. C. Wu,et al.  A dc method for the absolute determination of conductivities of the primary standard KCl solutions from 0-degrees-C to 50-degrees-C , 1994 .

[12]  C. Kufta,et al.  Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Warren M. Grill,et al.  Bladder and urethral pressures evoked by microstimulation of the sacral spinal cord in cats , 1999, Brain Research.

[14]  D. J. Warren,et al.  A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis , 1999, Vision Research.

[15]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Understanding the origin of visual percepts elicited by electrical stimulation of the human retina , 1999, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[16]  C. Bock,et al.  Anion and water involvement in hydrous Ir oxide redox reactions in acidic solutions , 1999 .

[17]  J. Weiland,et al.  Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  D. McCreery,et al.  Chronic microstimulation in the feline ventral cochlear nucleus: physiologic and histologic effects , 2000, Hearing Research.

[19]  S.F. Cogan,et al.  Electrodeposited iridium oxide for neural stimulation and recording electrodes , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  Robert V Shannon,et al.  Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: update on performance in 61 patients. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Sending Sound to the Brain , 2002, Science.

[22]  E. Toh,et al.  Cochlear and brainstem implantation. , 2002, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[23]  J. Weiland,et al.  Retinal prosthesis for the blind. , 2002, Survey of ophthalmology.

[24]  Warren M Grill,et al.  Electrical stimulation for the treatment of bladder dysfunction: Current status and future possibilities , 2002, Neurological research.

[25]  S. Kelly,et al.  Methods and perceptual thresholds for short-term electrical stimulation of human retina with microelectrode arrays. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  S. Kelly,et al.  Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  David Bradley,et al.  A model for intracortical visual prosthesis research. , 2003, Artificial organs.

[28]  Robert Cowan,et al.  An in vitro model for investigating impedance changes with cell growth and electrical stimulation: implications for cochlear implants , 2004, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  Stuart F Cogan,et al.  Over-pulsing degrades activated iridium oxide films used for intracortical neural stimulation , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  Daniel R. Merrill,et al.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  Philip R. Troyk,et al.  In vitro comparison of the charge-injection limits of activated iridium oxide (AIROF) and platinum-iridium microelectrodes , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  J. Weiland,et al.  Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[33]  J. Weiland,et al.  Retinal prostheses for the blind. , 2006, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[34]  Philip R. Troyk,et al.  Potential-biased, asymmetric waveforms for charge-injection with activated iridium oxide (AIROF) neural stimulation electrodes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.