Hurdles and opportunities in implementing marine biosecurity systems in data-poor regions

Abstract Managing marine nonindigenous species (mNIS) is challenging, because marine environments are highly connected, allowing the dispersal of species across large spatial scales, including geopolitical borders. Cross-border inconsistencies in biosecurity management can promote the spread of mNIS across geopolitical borders, and incursions often go unnoticed or unreported. Collaborative surveillance programs can enhance the early detection of mNIS, when response may still be possible, and can foster capacity building around a common threat. Regional or international databases curated for mNIS can inform local monitoring programs and can foster real-time information exchange on mNIS of concern. When combined, local species reference libraries, publicly available mNIS databases, and predictive modeling can facilitate the development of biosecurity programs in regions lacking baseline data. Biosecurity programs should be practical, feasible, cost-effective, mainly focused on prevention and early detection, and be built on the collaboration and coordination of government, nongovernment organizations, stakeholders, and local citizens for a rapid response.

[1]  N. G. Taylor,et al.  Unevenly distributed biological invasion costs among origin and recipient regions , 2023, Nature Sustainability.

[2]  H. Seebens,et al.  DASCO: A workflow to downscale alien species checklists using occurrence records and to re-allocate species distributions across realms , 2022, NeoBiota.

[3]  Mimi Tzeng Environmental Distances Between Marine Ecosystems of the World (MEOW) Ecoregions and Ecoprovinces , 2022, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[4]  G. Ruiz,et al.  Recreational boats routinely transfer organisms and promote marine bioinvasions , 2022, Biological Invasions.

[5]  P. Karachle,et al.  Citizen scientists contributing to alien species detection: the case of fishes and mollusks in European marine waters , 2022, Ecosphere.

[6]  H. Matthews-Cascon,et al.  Alien hotspot: Benthic marine species introduced in the Brazilian semiarid coast. , 2021, Marine pollution bulletin.

[7]  Martin A. Nuñez,et al.  Two decades of data reveal that Biological Invasions needs to increase participation beyond North America, Europe, and Australasia , 2021, Biological Invasions.

[8]  O. Floerl,et al.  Managing Biofouling on Submerged Static Artificial Structures in the Marine Environment – Assessment of Current and Emerging Approaches , 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[9]  O. Floerl,et al.  A Framework for Compiling Quantifications of Marine Biosecurity Risk Factors Associated With Common Vessel Types , 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[10]  Sofie Meeus,et al.  BioBlitz is More than a Bit of Fun , 2021, Biodiversity Information Science and Standards.

[11]  G. Inglis,et al.  Towards reproducible metabarcoding data: Lessons from an international cross‐laboratory experiment , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.

[12]  L. Lapierre,et al.  Underwater robots provide similar fish biodiversity assessments as divers on coral reefs , 2021, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation.

[13]  I. Côté,et al.  Research biases create overrepresented “poster children” of marine invasion ecology , 2021, Conservation Letters.

[14]  O. Floerl,et al.  Continuous bubble streams for controlling marine biofouling on static artificial structures , 2021, PeerJ.

[15]  X. Pochon,et al.  Towards the Optimization of eDNA/eRNA Sampling Technologies for Marine Biosecurity Surveillance , 2021, Water.

[16]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Alternative futures for global biological invasions , 2021, bioRxiv.

[17]  X. Pochon,et al.  Biosecurity implications of drifting marine plastic debris: Current knowledge and future research. , 2020, Marine pollution bulletin.

[18]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  An urban Blitz with a twist: rapid biodiversity assessment using aquatic environmental DNA , 2020, Environmental DNA.

[19]  H. Mienis,et al.  Non-indigenous species along the Israeli Mediterranean coast: tally, policy, outlook , 2020, Hydrobiologia.

[20]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050 , 2020, Global change biology.

[21]  Thomas Lake,et al.  Predicting range expansion of invasive species: Pitfalls and best practices for obtaining biologically realistic projections , 2020, Diversity and Distributions.

[22]  L. Nuninger,et al.  InvaCost, a public database of the economic costs of biological invasions worldwide , 2020, Scientific Data.

[23]  L. Airoldi,et al.  Emerging Solutions to Return Nature to the Urban Ocean. , 2020, Annual review of marine science.

[24]  Devin A. Lyons,et al.  Identifying marine invasion hotspots using stacked species distribution models , 2020, Biological Invasions.

[25]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Drivers of future alien species impacts: An expert‐based assessment , 2020, Global change biology.

[26]  Nathan R. Geraldi,et al.  Translational Molecular Ecology in practice: Linking DNA-based methods to actionable marine environmental management. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  E. Garcia-Vazquez,et al.  Environmental DNA from plastic and textile marine litter detects exotic and nuisance species nearby ports , 2020, PloS one.

[28]  E. Kolaczyk,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Network Data with R , 2020, Use R!.

[29]  J. Ferrario,et al.  Free rides to diving sites: the risk of marine non-indigenous species dispersal , 2020 .

[30]  T. Therriault,et al.  Unwanted networks: Vessel traffic heightens the risk of invasions in marine protected areas , 2020, Biological Conservation.

[31]  A. Suarez,et al.  From eDNA to citizen science: emerging tools for the early detection of invasive species , 2020 .

[32]  J. Borg,et al.  Unpublished Mediterranean records of marine alien and cryptogenic species , 2020 .

[33]  Jari Oksanen,et al.  Joint species distribution modelling with the r‐package Hmsc , 2020, Methods in ecology and evolution.

[34]  John R. U. Wilson,et al.  Stronger regional biosecurity is essential to prevent hundreds of harmful biological invasions , 2020, Global change biology.

[35]  F. Chavez,et al.  Environmental DNA reveals seasonal shifts and potential interactions in a marine community , 2020, Nature Communications.

[36]  H. Seebens,et al.  Alien species spreading via biofouling on recreational vessels in the Mediterranean Sea , 2019, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[37]  C. Abbott,et al.  A new approach to molecular biosurveillance of invasive species using DNA metabarcoding , 2019, Global change biology.

[38]  A. Deidun,et al.  Management priorities for marine invasive species. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[39]  G. Bernardi,et al.  Citizen-science for monitoring marine invasions and stimulating public engagement: a case project from the eastern Mediterranean , 2019, Biological Invasions.

[40]  Julian Evans,et al.  Non-indigenous species refined national baseline inventories: A synthesis in the context of the European Union's Marine Strategy Framework Directive , 2019, Marine pollution bulletin.

[41]  M. Sievers,et al.  Biofouling in marine aquaculture: a review of recent research and developments , 2019, Biofouling.

[42]  V. Sbragaglia,et al.  Climate change, biological invasions, and the shifting distribution of Mediterranean fishes: A large‐scale survey based on local ecological knowledge , 2019, Global change biology.

[43]  Á. Borja,et al.  Impediments to achieving integrated marine management across borders: The case of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive , 2019, Marine Policy.

[44]  T. Dempster,et al.  Identifying 'firebreaks' to fragment dispersal networks of a marine parasite. , 2019, International journal for parasitology.

[45]  K. Sink,et al.  Sampling methods and approaches to inform standardized detection of marine alien fouling species on recreational vessels. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[46]  Sergej Olenin,et al.  Advantages and Limitations of Environmental DNA/RNA Tools for Marine Biosecurity: Management and Surveillance of Non-indigenous Species , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[47]  Patrick Mäder,et al.  Machine learning for image based species identification , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[48]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Next‐generation conservation genetics and biodiversity monitoring , 2018, Evolutionary applications.

[49]  D. Abdo,et al.  Sounding out pests: the potential of hydroacoustics as a surveillance and compliance tool in aquatic biosecurity , 2018, Biological Invasions.

[50]  Ofrat Raveh,et al.  Alien turf: Overfishing, overgrazing and invader domination in south‐eastern Levant reef ecosystems , 2018 .

[51]  F. Courchamp,et al.  Can species distribution models really predict the expansion of invasive species? , 2018, PloS one.

[52]  Yan Zhu,et al.  From hierarchy to networking: the evolution of the “twenty-first-century Maritime Silk Road” container shipping system , 2018 .

[53]  E. Garcia-Vazquez,et al.  Anthropogenic marine litter composition in coastal areas may be a predictor of potentially invasive rafting fauna , 2018, PloS one.

[54]  Ross Martin,et al.  Aquaculture and urban marine structures facilitate native and non-indigenous species transfer through generation and accumulation of marine debris. , 2017, Marine pollution bulletin.

[55]  J. Chapman,et al.  Tsunami-driven rafting: Transoceanic species dispersal and implications for marine biogeography , 2017, Science.

[56]  Michael Bunce,et al.  Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA: metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[57]  K. Dafforn Eco-engineering and management strategies for marine infrastructure to reduce establishment and dispersal of non-indigenous species , 2017 .

[58]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Invasion Science: A Horizon Scan of Emerging Challenges and Opportunities. , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[59]  Anna Norberg,et al.  How to make more out of community data? A conceptual framework and its implementation as models and software. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[60]  Matej David,et al.  Developing and testing an Early Warning System for Non Indigenous Species and Ballast Water Management , 2017 .

[61]  Mario N. Tamburri,et al.  Quantifying the extent of niche areas in the global fleet of commercial ships: the potential for “super-hot spots” of biofouling , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[62]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Next-Generation Individual-Based Models Integrate Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Yes We Can, and Yes We Must , 2017, Ecosystems.

[63]  P. Usseglio,et al.  Effectiveness of removals of the invasive lionfish: how many dives are needed to deplete a reef? , 2017, PeerJ.

[64]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide , 2017, Nature Communications.

[65]  Lucy G. Anderson,et al.  Working up an appetite for lionfish: A market-based approach to manage the invasion of Pterois volitans in Belize , 2016 .

[66]  E. Garcia-Vazquez,et al.  Controlling populations of invasive pygmy mussel (Xenostrobus securis) through citizen science and environmental DNA. , 2016, Marine pollution bulletin.

[67]  D. Dudgeon,et al.  Alien species in aquatic environments: a selective comparison of coastal and inland waters in tropical and temperate latitudes , 2016 .

[68]  R. Wenne,et al.  Invasive blue mussels threaten regional scale genetic diversity in mainland and remote offshore locations: the need for baseline data and enhanced protection in the Southern Ocean , 2016, Global change biology.

[69]  O. Floerl,et al.  Potential environmental risks associated with biofouling management in salmon aquaculture , 2016 .

[70]  Lara Maistrello,et al.  Citizen science and early detection of invasive species: phenology of first occurrences of Halyomorpha halys in Southern Europe , 2016, Biological Invasions.

[71]  L. Maistrello,et al.  Citizen science and early detection of invasive species: phenology of first occurrences of Halyomorpha halys in Southern Europe , 2016, Biological Invasions.

[72]  Helen E. Roy,et al.  INVASIVESNET towards an International Association for Open Knowledge on Invasive Alien Species ; INVASIVESNET naar een Internationale Associatie voor Open Kennis over Invasieve Exoten , 2016 .

[73]  O. Floerl,et al.  Incorporating human behaviour into the risk–release relationship for invasion vectors: why targeting only the worst offenders can fail to reduce spread , 2016 .

[74]  A. Marchini,et al.  Assessing biological invasions in European Seas: Biological traits of the most widespread non-indigenous species , 2016 .

[75]  Ian G. Cowx,et al.  European Non-native Species in Aquaculture Risk Analysis Scheme – a summary of assessment protocols and decision support tools for use of alien species in aquaculture , 2016 .

[76]  P. Bellingham,et al.  Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion , 2016, Biological Invasions.

[77]  A. Marchini,et al.  Recommendations on standardizing lists of marine alien species: Lessons from the Mediterranean Sea. , 2015, Marine pollution bulletin.

[78]  Julian Evans,et al.  New Mediterranean Biodiversity Records (October 2015) , 2015 .

[79]  Matej David,et al.  Dose of truth—Monitoring marine non-indigenous species to serve legislative requirements , 2015 .

[80]  Marnie L Campbell,et al.  Classification of Non-Indigenous Species Based on Their Impacts: Considerations for Application in Marine Management , 2015, PLoS biology.

[81]  Laura Airoldi,et al.  Marine urbanization: an ecological framework for designing multifunctional artificial structures , 2015 .

[82]  M. Kulbicki,et al.  Niche shift can impair the ability to predict invasion risk in the marine realm: an illustration using Mediterranean fish invaders. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[83]  D. Minchin,et al.  "The day after tomorrow": anatomy of an 'r' strategist aquatic invasion. , 2014 .

[84]  S. Katsanevakis,et al.  Impacts of invasive alien marine species on ecosystem services and biodiversity: a pan-European review. , 2014 .

[85]  Barrie M. Forrest,et al.  Potential biocontrol agents for biofouling on artificial structures , 2014, Biofouling.

[86]  N. Dulvy,et al.  Linking removal targets to the ecological effects of invaders: a predictive model and field test. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[87]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  Improving management of aquatic invasions by integrating shipping network, ecological, and environmental data: data mining for social good , 2014, KDD.

[88]  Matej David,et al.  Making non-indigenous species information systems practical for management and useful for research: An aquatic perspective , 2014 .

[89]  C. Hewitt,et al.  How often are invasion-induced ecological impacts missed? , 2014, Biological Invasions.

[90]  Mark John Costello,et al.  Marine biofouling on recreational boats on swing moorings and berths , 2013 .

[91]  Susan L. Williams,et al.  Managing Multiple Vectors for Marine Invasions in an Increasingly Connected World , 2013 .

[92]  Barrie M. Forrest,et al.  Augmentative Biocontrol in Natural Marine Habitats: Persistence, Spread and Non-Target Effects of the Sea Urchin Evechinus chloroticus , 2013, PloS one.

[93]  B. Helmuth,et al.  Predicting biological invasions in marine habitats through eco‐physiological mechanistic models: a case study with the bivalve Brachidontes pharaonis , 2013 .

[94]  S. Meo,et al.  Impact of GDP, Spending on R&D, Number of Universities and Scientific Journals on Research Publications among Asian Countries , 2013, PloS one.

[95]  Michael T. Gastner,et al.  The risk of marine bioinvasion caused by global shipping. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[96]  S. Katsanevakis,et al.  Invading European Seas: Assessing pathways of introduction of marine aliens , 2013 .

[97]  A. Sfriso,et al.  Alien species in the Mediterranean Sea by 2012. A contribution to the application of European Union’s Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). Part 2. Introduction trends and pathways , 2012 .

[98]  Shimrit Perkol-Finkel,et al.  Conservation challenges in urban seascapes: promoting the growth of threatened species on coastal infrastructures , 2012 .

[99]  K. Reise,et al.  Nonnative macrobenthos in the Wadden Sea ecosystem , 2012 .

[100]  L. Herborg,et al.  Intracoastal shipping drives patterns of regional population expansion by an invasive marine invertebrate , 2012, Ecology and evolution.

[101]  J. McDonald,et al.  Marine biosecurity: the importance of awareness, support and cooperation in managing a successful incursion response. , 2012, Marine pollution bulletin.

[102]  M. Nordquist,et al.  Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries , 2012, The Legal Order of the Oceans.

[103]  M. Elliott,et al.  Recommendations on methods for the detection and control of biological pollution in marine coastal waters. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[104]  T. Therriault,et al.  Recreational boating: a large unregulated vector transporting marine invasive species , 2011 .

[105]  B. Oidtmann,et al.  International and national biosecurity strategies in aquatic animal health , 2011 .

[106]  G. Inglis,et al.  Arrival of the alien fanworm Sabella spallanzanii (Gmelin, 1791) (Polychaeta: Sabellidae) in two New Zealand harbours , 2011 .

[107]  Michael T. Gastner,et al.  The complex network of global cargo ship movements , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[108]  R. Meentemeyer,et al.  Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions? , 2009 .

[109]  O. Floerl,et al.  The importance of transport hubs in stepping‐stone invasions , 2009 .

[110]  Jennifer L. Molnar,et al.  Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity , 2008 .

[111]  Anil Markandya,et al.  Economic value of damage caused by marine bio-invasions: lessons from two European case studies. , 2008 .

[112]  Chad L. Hewitt,et al.  Nonindigenous biota on artificial structures: could habitat creation facilitate biological invasions? , 2007 .

[113]  A. Ricciardi Are Modern Biological Invasions an Unprecedented Form of Global Change? , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[114]  Barrie M. Forrest,et al.  Development and application of tools for incursion response: lessons learned from the management of the fouling pest Didemnum vexillum. , 2007 .

[115]  L. Anderson California’s Reaction to Caulerpa taxifolia: A Model for Invasive Species Rapid Response* , 2005, Biological Invasions.

[116]  Oliver Floerl,et al.  Starting the invasion pathway: the interaction between source populations and human transport vectors , 2005, Biological Invasions.

[117]  Oliver Floerl,et al.  A Risk-Based Predictive Tool to Prevent Accidental Introductions of Nonindigenous Marine Species , 2005, Environmental management.

[118]  J. Castilla,et al.  Down under the southeastern Pacific: marine non-indigenous species in Chile , 2005, Biological Invasions.

[119]  D. M. Wotton,et al.  Eradication success down under: heat treatment of a sunken trawler to kill the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida. , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[120]  Jonathan P. Man,et al.  Why do Some Countries Publish More Than Others? An International Comparison of Research Funding, English Proficiency and Publication Output in Highly Ranked General Medical Journals , 2003, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[121]  D. Barnes,et al.  Biodiversity: Invasions by marine life on plastic debris , 2002, Nature.

[122]  B. Baker National Management Plan Maps Strategy for Controlling Invasive Species , 2001 .

[123]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[124]  J. Geller,et al.  Ecological Roulette: The Global Transport of Nonindigenous Marine Organisms , 1993, Science.

[125]  J Reason,et al.  The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[126]  J. Carlton Man's role in changing the face of the ocean: biological invasions and implications for conservation of near-shore environments , 1989 .

[127]  S. Katsanevakis,et al.  Bioinvasion impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health in the Mediterranean Sea , 2022, Aquatic Invasions.

[128]  S. Katsanevakis,et al.  Eight years of BioInvasions Records: patterns and trends in alien and cryptogenic species records , 2021, Management of Biological Invasions.

[129]  Matthew R. First,et al.  Rapid quantification of biofouling with an inexpensive, underwater camera and image analysis , 2021, Management of Biological Invasions.

[130]  Vadim E. Panov,et al.  Introducing the World Register of Introduced Marine Species (WRiMS) , 2021, Management of Biological Invasions.

[131]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  OCEAN SPRAWL: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT IN A CHANGING WORLD , 2016 .

[132]  K. Fahd,et al.  Occurrence of the lessepsian species Portunus segnis (Crustacea: Decapoda) in the Gulf of Gabes (Tunisia): first record and new information on its biology and ecology , 2015 .

[133]  Cardoso Ana,et al.  European Alien Species Information Network (EASIN): supporting European policies and scientific research , 2015 .

[134]  Dan Minchin,et al.  Aquaculture and transport in a changing environment: overlap and links in the spread of alien biota. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[135]  V. E. Panov,et al.  Establishment of the Ponto-Caspian predatory cladoceran Evadne anonyx in the eastern Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea , 2006 .

[136]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Now you See them, Now you don't! – Population Crashes of Established Introduced Species , 2004, Biological Invasions.