Molecular Testing in Pediatric Oncology Practice

The goal for the molecular diagnostics workup of pediatric cancer patients is to help uncover as much useful genetic information as possible that can be applied to help guide the care of the patient and his or her family. At a preliminary level, this means making sure the most accurate and refined diagnosis is made, as this is the foundation upon which all subsequent treatment decisions are made. However, assistance in diagnosis is just the tip of the iceberg, and molecular diagnostics are rapidly becoming an essential part of the ongoing management of cancer patients, helping to predict disease progression, providing information regarding actionable targets to support therapeutic choices, and creating new possibilities for monitoring disease status and detecting recurrence at the earliest possible time. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and other newer genomics technologies, the complexity of genetic tests and the number of potential testing options continues to increase, placing a premium on proper informed decision-making and integration of results. There are many factors to consider when planning for molecular testing, including the differential diagnosis, the pretest likelihood of the presence of molecular alterations, the performance characteristics and comprehensiveness of potential test options, and the suitability of available specimens. This chapter aims to cover the different facets of formulating and employing a genetic testing strategy for pediatric oncology, including a review of testing indications, descriptions of common specimen types and their relative strengths and weaknesses, factors influencing test selection, and general recommendations for interpretation and integration of results into clinical care. Lastly, ethical considerations for genetic testing in the pediatric oncology population are addressed with the aim of minimizing informational harm and other potentially negative repercussions.

[1]  R. Salunga,et al.  Analysis of the effect of various decalcification agents on the quantity and quality of nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) recovered from bone biopsies. , 2013, Annals of diagnostic pathology.

[2]  Christopher B. Miller,et al.  Deletion of IKZF1 and prognosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  M. Erlander,et al.  Mutation-Enrichment Next-Generation Sequencing for Quantitative Detection of KRAS Mutations in Urine Cell-Free DNA from Patients with Advanced Cancers , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  Bert Vogelstein,et al.  DETECTION OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA IN EARLY AND LATE STAGE HUMAN MALIGNANCIES , 2014 .

[5]  M. Deininger,et al.  Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutations, drug resistance, and the road to a cure for chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2007, Blood.

[6]  B. Knoppers,et al.  Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[7]  N. Heerema,et al.  Improved early event-free survival with imatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a children's oncology group study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  A. Kiss,et al.  Variants of unknown significance in BRCA testing: impact on risk perception, worry, prevention and counseling. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  M. Kool,et al.  Risk stratification of childhood medulloblastoma in the molecular era: the current consensus , 2016, Acta Neuropathologica.

[10]  Klaus Pantel,et al.  Liquid Biopsies, What We Do Not Know (Yet). , 2017, Cancer cell.

[11]  Megan Allyse,et al.  Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[12]  Donald G Basel,et al.  Ending a Diagnostic Odyssey: Family Education, Counseling, and Response to Eventual Diagnosis. , 2017, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[13]  N. Blow Tissue preparation: Tissue issues , 2007, Nature.

[14]  J. Maris,et al.  Safety and activity of crizotinib for paediatric patients with refractory solid tumours or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: a Children's Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  N. Rosenfeld,et al.  Osimertinib benefit in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with T790M-mutation detected by circulating tumour DNA , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  J. I. Bell,et al.  Effect of heparin on polymerase chain reaction , 1994, The Lancet.

[17]  M. Choti,et al.  Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human Malignancies , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[18]  Claire L Weston,et al.  beta-Catenin status predicts a favorable outcome in childhood medulloblastoma: the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Brain Tumour Committee. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Li Ding,et al.  Germline Mutations in Predisposition Genes in Pediatric Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Heather L. Mulder,et al.  Targetable kinase-activating lesions in Ph-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  W. Evans,et al.  A subtype of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with poor treatment outcome: a genome-wide classification study. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[22]  Alison S. Devonshire,et al.  Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification , 2014, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[23]  B. Knoppers Paediatric research and the communication of not-so incidental findings. , 2012, Paediatrics & child health.

[24]  H. Saal,et al.  Ethical and Policy Issues in Genetic Testing and Screening of Children , 2013, Pediatrics.

[25]  M. Loh,et al.  Mutational landscape, clonal evolution patterns, and role of RAS mutations in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Achieving a Major Molecular Response at the Time of a Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCgR) Predicts a Better Duration of CCgR in Imatinib-Treated Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[27]  Yunis Ej,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detection of MYCN oncogene amplification in neuroblastoma using paraffin-embedded tissues. , 1995 .

[28]  C. Mullighan,et al.  Genomics in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: insights and treatment implications , 2015, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[29]  David S. K. Lu,et al.  Association of AR-V7 on Circulating Tumor Cells as a Treatment-Specific Biomarker With Outcomes and Survival in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[30]  Joshua L. Deignan,et al.  A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories , 2016, Genetics in Medicine.

[31]  Lynda Chin,et al.  Identification of Double-stranded Genomic DNA Spanning All Chromosomes with Mutated KRAS and p53 DNA in the Serum Exosomes of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  Salvatore Piscuoglio,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid-derived circulating tumour DNA better represents the genomic alterations of brain tumours than plasma , 2015, Nature Communications.

[33]  Michelle N Wurst,et al.  Clinical Validation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Genomic Oncology Panel via Cross-Platform Benchmarking against Established Amplicon Sequencing Assays. , 2017, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[34]  Noah C Welker,et al.  Fragment Length of Circulating Tumor DNA , 2016, PLoS genetics.

[35]  Shuji Ogino,et al.  Bayesian analysis and risk assessment in genetic counseling and testing. , 2004, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[36]  C. Stiller,et al.  An estimate of the heritable fraction of childhood cancer. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[37]  S. Jewell,et al.  Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology Review Effect of Fixatives and Tissue Processing on the Content and Integrity of Nucleic Acids , 2022 .

[38]  S. Ellard,et al.  Amplification of PCR products in excess of 600 base pairs using DNA extracted from decalcified, paraffin wax embedded bone marrow trephine biopsies , 2000, Molecular pathology : MP.

[39]  W. Chung,et al.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics , 2016, Genetics in Medicine.

[40]  A. McGuire,et al.  Potential Psychosocial Risks of Sequencing Newborns , 2016, Pediatrics.

[41]  Marc S. Williams,et al.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[42]  D. Ellison,et al.  Wnt/Wingless Pathway Activation and Chromosome 6 Loss Characterise a Distinct Molecular Sub-Group of Medulloblastomas Associated with a Favourable Prognosis , 2006, Cell cycle.

[43]  Stephanie A Cohen,et al.  Cancer Genetic Counselors’ Current Practices and Attitudes Related to the Use of Tumor Profiling , 2017, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[44]  Kejian Zhang,et al.  Misleading results from saliva samples of patients post-BMT in exome analyses. , 2014, Blood.

[45]  B. Crompton,et al.  Multicenter Feasibility Study of Tumor Molecular Profiling to Inform Therapeutic Decisions in Advanced Pediatric Solid Tumors: The Individualized Cancer Therapy (iCat) Study. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[46]  J. Radich,et al.  Role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in FLT3/ITD-positive AML. , 2006, Blood.

[47]  Pieter Wesseling,et al.  RNA-Seq of Tumor-Educated Platelets Enables Blood-Based Pan-Cancer, Multiclass, and Molecular Pathway Cancer Diagnostics , 2015, Cancer cell.

[48]  Jonathan M Marron,et al.  Patient/parent perspectives on genomic tumor profiling of pediatric solid tumors: The Individualized Cancer Therapy (iCat) experience , 2016, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[49]  J. Ptak,et al.  Detection of tumor-derived DNA in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with primary tumors of the brain and spinal cord , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.