Depth-of-field comparison between the plenoptic camera 1.0 and 2.0

Plenoptic cameras capture the spatial and angular information of a scene. The use of plenoptic cameras in areas such as research, microscopy, industry and consumer markets has steadily increased over the past two decades. When designing a plenoptic camera a decision must always be made between spatial and angular resolution. Many factors such as the size and number of microlenses in a microlens array or the relative position of the microlens array and sensor to the main lens play a role. Here we examine the two most common designs of plenoptic cameras. The plenoptic cameras 1.0, also called the unfocused plenoptic camera, and the plenoptic cameras 2.0, the focused plenoptic camera. We derive the mathematical equations that describe the connection between spatial and angular resolution. Supported by experimental results we show the relationship between the equations and a real object with different object distances taken from the plenoptic camera 1.0 and 2.0. These analyzes make it easier for researchers and engineers to choose the right camera design for a particular application. The user only has to determine beforehand which depth-of-field or which spatial resolution is needed.

[1]  Liang Gao,et al.  On the fundamental comparison between unfocused and focused light field cameras. , 2018, Applied optics.

[2]  P. Hanrahan,et al.  Digital light field photography , 2006 .

[3]  Andrew Lumsdaine,et al.  The focused plenoptic camera , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP).

[4]  Tom E. Bishop,et al.  The Light Field Camera: Extended Depth of Field, Aliasing, and Superresolution , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  P. Hanrahan,et al.  Light Field Photography with a Hand-held Plenoptic Camera , 2005 .

[6]  Haoyu Li,et al.  Fast, volumetric live-cell imaging using high-resolution light-field microscopy. , 2019, Biomedical optics express.

[7]  Xavier Levecq,et al.  Comparison of reconstruction approaches for plenoptic imaging systems , 2018, Photonics Europe.

[8]  Leonard McMillan,et al.  Dynamically reparameterized light fields , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[9]  G. Lippmann Epreuves reversibles donnant la sensation du relief , 1908 .

[10]  Oliver Bimber,et al.  Light-Field Microscopy: A Review , 2019, Journal of Neurology & Neuromedicine.

[11]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Single Lens Stereo with a Plenoptic Camera , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Andrew Lumsdaine,et al.  Depth of Field in Plenoptic Cameras , 2009, Eurographics.

[13]  Lennart Wietzke,et al.  Single lens 3D-camera with extended depth-of-field , 2012, Electronic Imaging.

[14]  A. Lumsdaine Full Resolution Lightfield Rendering , 2008 .

[15]  Andrew Lumsdaine,et al.  Focused plenoptic camera and rendering , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.