Understanding the Dynamics of Emergency Communication: Propositions for a Four-Channel Model

Researchers from a variety of fields have demonstrated the importance of communication in the management of emergencies. In fact, communication is arguably a core function that, if practiced effectively, can significantly enhance preparedness, improve coordination and cooperation, empower the public, facilitate logistics, reduce public anxiety and generally limit and mitigate harm. Much of this research on emergency communication, however, fails to capture the complex elements of the communication process, including the multiple stakeholders involved, the complex interactions between agencies, the diverse needs of various publics and the evolving role of the mass media and new communication technologies including social networks. While emergency management approaches typically view communication as a static, one-way process, current approaches emphasize the dynamic features of communication.In this work, we seek to characterize the role of the public as participants (via social networking) in the process of emergency communication. In doing so, we draw upon research associated with communication between emergency response agencies on mass media and disasters. A four-channel model of communication is proposed as a way to connect previous research and represent the dynamics of emergency communication taking into account the use of new mobile technologies especially cell phones and internet-based tools. We argue that this model offers a technological enhancement to the use of emergent networks commonly found in the aftermath of large-scale emergencies. We then discuss ways in which the four-channel model could change the characterization of the emergency management communication structure.

[1]  D. Neal,et al.  Effective emergency management: reconsidering the bureaucratic approach. , 1995, Disasters.

[2]  Dennis E. Wenger,et al.  Local and National Media Coverage of Disaster: A Content Analysis of the Print Media's Treatment of Disaster Myths , 1986, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[3]  T. Drabek.  Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings , 2011 .

[4]  Enrico L Quarantelli,et al.  Problematical aspects of the information/ communication revolution for disaster planning and research: ten non‐technical issues and questions , 1997 .

[5]  N. Kapucu.  Interagency Communication Networks During Emergencies , 2006 .

[6]  M. Vanderford,et al.  Emergency Communication Challenges in Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , 2007 .

[7]  D. Mileti,et al.  The Causal Sequence of Risk Communication in the Parkfield Earthquake Prediction Experiment , 1992 .

[8]  Matthew W. Seeger,et al.  Communication and Organizational Crisis , 2003 .

[9]  K. Weick.  ENACTED SENSEMAKING IN CRISIS SITUATIONS[1] , 1988 .

[10]  Mathew G. Isbell,et al.  Communicating Crisis: Interorganizational Collaboration Among Disaster Relief Agencies , 2006 .

[11]  T. Drabek.  Managing the Emergency Response. , 1985 .

[12]  Stephen W. Littlejohn.  Theories of Human Communication , 1978 .

[13]  J. Garner,et al.  Masters of the Universe? Resource Dependency and Interorganizational Power Relationships at NASA , 2006 .

[14]  E. L. Quarantelli,et al.  Planning and Management for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Disasters, Especially in a Metropolitan Context: Initial Questions and Issues Which Need to be Addressed , 1986 .

[15]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Interorganizational Learning Before 9/11 , 2005 .

[16]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Learning about Interoperability for Emergency Response: Geographic Information Technologies and the World Trade Center Crisis , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[17]  Barbara J Reynolds,et al.  Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication as an Integrative Model , 2005, Journal of health communication.

[18]  Erik Auf der Heide,et al.  Disaster Response: Principles of Preparation and Coordination , 1989 .

[19]  David A. McEntire,et al.  Emergent Phenomena and Multiorganizational Coordination in Disasters: Lessons from the Research Literature , 2002, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[20]  E L Quarantelli,et al.  Ten criteria for evaluating the management of community disasters. , 1997, Disasters.

[21]  Enrico L Quarantelli,et al.  CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DISASTER PLANNING IN AN URBAN SETTING , 1988 .

[22]  Denis McQuail,et al.  Communication models for the study of mass communications , 1981 .

[23]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events , 2009 .

[24]  Thomas E. Drabek,et al.  Strategies for Coordinating Disaster Responses , 2003 .

[25]  A. Michael Noll,et al.  Crisis Communications: Lessons from September 11 , 2003 .

[26]  E. Quarantelli.  DISASTER CRISIS MANAGEMENT: A SUMMARY OF RESEARCH FINDINGS , 1988 .

[27]  A. Boin,et al.  New Trends in Crisis Management Practice and Crisis Management Research: Setting the Agenda , 2001 .

[28]  M. Lindell,et al.  Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities , 2003 .