RapidNano: Towards 20nm Particle Detection on EUV Mask Blanks

Cleanliness is a prerequisite for obtaining economically feasible yield levels in the semiconductor industry. For the next generation of lithographic equipment, EUV lithography, the size of yield-loss inducing particles for the masks will be smaller than 20 nm. Consequently, equipment for handling EUV masks should not add particles larger than 20 nm. Detection methods for 20 nm particles on large area surfaces are needed to qualify the equipment for cleanliness. Detection of 20 nm particles is extremely challenging, not only because of the particle size, but also because of the large surface area and limited available time. In 2002 TNO developed the RapidNano, a platform that is capable of detecting nanoparticles on flat substrates. Over the last decade, the smallest detectable particle size was decreased while the inspection rate was increased. This effort has led to a stable and affordable detection platform that is capable of inspecting the full surface of a mask blank. The core of RapidNano is a dark-field imaging technique. Every substrate type has a typical background characteristic, which strongly affects the size of the smallest detectable particle. The noise level is induced by the speckle generated by the surface roughness of the mask. The signal-to-noise ratio can be improved by illuminating the inspection area from nine different angles. This improvement was first shown on test bench level and then applied in the RapidNano3. The RapidNano3 is capable of detecting 42nm latex sphere equivalents (and larger) on silicon surfaces. RapidNano4, the next generation, will use 193 nm light and the same nine angle illumination mode. Camera sensitivity and available laser power determine the achievable throughput. Therefore, special care was given to the optical design, particularly the optical path. With RapidNano4, TNO will push the detection limit of defects on EUV blanks to below 20nm.

[1]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  J. Vlieger,et al.  Light scattering by a sphere on a substrate , 1986 .

[3]  Hakseung Han,et al.  EUV blank inspection , 2008, European Mask and Lithography Conference.

[4]  J. C. J. van der Donck,et al.  Particle qualification procedure for the TNO EUV reticle load port module of the HamaTech MaskTrackPro cleaning tool , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Progress on EUV pellicle development , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Shmoolik Mangan,et al.  Applicability of e-beam mask inspection to EUV mask production , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Sandro Hannemann,et al.  Implementation of background scattering variance reduction on the rapid nano particle scanner , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  J. Goodman Some fundamental properties of speckle , 1976 .

[9]  J. C. J. van der Donck,et al.  TNO reticle handling test platform , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Jay L. Devore,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences , 1982 .

[11]  Diederik J. Maas,et al.  Nanoparticle detection limits of TNO's Rapid Nano: modeling and experimental results , 2012, Photomask Technology.

[12]  T. Hattori,et al.  Detection of 30–40-nm Particles on Bulk-Silicon and SOI Wafers Using Deep UV Laser Scattering , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing.

[13]  Richard Versluis,et al.  Increased particle inspection sensitivity by reduction of background scatter variance , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Mehdi Vaez-Iravani,et al.  Wafer inspection technology challenges for ULSI manufacturing , 1998 .

[15]  G. B. Derksen,et al.  Optimized qualification protocol on particle cleanliness for EUV mask infrastructure , 2011, Photomask Technology.

[16]  J. C. J. van der Donck,et al.  Investigating the intrinsic cleanliness of automated handling designed for EUV mask pod-in-pod systems , 2011, Photomask Technology.