Perception of dynamic audiotactile feedback to gesture input

In this paper we present results of a study where perception of dynamic audiotactile feedback to gesture input was examined. Our main motivation was to investigate how users' active input and different modality conditions effect the perception of the feedback. The experimental prototype in the study was a handheld sensor-actuator device that responds dynamically to user's hand movements creating an impression of a virtual texture. The feedback was designed so that the amplitude and frequency of texture were proportional to the overall angular velocity of the device. We used four different textures with different velocity responses. The feedback was presented to the user by the tactile actuator in the device, by audio through headphones, or by both. During the experiments, textures were switched in random intervals and the task of the user was to detect the changes while moving the device freely. The performances of the users with audio or audiotactile feedback were quite equal while tactile feedback alone yielded poorer performance. The texture design didn't influence the movement velocity or periodicity but tactile feedback induced most and audio feedback the least energetic motion. In addition, significantly better performance was achieved with slower motion. We also found that significant learning happened over time; detection accuracy increased significantly during and between the experiments. The masking noise used in tactile modality condition did not significantly influence the detection accuracy when compared to acoustic blocking but it increased the average detection time.

[1]  K. Mononen The effects of augmented feedback on motor skill learning in shooting : a feedback training intervention among inexperienced rifle shooters , 2007 .

[2]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Parchment-skin illusion: sound-biased touch , 1998, Current Biology.

[3]  Rauno Pääkkönen,et al.  Noise attenuation and proper insertion of earplugs into ear canals. , 2002, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[4]  Lorna M. Brown,et al.  A first investigation into the effectiveness of Tactons , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[5]  Michael Rohs,et al.  Explorations in sound for tilting-based interfaces , 2006, ICMI '06.

[6]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Designing audio and tactile crossmodal icons for mobile devices , 2007, ICMI '07.

[7]  David G. Behm,et al.  Effects of noise and music on human and task performance: A systematic review , 2008 .

[8]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Nonverbal Communication: The Hand's Role in Talking and Thinking , 2007 .

[9]  Ian Oakley,et al.  Did you feel something? Distracter tasks and the recognition of vibrotactile cues , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[10]  Roderick Murray-Smith,et al.  Audio feedback for gesture recognition , 2002 .

[11]  Vuokko Lantz,et al.  Dynamic audiotactile feedback in gesture interaction , 2008, Mobile HCI.

[12]  Roope Raisamo,et al.  Emotional and behavioral responses to haptic stimulation , 2008, CHI.

[13]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Relative performance using haptic and/or touch-produced auditory cues in a remote absolute texture identification task , 2003, 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2003. HAPTICS 2003. Proceedings..

[14]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .