An Overdetermined System of Transform Equations in Support of Robust DCE-MRI Registration With Outlier Rejection

Quantitative hepatic perfusion parameters derived by fitting dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of liver to a pharmacokinetic model are prone to errors if the dynamic images are not corrected for respiratory motion by image registration. The contrast-induced intensity variations in pre- and postcontrast phases pose challenges for the accuracy of image registration. We propose an overdetermined system of transformation equations between the image volumes in the DCE-MRI series to achieve robust alignment. In this method, we register each volume to every other volume. From the transforms produced by all pairwise registrations, we constructed an overdetermined system of transform equations that was solved robustly by minimizing the L1/2-norm of the residuals. This method was evaluated on a set of 100 liver DCE-MRI examinations from 35 patients by examining the area under spikes appearing in the voxel time–intensity curves. The robust alignment procedure significantly reduced the area under intensity spikes compared with unregistered volumes (P < .001) and volumes registered to a single reference phase (P < .001). Our registration procedure provides a larger number of reliable time–intensity curve samples. The additional reliable samples in the precontrast baseline are important for calculating the postcontrast signal enhancement and thereby for converting intensity to contrast concentration. On the intensity ramp, retained samples help to better describe the uptake dynamics, providing a better foundation for parameter estimation. The presented method also simplifies the analysis of data sets with many patients by eliminating the need for manual intervention during registration.

[1]  Randall K Ten Haken,et al.  Arterial perfusion imaging-defined subvolume of intrahepatic cancer. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Volume and Shape Preservation of Enhancing Lesions when Applying Non-rigid Registration to a Time Series of Contrast Enhancing MR Breast Images , 2000, MICCAI.

[3]  D Atkinson,et al.  Registration of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a progressive principal component registration (PPCR) , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Ganesh Adluru,et al.  Model‐based registration for dynamic cardiac perfusion MRI , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Tong San Koh,et al.  Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. , 2010, World journal of gastroenterology.

[7]  T. Wong,et al.  Automatic motion correction for breast MR imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[8]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Temporal Groupwise Registration for Motion Modeling , 2011, IPMI.

[9]  Michael Brady,et al.  Analysis of dynamic MR breast images using a model of contrast enhancement , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Daniel Normolle,et al.  Liver function after irradiation based on computed tomographic portal vein perfusion imaging. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Daniel Normolle,et al.  The prediction of radiation-induced liver dysfunction using a local dose and regional venous perfusion model. , 2007, Medical physics.

[12]  David Atkinson,et al.  Respiratory motion correction in dynamic MRI using robust data decomposition registration - Application to DCE-MRI , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Claude B. Sirlin,et al.  Automated registration of sequential breath-hold dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: a comparison of three techniques. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  Pauline Ferry,et al.  Dual registration of abdominal motion for motility assessment in free-breathing data sets acquired using dynamic MRI , 2014 .

[15]  Yue Cao,et al.  Physiological imaging-defined, response-driven subvolumes of a tumor. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Angela Caunce,et al.  Tracer kinetic model–driven registration for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI time‐series data , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Daniel K Sodickson,et al.  Motion-guided low-rank plus sparse (L+S) reconstruction for free-breathing dynamic MRI , 2013 .

[18]  Yue Cao,et al.  The promise of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging in radiation therapy. , 2011, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[19]  Michael Brady,et al.  Simultaneous Multiple Image Registration Method for T1 Estimation in Breast MRI Images , 2006, MICCAI.

[20]  D Atkinson,et al.  Dual registration of abdominal motion for motility assessment in free-breathing data sets acquired using dynamic MRI , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Daniel Normolle,et al.  Prediction of liver function by using magnetic resonance-based portal venous perfusion imaging. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  H. Buchtel,et al.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging As a Biomarker for Prediction of Radiation-Induced Neurocognitive Dysfunction , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Validation of Volume-Preserving Non-rigid Registration: Application to Contrast-Enhanced MR-Mammography , 2002, MICCAI.

[24]  Geoff J M Parker,et al.  Comparison of the performance of tracer kinetic model-driven registration for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using different models of contrast enhancement. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[25]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Simultaneous Registration of Multiple Images: Similarity Metrics and Efficient Optimization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.