Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect.

The SNARC (spatial numerical associations of response codes) effect reflects the tendency to respond faster with the left hand to relatively small numbers and with the right hand to relatively large numbers (S. Dehaene, S. Bossini, & P. Giraux, 1993). Using computational modeling, the present article aims to provide a framework for conceptualizing the SNARC effect. In line with models of spatial stimulus-response congruency, the authors modeled the SNARC effect as the result of parallel activation of preexisting links between magnitude and spatial representation and short-term links created on the basis of task instructions. This basic dual-route model simulated all characteristics associated with the SNARC effect. In addition, 2 experiments tested and confirmed new predictions derived from the model.

[1]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[2]  B. Hommel,et al.  Backward-compatibility effects with irrelevant stimulus-response overlap: the case of the SNARC effect. , 2004, The Journal of general psychology.

[3]  B. Hommel.  The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap , 1993 .

[4]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  Comparing correlated correlation coefficients , 1992 .

[5]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Samar Zebian,et al.  Linkages between Number Concepts, Spatial Thinking, and Directionality of Writing: The SNARC Effect and the REVERSE SNARC Effect in English and Arabic Monoliterates, Biliterates, and Illiterate Arabic Speakers , 2005 .

[7]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  A model of exact small-number representation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[9]  W Fias,et al.  Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  Daniela Mapelli,et al.  The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect? , 2003, Cognition.

[11]  W. Fias.  The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect , 1996 .

[12]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Vincent Walsh.  A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[16]  W. Schwarz,et al.  Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Wim Fias,et al.  Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects , 2005 .

[19]  W. Schwarz,et al.  Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[20]  B. Hommel.  Spontaneous decay of response-code activation , 1994, Psychological research.

[21]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  F. Valle-Inclán,et al.  The locus of interference in the Simon effect: an ERP study , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[25]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information , 1992 .

[26]  W. Banks,et al.  Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitudes of digits. , 1976 .

[27]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  W Fias,et al.  Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect , 2001, Psychological research.

[29]  Wim Fias,et al.  Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[30]  Wim Fias,et al.  Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[31]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Influence of Time Pressure in a Simple Response Task, a Choice- by-Location Task, and the Simon Task , 2001 .