Quick, Automatic, and General Activation of Orthographic and Phonological Representations in Young Readers.

Second through 6th graders were presented with nonword primes (orthographic, pseudohomophone, and control) and target words displayed for durations (30 and 60 ms) that were brief enough to prevent complete processing. Word reading skills were assessed by 3 word and nonword naming tasks. Good readers exhibited more orthographic priming than poor readers at both durations and more pseudohomophone priming at the short duration only. This suggests that good readers activate letter and phonemic information more efficiently than poor readers. Good readers also exhibited an equal amount of priming at both durations, whereas poor readers showed greater priming at the longer duration. This suggests that activation was not under strategic control. Finally, priming was reliable for both high- and low-frequency targets. This suggests that readers activate consistent information regardless of target word characteristics. Thus, quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological information in skilled readers results from the precision and redundancy of their lexical representations.

[1]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  G. C. Orden A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[3]  Changing Relations between Phonological Processing Abilities and Word-Level Reading as Children Develop from Beginning to Skilled Readers: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study. , 1997 .

[4]  C. Perfetti,et al.  A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English , 1995 .

[5]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking*1 , 1988 .

[6]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Reading isolated words: No evidence for automatic incorporation of the phonetic code , 1992, Psychological research.

[7]  F. Martin,et al.  A theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability , 1986 .

[8]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Does Word Identification Proceed From Spelling to Sound to Meaning , 1991 .

[9]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Speech Processes in Reading. , 1982 .

[10]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  M. Coltheart Lexical access in simple reading tasks , 1978 .

[12]  K. Paap,et al.  Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race , 1991 .

[13]  V. Laxon Children's Nonword Reading: Pseudohomophones, Neighbourhood Size, and Priming Effects. , 1995 .

[14]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Development of Sight Word Reading and Its Relationship to Recoding , 1992 .

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[16]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[17]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming , 1991 .

[18]  J. Bowey,et al.  Orthographic onsets and rimes as functional units of reading , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[19]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phonological access of the lexicon: evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones. , 1991 .

[20]  D. Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[22]  Orthographic rimes as functional units of reading in fourth‐grade children , 1992 .

[23]  G. Underwood Strategies of information processing , 1980 .

[24]  J. F. Stein,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Processing in Reading Disabled and Normal Children , 1995, Cortex.

[25]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  The Development of Automatic and Conscious Components of Contextual Facilitation. , 1983 .

[26]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[27]  M Coltheart,et al.  Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  The Growth of Children's Sight Vocabulary: A Quick Test with Educational and Theoretical Implications. Technical Report No. 330. , 1985 .

[29]  U. Goswami,et al.  Phonological priming and orthographic analogies in reading. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[30]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Anthony F. Jorm,et al.  An invited article: Phonological recoding and reading acquisition , 1983, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[32]  Norman J. Lass,et al.  Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice , 1979 .

[33]  H. Levin,et al.  CUES BY WHICH CHILDREN RECOGNIZE WORKS. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.

[34]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Development of Reading-Related Phonological Processing Abilities: New Evidence of Bidirectional Causality from a Latent Variable Longitudinal Study. , 1994 .

[35]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Automatic Contextual Facilitation in Readers of Three Ages. , 1978 .

[36]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Semantic and Associative Priming in a Distributed Attractor Network , 1995 .

[37]  K. Harris,et al.  Letter confusions and reversals of sequence in the beginning reader: implications for Orton's theory of developmental dyslexia. , 1971, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[38]  D. Plaut,et al.  Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. , 2000, Psychological review.

[39]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[40]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[42]  Frederick M. Schwantes Locus of the Context Effect in Children's Word Recognition. , 1981 .

[43]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  R Treiman To what extent do orthographic units in print mirror phonological units in speech? , 1994, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[45]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.

[46]  D. Share Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition , 1995, Cognition.

[47]  C. Perfetti The Representation Problem in Reading Acquisition , 1992 .

[48]  Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading , 1984 .