Dynamic Granger–Geweke causality modeling with application to interictal spike propagation

A persistent problem in developing plausible neurophysiological models of perception, cognition, and action is the difficulty of characterizing the interactions between different neural systems. Previous studies have approached this problem by estimating causal influences across brain areas activated during cognitive processing using structural equation modeling (SEM) and, more recently, with Granger–Geweke causality. While SEM is complicated by the need for a priori directional connectivity information, the temporal resolution of dynamic Granger–Geweke estimates is limited because the underlying autoregressive (AR) models assume stationarity over the period of analysis. We have developed a novel optimal method for obtaining data‐driven directional causality estimates with high temporal resolution in both time and frequency domains. This is achieved by simultaneously optimizing the length of the analysis window and the chosen AR model order using the SURE criterion. Dynamic Granger–Geweke causality in time and frequency domains is subsequently calculated within a moving analysis window. We tested our algorithm by calculating the Granger–Geweke causality of epileptic spike propagation from the right frontal lobe to the left frontal lobe. The results quantitatively suggested that the epileptic activity at the left frontal lobe was propagated from the right frontal lobe, in agreement with the clinical diagnosis. Our novel computational tool can be used to help elucidate complex directional interactions in the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Franklin F. Kuo,et al.  System analysis by digital computer , 1966 .

[2]  D. Cohen Magnetoencephalography: Evidence of Magnetic Fields Produced by Alpha-Rhythm Currents , 1968, Science.

[3]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[4]  C. Granger Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint , 1980 .

[5]  Ernst Fernando Lopes Da Silva Niedermeyer,et al.  Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , 1982 .

[6]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .

[7]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measures of Conditional Linear Dependence and Feedback between Time Series , 1984 .

[8]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Some algebraic properties of the Reticular Action Model for moment structures. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[9]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-Time Signal Pro-cessing , 1989 .

[10]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Large‐scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[12]  Michel Terraza,et al.  Testing for Causality , 1994 .

[13]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? , 1999, Neuron.

[14]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[15]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[16]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Koichi Sameshima,et al.  Using partial directed coherence to describe neuronal ensemble interactions , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[19]  G. Ermentrout,et al.  Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[22]  Arnold Neumaier,et al.  Estimation of parameters and eigenmodes of multivariate autoregressive models , 2001, TOMS.

[23]  Arnold Neumaier,et al.  Algorithm 808: ARfit—a matlab package for the estimation of parameters and eigenmodes of multivariate autoregressive models , 2001, TOMS.

[24]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  A signal estimation approach to functional MRI , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  W. Hesse,et al.  The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[26]  J. Martinerie,et al.  Statistical assessment of nonlinear causality: application to epileptic EEG signals , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Spectral spatiotemporal imaging of cortical oscillations and interactions in the human brain , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.

[31]  M. Kaminski,et al.  Granger causality and information flow in multivariate processes. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  Determination of EEG activity propagation: pair-wise versus multichannel estimate , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  S. Bressler,et al.  Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Michael Eichler,et al.  A graphical approach for evaluating effective connectivity in neural systems , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Nonstationary noise estimation in functional MRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[36]  H. Berger Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen , 1929, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[37]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[38]  Hans Berger,et al.  Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen , 1932, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[39]  Demis Basso,et al.  A new method for detecting causality in fMRI data of cognitive processing , 2006, Cognitive Processing.

[40]  Régine Le Bouquin-Jeannès,et al.  Linear and nonlinear causality between signals: methods, examples and neurophysiological applications , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[41]  S. Bressler,et al.  Frequency decomposition of conditional Granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potential data , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[42]  R. Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed influences between activated brain areas in a motor-response task using fMRI. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[43]  João Ricardo Sato,et al.  A method to produce evolving functional connectivity maps during the course of an fMRI experiment using wavelet-based time-varying Granger causality , 2006, NeuroImage.

[44]  Pedro A. Valdes-Sosa,et al.  Spatio-temporal autoregressive models defined over brain manifolds , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[45]  E. Formisano,et al.  Phase coupling in a cerebro-cerebellar network at 8-13 Hz during reading. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  S P Ahlfors,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic Mapping of Interictal Spike Propagation: A Technical and Clinical Report , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[47]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  Lexical influences on speech perception: A Granger causality analysis of MEG and EEG source estimates , 2008, NeuroImage.

[48]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Tracking the Time-Varying Cortical Connectivity Patterns by Adaptive Multivariate Estimators , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.