Region-Based Classification of Polarimetric SAR Images Using Wishart MRF

The scattering measurements of individual pixels in polarimetric SAR images are affected by speckle; hence, the performance of classification approaches, taking individual pixels as elements, would be damaged. By introducing the spatial relation between adjacent pixels, a novel classification method, taking regions as elements, is proposed using a Markov random field (MRF). In this method, an image is oversegmented into a large amount of rectangular regions first. Then, to use fully the statistical a priori knowledge of the data and the spatial relation of neighboring pixels, a Wishart MRF model, combining the Wishart distribution with the MRF, is proposed, and an iterative conditional mode algorithm is adopted to adjust oversegmentation results so that the shapes of all regions match the ground truth better. Finally, a Wishart-based maximum likelihood, based on regions, is used to obtain a classification map. Real polarimetric images are used in experiments. Compared with the other three frequently used methods, higher accuracy is observed, and classification maps are in better agreement with the initial ground maps, using the proposed method.

[1]  Dirk H. Hoekman,et al.  Initialization of Markov random field clustering of large remote sensing images , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Ridha Touzi,et al.  Segmentation of textured polarimetric SAR scenes by likelihood approximation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Yunhan Dong,et al.  Segmentation and classification of vegetated areas using polarimetric SAR image data , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Segmentation of polarimetric synthetic aperture radar data , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[5]  Pierre Moreels,et al.  Watershed identification of polygonal patterns in noisy SAR images , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  L. Ferro-Famil,et al.  Segmentation of polarimetric SAR images , 2001, IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217).

[7]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images , 1984 .

[8]  Eric Pottier,et al.  Quantitative comparison of classification capability: fully polarimetric versus dual and single-polarization SAR , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Jong-Kae Fwu,et al.  Design for HMM-based SAR ATR , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[10]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Intensity and phase statistics of multilook polarimetric and interferometric SAR imagery , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  C.F. Barnes,et al.  Late-Season Rural Land-Cover Estimation With Polarimetric-SAR Intensity Pixel Blocks and$sigma$-Tree-Structured Near-Neighbor Classifiers , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Thomas L. Ainsworth,et al.  Unsupervised classification using polarimetric decomposition and the complex Wishart classifier , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..