Full-reference visual quality assessment for synthetic images: A subjective study

Measuring visual quality, as perceived by human observers, is becoming increasingly important in the many applications in which humans are the ultimate consumers of visual information. For assessing subjective quality of natural images, such as those taken by optical cameras, significant progress has been made for several decades. To aid in the benchmarking of objective image quality assessment (IQA) algorithms, many natural image databases have been annotated with subjective ratings of the images by human observers. Similar information, however, is not as readily available for synthetic images commonly found in video games and animated movies. In this paper, our primary contributions are (1) conducting subjective tests on our publicly available ESPL Synthetic Image Database, and (2) evaluating the performance of more than 20 full reference IQA algorithms for natural images on the synthetic image database. The ESPL Synthetic Image Database contains 500 distorted images (20 distorted images for each of the 25 original images) in 1920 × 1080 format. After collecting 26000 individual human ratings, we compute the differential mean opinion score (DMOS) for each image to evaluate IQA algorithm performance.

[1]  Lei Zhang,et al.  RFSIM: A feature based image quality assessment metric using Riesz transforms , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[2]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Image quality assessment based on a degradation model , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  Theophano Mitsa,et al.  Evaluation of contrast sensitivity functions for the formulation of quality measures incorporated in halftoning algorithms , 1993, 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[4]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[6]  J. Astola,et al.  ON BETWEEN-COEFFICIENT CONTRAST MASKING OF DCT BASIS FUNCTIONS , 2007 .

[7]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  NoRM: No‐Reference Image Quality Metric for Realistic Image Synthesis , 2012, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[8]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  New measurements reveal weaknesses of image quality metrics in evaluating graphics artifacts , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[9]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[11]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Hongyu Li,et al.  SR-SIM: A fast and high performance IQA index based on spectral residual , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[13]  Sebastiano Battiato,et al.  Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems , 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  Hongyu Li,et al.  VSI: A Visual Saliency-Induced Index for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  David Zhang,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of full reference image quality assessment algorithms , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Nikolay N. Ponomarenko,et al.  A NEW FULL-REFERENCE QUALITY METRICS BASED ON HVS , 2006 .

[18]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[20]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Brian L. Evans,et al.  Spatial domain synthetic scene statistics , 2014, 2014 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[22]  Marco Carli,et al.  Modified image visual quality metrics for contrast change and mean shift accounting , 2011, 2011 11th International Conference The Experience of Designing and Application of CAD Systems in Microelectronics (CADSM).

[23]  Francesca De Simone,et al.  Subjective evaluation of JPEG XR image compression , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[24]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[25]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  VSNR: A Wavelet-Based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  Nikolay N. Ponomarenko,et al.  A New Color Image Database TID2013: Innovations and Results , 2013, ACIVS.

[27]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[28]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Based on Gradient Similarity , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.