Experimental comparison of measurement techniques for drop size distributions in liquid/liquid dispersions

An online measurement technique for drop size distribution in stirred tank reactors is needed but has not yet been developed. Different approaches and different techniques have been published as the new standard during the last decade. Three of them (focus beam reflectance measurement, two-dimensional optical reflectance measurement techniques and a fiber optical FBR sensor) are tested, and their results are compared with trustful image analysis results from an in situ microscope. The measurement of drop sizes in liquid/liquid distribution is a major challenge for all tested measurement probes, and none provides exact results for the tested system of pure toluene/water compared to an endoscope. Not only the size analysis but also the change of the size over time gives unreasonable results. The influence of the power input on the drop size distribution was the only reasonable observation in this study. The FBR sensor was not applicable at all to the used system. While all three probes are based on laser back scattering, the general question of the usability of this principle for measuring evolving drop size distributions in liquid/liquid system is asked. The exterior smooth surface of droplets in such systems is leading to strong errors in the measurement of the size of the drops. That leads to widely divergent results. A different measurement principle should be used for online measurements of drop size distributions than laser back scattering.

[1]  S. Rohani,et al.  Determination of Particle Size Distribution by Par-Tec® 100: Modeling and Experimental Results , 1998 .

[2]  Reinhard Polke,et al.  Laser Diffraction Spectrometers/Experience in Particle Size Analysis , 1984 .

[3]  M. Kraume,et al.  Influence of Physical Properties on Drop Size Distribution of Stirred Liquid‐Liquid Dispersions , 2004 .

[4]  Y. Pourcelot,et al.  Particle-size distribution of a powder : comparison of three analytical techniques , 1996 .

[5]  M. Kraume,et al.  On-line measurement technique for drop size distributions in liquid/liquid systems at high dispersed phase fractions , 2000 .

[6]  M. Kraume,et al.  The effect of pH on experimental and simulation results of transient drop size distributions in stirred liquid–liquid dispersions , 2006 .

[7]  Pui Shan Chow,et al.  Interpretation of Focused Beam Reflectance Measurement (FBRM) Data via Simulated Crystallization , 2008 .

[8]  Fritz Krafft,et al.  Otto von Guericke , 1978 .

[9]  Mingzhong Li,et al.  Determination of non-spherical particle size distribution from chord length measurements. Part 1: Theoretical analysis , 2005 .

[10]  T. Míšek.  Standard test systems for liquid extraction , 1985 .

[11]  E. Hurlburt,et al.  Measurement of drop size in horizontal annular flow with the immersion method , 2002 .

[12]  Parisa A. Bahri,et al.  Estimating Average Particle Size by Focused Beam Reflectance Measurement (FBRM) , 2002 .

[13]  Z. C. Liu,et al.  A backlighted imaging technique for particle size measurements in two-phase flows , 1998 .

[14]  Bruno H. Zimm.  Light Scattering by Small Particles. Structure of Matter Series. , 1958 .

[15]  Christophe Gourdon,et al.  Experimental study of drop size distributions at high phase ratio in liquid–liquid dispersions , 2003 .

[16]  Wolfgang Marquardt,et al.  Process Analysis by Means of Focused Beam Reflectance Measurements , 2009 .

[17]  Carolyn A. Koh,et al.  Measuring the particle size of a known distribution using the focused beam reflectance measurement technique , 2008 .

[18]  J. Kiehl,et al.  Narrow resonance structure in the Mie scattering characteristics. , 1978, Applied optics.

[19]  M. Mazzotti,et al.  Modeling and Experimental Analysis of PSD Measurements through FBRM , 2000 .

[20]  Alan M. O’Rourke,et al.  A comparison of measurement techniques used in the analysis of evolving liquid–liquid dispersions , 2005 .

[21]  Karen A. McDonald,et al.  Characterization of plant suspension cultures using the focused beam reflectance technique , 2001, Biotechnology Letters.

[22]  A. Pacek,et al.  Measurement of Drop Size Distribution in Concentrated Liquid-Liquid Dispersions - Video and Capillary Techniques , 1995 .

[23]  Barry J. Azzopardi,et al.  Comparison of laser-based drop-size measurement techniques and their application to dispersed liquid-liquid pipe flow , 2000 .

[24]  Panagiota Angeli,et al.  Evaluation of drop size distribution from chord length measurements , 2006 .

[25]  Lawrence L. Tavlarides,et al.  Laser capillary spectrophotometry for drop-size concentration measurements , 1989 .

[26]  A. Pacek,et al.  Video technique for measuring dynamics of liquid‐liquid dispersion during phase inversion , 1994 .

[27]  Droplet Size Distribution of Technical Macroemulsions: Variation of Process Parameters , 2007 .

[28]  L. Fradette,et al.  Effect of dispersed phase viscosity on solid-stabilized emulsions , 2009 .

[29]  P Angeli,et al.  Scale-down studies on the hydrodynamics of two-liquid phase biocatalytic reactors , 2002, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[30]  Marco Mazzotti,et al.  Restoration of PSD from Chord Length Distribution Data using the Method of Projections onto Convex Sets , 2005 .

[31]  Panagiota Angeli,et al.  Drop size distribution in highly concentrated liquid–liquid dispersions using a light back scattering method , 2005 .

[32]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  Comparison of Particle Size Distributions Measured Using Different Techniques , 2005 .

[33]  B. Binks.  Particles as surfactants—similarities and differences , 2002 .

[34]  Dispergierung und Phasentrennung in gerührten Flüssig/flüssig-Systemen , 2002 .

[35]  Carolyn A. Koh,et al.  Measurement and Calibration of Droplet Size Distributions in Water-in-Oil Emulsions by Particle Video Microscope and a Focused Beam Reflectance Method , 2010 .

[36]  B. Glennon,et al.  Characterizing the metastable zone width and solubility curve using lasentec FBRM and PVM , 2002 .

[37]  Juan C. Lasheras,et al.  On the breakup of an air bubble injected into a fully developed turbulent flow. Part 1. Breakup frequency , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  B. Binks.  Particles as surfactantssimilarities and differences , 2002 .