PP-verbs: The phenomenon of obligatory Ps (in Hebrew)

Abstract The paper focuses on Hebrew verbs whose internal argument is realized obligatorily as a PP, rather than a DP (PP-verbs) and develops a principled account, as to the occurrence of the PP and the function of P with these verbs. The main claim advanced in the paper, The Underspecification Hypothesis, couched in the Theta System framework ( Reinhart, 2002 ), defines these verbs as having an underspecified internal θ-role, rendering them incapable of Case-checking. Addressing the semantic and syntactic consequences of ⿿underspecification⿿, I illustrate the semantic effects of the ⿿fully specified⿿/⿿underspecified⿿ distinction, and argue that the role of P in PP-verb constructions, unlike in locative constructions, is to check the Case of its DP complement, rather than to assign it a θ-role. Consequently, I provide evidence for the status of P as an independent syntactic head, projecting a thematically licensed PP. Finally, I discuss the proposal from a cross-linguistic perspective, using the variation attested between Hebrew PP-verbs and their Russian and English counterparts, and suggest specific sources for the observed cross-linguistic variation.

[1]  Marcel den Dikken,et al.  Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic and Causative Constructions , 1995 .

[2]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[3]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[4]  Edit Doron,et al.  Agency and Voice: The Semantics of the Semitic Templates , 2003 .

[5]  Tanya Reinhart,et al.  The Theta System – an overview , 2003 .

[6]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Minimalist inquiries : the framework , 1998 .

[7]  Marijana Marelj.  Rules that govern the cooccurences of theta-clusters in the ‘Theta-System’ , 2003 .

[8]  Noam Chomsky.  A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[9]  Marijana Marelj,et al.  Middles and Argument Structure across Languages , 2013 .

[10]  Erhard W. Hinrichs,et al.  A compositional semantics for aktionsarten and NP reference in English , 1985 .

[11]  Richard Thomas Oehrle,et al.  The grammatical status of the English dative alternation , 1976 .

[12]  Tim Stowell,et al.  Origins of phrase structure , 1981 .

[13]  Stanley Dubinsky,et al.  On Extraction From NPS , 2003 .

[14]  Höskuldur Thráinsson,et al.  Prepositions and minimalist Case-marking , 1996 .

[15]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics , 1989 .

[16]  A. Kratzer.  Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[17]  David R. Dowty.  Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[18]  Peter Svenonius.  Case Alternations in the Icelandic Passive , 2005 .

[19]  Teun Hoekstra,et al.  Small clause results , 1988 .

[20]  Gert Webelhuth,et al.  Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation , 1992 .

[21]  A. Belletti,et al.  Psych-verbs and θ-theory , 1988 .

[22]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[23]  Joseph E. Emonds,et al.  A unified theory of syntactic categories , 1985 .

[24]  H. V. Riemsdijk.  Categorial feature magnetism: The endocentricity and distribution of projections , 1998 .

[25]  I. Landau.  The Locative Syntax of Experiencers , 2009 .

[26]  Josef Bayer,et al.  Morphological underspecification meets oblique case : syntactic and processing effects in German , 2001 .

[27]  Richard S. Kayne.  Prepositions as Probes , 2007 .

[28]  A. Hestvik.  Subjectless binding domains , 1991 .

[29]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[30]  Gisa Rauh.  Approaches to prepositions , 1991 .

[31]  R. Oehrle,et al.  Books Awaiting Review , 1984, CL.

[32]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[33]  T. Reinhart.  Anaphora and semantic interpretation , 1983 .

[34]  T. Reinhart,et al.  The Lexicon-Syntax Parameter: Reflexivization and Other Arity Operations , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[35]  Richard S. Kayne.  The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[36]  Richard S. Kayne.  On some Prepositions that Look DP-internal , 2002 .

[37]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Icelandic Case and the Structure of Events , 2002 .

[38]  T. Reinhart.  The theta system: syntactic realization of verbal concepts , 2000 .

[39]  L. Haegeman.  Elements of Grammar , 1997 .

[40]  H. Verkuyl.  A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure , 1996 .

[41]  R. Larson.  On the double object construction , 1988 .

[42]  J. Maling.  Dative: The heterogeneity of the mapping among morphological case, grammatical functions, and thematic roles , 2001 .

[43]  Richard S. Kayne.  Connectedness and binary branching , 1984 .

[44]  Ken Hale,et al.  The syntactic character of thematic structure , 1992 .

[45]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure , 1997 .

[46]  Thomas McFadden,et al.  The Rise of the To−Dative in Middle English , 2002 .