Virtual bead representation and surface roughness evaluation challenges for additive manufacturing material extrusion processes

Additive manufacturing (AM) processes, such as material extrusion, are part of a popular growing technology field; with limited human assistance required and advanced rapid prototyping capabilities, this technology is advertised to have limitless possibilities. The common challenge faced by users is a lack of design control of the surface roughness, which is highlighted by a characteristic “stair case” layering effect at the boundary. Focusing on material extrusion processes, the goal of this research is to model representative bead shapes, and highlight the surface roughness challenges for assessing boundary-fill regions. Various bead shapes are explored and compared through virtual simulation. Unique material extrusion AM-related issues arise, and it is shown that machining solutions may not provide the desired surface smoothness. This research illustrates that specific physical and virtual assessment tools and standards need to be further developed to convey surface roughness attributes for material extrusion additive manufactured components.

[1]  D. Rosen,et al.  Use of parameter estimation for stereolithography surface finish improvement , 2008 .

[2]  N. Venkata Reddy,et al.  Improvement of surface finish by staircase machining in fused deposition modeling , 2003 .

[3]  S. Pugalendhi.  Experimental Investigation of Surface Roughness for Fused Deposition Modelled Part with Different Angular Orientation , 2012 .

[4]  Jill Urbanic,et al.  Visualizing, analyzing, and managing voids in the material extrusion process , 2018 .

[5]  Philip E. Reeves,et al.  Reducing the surface deviation of stereolithography using in‐process techniques , 1997 .

[6]  Han Tong Loh,et al.  Considerations and selection of optimal orientation for different rapid prototyping systems , 1999 .

[7]  Robert W. Hedrick,et al.  Virtual quality assessment tools for material extrusion processes , 2017 .

[8]  A. K. Sood,et al.  Weighted principal component approach for improving surface finish of ABS plastic parts built through fused deposition modelling process , 2011 .

[9]  Siba Sankar Mahapatra,et al.  Bayesian regularization-based Levenberg–Marquardt neural model combined with BFOA for improving surface finish of FDM processed part , 2012 .

[10]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Selection of optimal part orientation in fused deposition modelling using swarm intelligence , 2007 .

[11]  C. J. Luis Pérez,et al.  Analysis of the surface roughness and dimensional accuracy capability of fused deposition modelling processes , 2002 .

[12]  Luis Matey,et al.  PolyJet technology for product prototyping: Tensile strength and surface roughness properties , 2014 .

[13]  Andrea Gatto,et al.  Benchmarking of Rapid Prototyping Techniques in Terms of Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Finish , 1995 .

[14]  Ruth Jill Urbanic,et al.  Material bead deposition with 2 + 2 ½ multi-axis machining process planning strategies with virtual verification for extruded geometry , 2018 .

[15]  Brian K. Paul,et al.  Effect of Layer Thickness and Orientation Angle on Surface Roughness in Laminated Object Manufacturing , 2001 .

[16]  Juntong Xi,et al.  Adaptive direct slicing with non-uniform cusp heights for rapid prototyping , 2004 .

[17]  S. Arunachalam,et al.  Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling , 2001 .

[18]  L. Love,et al.  Structure and mechanical behavior of Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM) materials , 2017 .

[19]  Ian Gibson,et al.  Improving surface quality of selective laser sintered rapid prototype parts using robotic finishing , 2000 .

[20]  T V Vorburger,et al.  Surface finish metrology tutorial , 1990 .

[21]  K.K.B. Hon,et al.  Optimising build parameters for improved surface finish in stereolithography , 1998 .

[22]  Sanjay G. Dhande,et al.  Virtual hybrid-FDM system to enhance surface finish , 2006 .

[23]  Alberto Boschetto,et al.  Modelling micro geometrical profiles in fused deposition process , 2012 .

[24]  N. Venkata Reddy,et al.  Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling , 2004 .

[25]  Andrew J. Pinkerton,et al.  The effect of laser pulse width on multiple-layer 316L steel clad microstructure and surface finish , 2003 .

[26]  Luigi Maria Galantucci,et al.  Experimental study aiming to enhance the surface finish of fused deposition modeled parts , 2009 .

[27]  H. S. Byun,et al.  Determination of the optimal part orientation in layered manufacturing using a genetic algorithm , 2005 .

[28]  Seok-Hee Lee,et al.  Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling , 2009 .

[29]  T. Adams,et al.  A Simple Algorithm to Relate Measured Surface Roughness to Equivalent Sand-grain Roughness , 2012 .

[30]  Gavin D. MacAulay,et al.  Surface texture measurement for additive manufacturing , 2015 .