Cost-Effectiveness of Total Disc Replacement Versus Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Norwegian Multicenter RCT
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Lydersen | I. Rossvoll | J. Brox | K. Storheim | G. Leivseth | F. Borgström | Ø. Nygaard | P. Fritzell | M. Rø | M. Pedersen | L. G. Johnsen | O. Grundnes | G. Olafsson | C. Hellum | Hege Andresen
[1] M. Grotle,et al. Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease , 2013, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
[2] A. Sadosky,et al. The Burden of Chronic Low Back Pain: Clinical Comorbidities, Treatment Patterns, and Health Care Costs in Usual Care Settings , 2012, Spine.
[3] G. Andersson,et al. Management of degenerative disk disease and chronic low back pain. , 2011, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.
[4] P. Paquis,et al. Medicoeconomic evaluation of total disc replacement based on French National Health Care System data. , 2011, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.
[5] J. Clarke,et al. What is a systematic review? , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.
[6] Leiv Sandvik,et al. Surgery with disc prosthesis versus rehabilitation in patients with low back pain and degenerative disc: two year follow-up of randomised study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[7] T. Solberg,et al. Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine? , 2011, Acta orthopaedica.
[8] H. Tropp,et al. Cost effectiveness of disc prosthesis versus lumbar fusion in patients with chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up , 2010, European Spine Journal.
[9] Bart W. Koes,et al. A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain , 2010, European Spine Journal.
[10] R. Ostelo,et al. Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature , 2010, European Spine Journal.
[11] D. Moher,et al. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, Trials.
[12] S. Kurtz,et al. National Revision Burden for Lumbar Total Disc Replacement in the United States: Epidemiologic and Economic Perspectives , 2010, Spine.
[13] D. Brunenberg,et al. The impact of differences in EQ-5D and SF-6D utility scores on the acceptability of cost-utility ratios: results across five trial-based cost-utility studies. , 2010, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[14] J. Doctor,et al. Health Utility Bias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytic Evaluation , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[15] J. Caro,et al. Can cost utility evaluations inform decision making about interventions for low back pain? , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[16] Xiong Guo,et al. Clinical diagnosis for discogenic low back pain , 2009, International journal of biological sciences.
[17] K. Muir,et al. Comparing Cost-Utility Estimates: Does the Choice of EQ-5D or SF-6D Matter? , 2009, Medical care.
[18] M. Kenward,et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[19] C. Bünger,et al. Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D in long-lasting low back pain. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[20] Roger Chou,et al. Surgery for Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline , 2009, Spine.
[21] J. Cairns,et al. SF-6D versus EQ-5D: reasons for differences in utility scores and impact on reported cost-utility , 2009, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[22] J. Katz,et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Spine Surgery: The Jury Is Out , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[23] Michael Kropf,et al. Results of the Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study of the ProDisc®-L Total Disc Replacement Versus Circumferential Fusion for the Treatment of 1-Level Degenerative Disc Disease , 2007, Spine.
[24] M. Mugford,et al. Exploring the cost effectiveness of an immunization programme for rotavirus gastroenteritis in the United Kingdom , 2007, Epidemiology and Infection.
[25] S. Kurtz,et al. Polyethylene Wear Debris and Long-term Clinical Failure of the Charité Disc Prosthesis: A Study of 4 Patients , 2007, Spine.
[26] J. V. van Eijk,et al. The Long-term Effect of Multidisciplinary Back Training: A Systematic Review , 2007, Spine.
[27] E. Carragee. Surgical treatment of lumbar disk disorders. , 2006, JAMA.
[28] T. Stijnen,et al. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[29] F. Christensen,et al. Health economic evaluation in lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic literature review anno 2005 , 2006, European Spine Journal.
[30] I. Holm,et al. Lumbar instrumented fusion compared with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic back pain after previous surgery for disc herniation: A prospective randomized controlled study , 2006, PAIN.
[31] H. V. van Stel,et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , 2006 .
[32] J. Katz,et al. A Review of the 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar Fusion Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial From the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group , 2006, Spine.
[33] N. van der Roer,et al. What is the most cost-effective treatment for patients with low back pain? A systematic review. , 2005, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.
[34] John E. Brazier,et al. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D , 2005, Quality of Life Research.
[35] B. Koes,et al. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[36] R. Delamarter,et al. Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States clinical trial. , 2005, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.
[37] Jeremy Fairbank,et al. Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[38] R. Collins,et al. Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[39] J. Brazier,et al. A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. , 2004, Health economics.
[40] A. Nordwall,et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Lumbar Fusion and Nonsurgical Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain in the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial From the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group , 2004, Spine.
[41] Inger Holm,et al. Randomized Clinical Trial of Lumbar Instrumented Fusion and Cognitive Intervention and Exercises in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Disc Degeneration , 2003, Spine.
[42] Inger Holm,et al. The Effect of Comprehensive Group Training on Cross-sectional Area, Density, and Strength of Paraspinal Muscles in Patients Sick-Listed for Subacute Low Back Pain , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.
[43] Andrew Briggs,et al. Missing... presumed at random: cost-analysis of incomplete data. , 2003, Health economics.
[44] W. Jacobs,et al. Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature , 2003, European Spine Journal.
[45] H. Bleichrodt. A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities. , 2002, Health economics.
[46] N. Zethraeus,et al. Definition, interpretation and calculation of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. , 2000, Health economics.
[47] S. Hallan,et al. Quality of life after cerebrovascular stroke: a systematic study of patients’ preferences for different functional outcomes , 1999, Journal of internal medicine.
[48] H. Ursin,et al. Five‐Year Follow‐Up Study of a Controlled Clinical Trial Using Light Mobilization and an Informative Approach to Low Back Pain , 1998, Spine.
[49] J. Brazier,et al. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[50] P. Dolan,et al. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. , 1997, Medical care.
[51] R. Brooks. EuroQol: the current state of play. , 1996, Health policy.
[52] A. Indahl,et al. Good Prognosis for Low Back Pain When Left Untampered: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 1995, Spine.
[53] S. Wilson. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes , 1987 .
[54] Annett Wechsler,et al. Applied Methods Of Cost Effectiveness Analysis In Healthcare , 2016 .
[55] B. Koes,et al. Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review , 2005, European Spine Journal.
[56] I. Holm,et al. Intensive group training versus cognitive intervention in sub-acute low back pain: short-term results of a single-blind randomized controlled trial. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.
[57] A. Witzmann. [Acupuncture and other forms of treatment for patients with chronic back pain]. , 2000, Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift.