An automated hand hygiene training system improves hand hygiene technique but not compliance.

INTRODUCTION The hand hygiene technique that the World Health Organization recommends for cleansing hands with soap and water or alcohol-based handrub consists of 7 poses. We used an automated training system to improve clinicians' hand hygiene technique and test whether this affected hospitalwide hand hygiene compliance. METHODS Seven hundred eighty-nine medical and nursing staff volunteered to participate in a self-directed training session using the automated training system. The proportion of successful first attempts was reported for each of the 7 poses. Hand hygiene compliance was collected according to the national requirement and rates for 2011-2014 were used to determine the effect of the training system on compliance. RESULTS The highest pass rate was for pose 1 (palm to palm) at 77% (606 out of 789), whereas pose 6 (clean thumbs) had the lowest pass rate at 27% (216 out of 789). One hundred volunteers provided feedback to 8 items related to satisfaction with the automated training system and most (86%) expressed a high degree of satisfaction and all reported that this method was time-efficient. There was no significant change in compliance rates after the introduction of the automated training system. Observed compliance during the posttraining period declined but increased to 82% in response to other strategies. CONCLUSIONS Technology for training clinicians in the 7 poses played an important education role but did not affect compliance rates.

[1]  M. Cruickshank,et al.  Outcomes from the first 2 years of the Australian National Hand Hygiene Initiative , 2011, The Medical journal of Australia.

[2]  M. Whitby,et al.  Why Healthcare Workers Don't Wash Their Hands: A Behavioral Explanation , 2006, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[3]  B. Allegranzi,et al.  The World Health Organization Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care and Their Consensus Recommendations , 2009, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[4]  A. Guastella,et al.  Biased Saccadic Responses to Emotional Stimuli in Anxiety: An Antisaccade Study , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  H. Sax,et al.  Mental models: a basic concept for human factors design in infection prevention. , 2015, The Journal of hospital infection.

[6]  M. McLaws,et al.  Doctor, do you have a moment? National Hand Hygiene Initiative compliance in Australian hospitals , 2014, The Medical journal of Australia.

[7]  M. Hannan,et al.  Improved hand hygiene technique and compliance in healthcare workers using gaming technology. , 2013, The Journal of hospital infection.

[8]  Gerard Lacey,et al.  Pilot evaluation of a ward-based automated hand hygiene training system. , 2013, American journal of infection control.

[9]  Alberto Maria Segre,et al.  Electronic Recognition of Hand Hygiene Technique and Duration , 2014, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[10]  H Humphreys,et al.  When are the hands of healthcare workers positive for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus? , 2010, The Journal of hospital infection.

[11]  Gerard Lacey,et al.  Efficacy of a New Educational Tool to Improve Handrubbing Technique amongst Healthcare Workers: A Controlled, Before-After Study , 2014, PloS one.