Social categorization and power differentials in group relations

This study investigated the independent effects of power differentials on intergroup behaviour. Using a variant of Tajfel's minimal group paradigm (Tajfel and Turner, 1979), subjects were arbitrarily categorized into groups of differing power (0-100 per cent) at two levels of salience. Subjects were asked to distribute resources to ingroup and outgroup others using Tajfel's matrices. Intergroup perceptions, group identifications and self-reported strategies constituted our other dependent measures. Minimal group results, replicated in equal power conditions, were systematically eliminated in unequal power conditions on the matrix measures but not on the intergroup perception measures. Dominant group members were more discriminatory, felt more comfortable and satisfied than subordinate group members. Though consistent with Social Identity Theory (Tajfel and Turner, 1979), results suggest we may also have identified boundary conditions for minimal group discrimination. Without power, social categorization does not lead to effective discrimination.

[1]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour , 1975 .

[2]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Reply to Turner's comments , 1983 .

[3]  John Thibaut,et al.  On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm , 1983 .

[4]  H. Tajfel Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[5]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Minimal group situations and intergroup discrimination: Comments on the paper by Aschenbrenner and schaefer , 1980 .

[6]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism , 1979 .

[7]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive? , 1980 .

[8]  J. Turner A second reply to Bornstein, Crum, Wittenbraker, Harring, Insko and Thibaut on the measurement of social orientations. , 1983 .

[9]  J. Farley Majority-minority relations , 1982 .

[10]  R. Bourhis,et al.  Minimal majorities and minorities , 1984 .

[11]  R. Bourhis,et al.  Vitality Perceptions and Language Attitudes: Some Canadian Data , 1984 .

[12]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour , 1973 .

[13]  S. Ng The Social Psychology of Power , 1981 .

[14]  M. Billig Normative communication in a minimal intergroup situation , 1973 .

[15]  John C. Turner,et al.  Fairness or discrimination in intergroup behaviour? a reply to Branthwaite, Doyle and Lightbown , 1980 .

[16]  M. Brewer In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[17]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social categorization, interpersonal attraction and group formation , 1983 .

[18]  John C. Turner,et al.  Some comments on… ‘the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm’ , 1983 .