Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments

Kinetochores are macromolecular machines that couple chromosomes to dynamic microtubule tips during cell division, thereby generating force to segregate the chromosomes. Accurate segregation depends on selective stabilization of correct ‘bi-oriented’ kinetochore–microtubule attachments, which come under tension as the result of opposing forces exerted by microtubules. Tension is thought to stabilize these bi-oriented attachments indirectly, by suppressing the destabilizing activity of a kinase, Aurora B. However, a complete mechanistic understanding of the role of tension requires reconstitution of kinetochore–microtubule attachments for biochemical and biophysical analyses in vitro. Here we show that native kinetochore particles retaining the majority of kinetochore proteins can be purified from budding yeast and used to reconstitute dynamic microtubule attachments. Individual kinetochore particles maintain load-bearing associations with assembling and disassembling ends of single microtubules for >30 min, providing a close match to the persistent coupling seen in vivo between budding yeast kinetochores and single microtubules. Moreover, tension increases the lifetimes of the reconstituted attachments directly, through a catch bond-like mechanism that does not require Aurora B. On the basis of these findings, we propose that tension selectively stabilizes proper kinetochore–microtubule attachments in vivo through a combination of direct mechanical stabilization and tension-dependent phosphoregulation.

[1]  P. Sorger,et al.  Hierarchical assembly of the budding yeast kinetochore from multiple subcomplexes. , 2003, Genes & development.

[2]  J W Sedat,et al.  Mitosis in living budding yeast: anaphase A but no metaphase plate. , 1997, Science.

[3]  R. Nicklas,et al.  The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[4]  Roger Cooke,et al.  A structural change in the kinesin motor protein that drives motility , 1999, Nature.

[5]  A. Desai,et al.  The Conserved KMN Network Constitutes the Core Microtubule-Binding Site of the Kinetochore , 2006, Cell.

[6]  T. Davis,et al.  Reconstitution and functional analysis of kinetochore subcomplexes. , 2010, Methods in cell biology.

[7]  E. Salmon,et al.  Welcome to a new kind of tension: translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[8]  Bruce F. McEwen,et al.  Contrasting models for kinetochore microtubule attachment in mammalian cells , 2010, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[9]  S. Biggins,et al.  The budding yeast Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase regulates mitotic spindle disassembly , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  Joshua W Shaevitz,et al.  Statistical kinetics of macromolecular dynamics. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Trisha N Davis,et al.  The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Tamir Gonen,et al.  Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[13]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Biophysics of catch bonds. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[14]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.

[15]  S. Biggins,et al.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of purified yeast kinetochores identifies a PP1 regulatory subunit. , 2009, Genes & development.

[16]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Low Force Decelerates L-selectin Dissociation from P-selectin Glycoprotein Ligand-1 and Endoglycan* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Peter K Sorger,et al.  Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  A. Prescott,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules , 2005, Nature.

[19]  Tomoyuki U. Tanaka,et al.  Kinetochore microtubule interaction during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2007, Genes & development.

[20]  G. Fink,et al.  Methods in yeast genetics , 1979 .

[21]  S. Elledge,et al.  The mitotic spindle is required for loading of the DASH complex onto the kinetochore. , 2002, Genes & development.

[22]  D N Mastronarde,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitotic spindle , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  M. Lampson,et al.  Sensing Chromosome Bi-Orientation by Spatial Separation of Aurora B Kinase from Kinetochore Substrates , 2009, Science.

[24]  M. Mann,et al.  Analysis of the Saccharomyces Spindle Pole by Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI) Mass Spectrometry , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  A. Desai,et al.  Molecular architecture of the kinetochore–microtubule interface , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Rolling cell adhesion. , 2010, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[27]  A. Murray,et al.  The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. , 1999, Genes & development.

[28]  E. Salmon,et al.  Molecular architecture of a kinetochore–microtubule attachment site , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[29]  Timothy J. Richmond,et al.  Interactions of Isw2 Chromatin Remodeling Complex with Nucleosomal Arrays: Analyses Using Recombinant Yeast Histones and Immobilized Templates , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[30]  A Khodjakov,et al.  Kinetochores moving away from their associated pole do not exert a significant pushing force on the chromosome , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  Andrew D. Franck,et al.  Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  J. Kilmartin,et al.  Interactions between centromere complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[33]  R. Sikorski,et al.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.

[34]  E. Salmon,et al.  Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[35]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[36]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules , 2003, Nature.

[37]  J. Yates,et al.  A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[38]  S. Biggins,et al.  An Mtw1 complex promotes kinetochore biorientation that is monitored by the Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[39]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Bead movement by single kinesin molecules studied with optical tweezers , 1990, Nature.

[40]  D. Mastronarde,et al.  Fibrils Connect Microtubule Tips with Kinetochores: A Mechanism to Couple Tubulin Dynamics to Chromosome Motion , 2008, Cell.

[41]  R. Nicklas,et al.  Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[42]  A. Hudspeth,et al.  Movement of microtubules by single kinesin molecules , 1989, Nature.

[43]  Andrew D. Franck,et al.  The Ndc80 Kinetochore Complex Forms Load-Bearing Attachments to Dynamic Microtubule Tips via Biased Diffusion , 2009, Cell.

[44]  R. Merkel,et al.  Energy landscapes of receptor–ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy , 1999, Nature.

[45]  A. Musacchio,et al.  The life and miracles of kinetochores , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[46]  Matthias Rief,et al.  Myosin-V is a processive actin-based motor , 1999, Nature.

[47]  D. Drubin,et al.  Dad1p, third component of the Duo1p/Dam1p complex involved in kinetochore function and mitotic spindle integrity. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[48]  Andrew D. Franck,et al.  Direct physical study of kinetochore-microtubule interactions by reconstitution and interrogation with an optical force clamp. , 2010, Methods.