Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments
暂无分享,去创建一个
Tamir Gonen | Sue Biggins | S. Biggins | J. Ranish | T. Gonen | S. Reichow | Christian R. Nelson | Jeffrey A. Ranish | Hugo Arellano-Santoyo | Charles L. Asbury | Bungo Akiyoshi | K. Sarangapani | Steve L. Reichow | C. Asbury | B. Akiyoshi | Krishna K. Sarangapani | Andrew F. Powers | Hugo Arellano-Santoyo | Christian R Nelson
[1] P. Sorger,et al. Hierarchical assembly of the budding yeast kinetochore from multiple subcomplexes. , 2003, Genes & development.
[2] J W Sedat,et al. Mitosis in living budding yeast: anaphase A but no metaphase plate. , 1997, Science.
[3] R. Nicklas,et al. The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.
[4] Roger Cooke,et al. A structural change in the kinesin motor protein that drives motility , 1999, Nature.
[5] A. Desai,et al. The Conserved KMN Network Constitutes the Core Microtubule-Binding Site of the Kinetochore , 2006, Cell.
[6] T. Davis,et al. Reconstitution and functional analysis of kinetochore subcomplexes. , 2010, Methods in cell biology.
[7] E. Salmon,et al. Welcome to a new kind of tension: translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.
[8] Bruce F. McEwen,et al. Contrasting models for kinetochore microtubule attachment in mammalian cells , 2010, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
[9] S. Biggins,et al. The budding yeast Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase regulates mitotic spindle disassembly , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.
[10] Joshua W Shaevitz,et al. Statistical kinetics of macromolecular dynamics. , 2005, Biophysical journal.
[11] Trisha N Davis,et al. The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[12] Tamir Gonen,et al. Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.
[13] Viola Vogel,et al. Biophysics of catch bonds. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.
[14] P. Philippsen,et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.
[15] S. Biggins,et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of purified yeast kinetochores identifies a PP1 regulatory subunit. , 2009, Genes & development.
[16] Cheng Zhu,et al. Low Force Decelerates L-selectin Dissociation from P-selectin Glycoprotein Ligand-1 and Endoglycan* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[17] Peter K Sorger,et al. Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[18] A. Prescott,et al. Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules , 2005, Nature.
[19] Tomoyuki U. Tanaka,et al. Kinetochore microtubule interaction during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2007, Genes & development.
[20] G. Fink,et al. Methods in yeast genetics , 1979 .
[21] S. Elledge,et al. The mitotic spindle is required for loading of the DASH complex onto the kinetochore. , 2002, Genes & development.
[22] D N Mastronarde,et al. Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitotic spindle , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.
[23] M. Lampson,et al. Sensing Chromosome Bi-Orientation by Spatial Separation of Aurora B Kinase from Kinetochore Substrates , 2009, Science.
[24] M. Mann,et al. Analysis of the Saccharomyces Spindle Pole by Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI) Mass Spectrometry , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.
[25] A. Desai,et al. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore–microtubule interface , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[26] Cheng Zhu,et al. Rolling cell adhesion. , 2010, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.
[27] A. Murray,et al. The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. , 1999, Genes & development.
[28] E. Salmon,et al. Molecular architecture of a kinetochore–microtubule attachment site , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.
[29] Timothy J. Richmond,et al. Interactions of Isw2 Chromatin Remodeling Complex with Nucleosomal Arrays: Analyses Using Recombinant Yeast Histones and Immobilized Templates , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[30] A Khodjakov,et al. Kinetochores moving away from their associated pole do not exert a significant pushing force on the chromosome , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.
[31] Andrew D. Franck,et al. Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.
[32] J. Kilmartin,et al. Interactions between centromere complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.
[33] R. Sikorski,et al. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.
[34] E. Salmon,et al. Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. , 1996, Journal of cell science.
[35] G. I. Bell. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.
[36] Cheng Zhu,et al. Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules , 2003, Nature.
[37] J. Yates,et al. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.
[38] S. Biggins,et al. An Mtw1 complex promotes kinetochore biorientation that is monitored by the Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase. , 2003, Developmental cell.
[39] L. Goldstein,et al. Bead movement by single kinesin molecules studied with optical tweezers , 1990, Nature.
[40] D. Mastronarde,et al. Fibrils Connect Microtubule Tips with Kinetochores: A Mechanism to Couple Tubulin Dynamics to Chromosome Motion , 2008, Cell.
[41] R. Nicklas,et al. Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.
[42] A. Hudspeth,et al. Movement of microtubules by single kinesin molecules , 1989, Nature.
[43] Andrew D. Franck,et al. The Ndc80 Kinetochore Complex Forms Load-Bearing Attachments to Dynamic Microtubule Tips via Biased Diffusion , 2009, Cell.
[44] R. Merkel,et al. Energy landscapes of receptor–ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy , 1999, Nature.
[45] A. Musacchio,et al. The life and miracles of kinetochores , 2009, The EMBO journal.
[46] Matthias Rief,et al. Myosin-V is a processive actin-based motor , 1999, Nature.
[47] D. Drubin,et al. Dad1p, third component of the Duo1p/Dam1p complex involved in kinetochore function and mitotic spindle integrity. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.
[48] Andrew D. Franck,et al. Direct physical study of kinetochore-microtubule interactions by reconstitution and interrogation with an optical force clamp. , 2010, Methods.