Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations.

PURPOSE To quantify the rates of recommendation for additional imaging (RAI) in a large number of radiology reports of different modalities and to estimate the effects of 11 clinically relevant factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS This HIPAA compliant research was approved by the institutional review board under an expedited protocol for analyzing anonymous aggregated radiology data. All diagnostic imaging examinations (n = 5 948 342) interpreted by radiologists between 1995 and 2008 were studied. A natural language processing technique specifically designed to extract information about any recommendations from radiology report texts was used. The analytic data set included three quantitative variables: the interpreting radiologist's experience, the year of study, and patient age. Categoric variables described patient location (inpatient, outpatient, emergency department), whether a resident dictated the case, patient sex, modality, body area studied, ordering service, radiologist's specialty division, and whether the examination result was positive. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine the effect of each of these factors on likelihood of RAI while holding all others equal. RESULTS Recommendations increased during the 13 years of study, with the unadjusted rate rising from roughly 6% to 12%. After accounting for all other factors, the odds of any one examination resulting in an RAI increased by 2.16 times (95% confidence interval: 2.12, 2.21) from 1995 to 2008. As radiologist experience increased, the odds of an RAI decreased by about 15% per decade. Studies that had positive findings were more likely (odds ratio = 5.03; 95% confidence interval: 4.98, 5.07) to have an RAI. The remaining factors also had significant effects on the tendency for an RAI. CONCLUSION The likelihood of RAI increased by 15% for each decade of radiologist experience and roughly doubled over 13 years of study.

[1]  D. Aguirre,et al.  Whole-body CT screening: spectrum of findings and recommendations in 1192 patients. , 2005, Radiology.

[2]  S. Goodman Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 1: The P Value Fallacy , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  James H Thrall,et al.  Application of Recently Developed Computer Algorithm for Automatic Classification of Unstructured Radiology Reports: Validation Study 1 , 2004 .

[4]  Pragya A. Dang,et al.  Extraction of recommendation features in radiology with natural language processing: exploratory study. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  A. Saokar,et al.  Does radiologist recommendation for follow-up with the same imaging modality contribute substantially to high-cost imaging volume? , 2007, Radiology.

[6]  R. Varipapa Physicians and outpatient diagnostic imaging: overexposed? , 1993, JAMA.

[7]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Incidental Findings in CT Colonography: Literature Review and Survey of Current Research Practice , 2008, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[8]  Peter Dixon,et al.  The p-value fallacy and how to avoid it. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[9]  D. Levin,et al.  Self-referral in private offices for imaging studies performed in Pennsylvania Blue Shield subscribers during 1991. , 1993, Radiology.

[10]  D. Levin,et al.  Turf wars in radiology: other causes of overutilization and what can be done about it. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[11]  Outcome of examinations self-referred as a result of spiral CT of the abdomen. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[12]  Keith J Dreyer,et al.  Natural language processing using online analytic processing for assessing recommendations in radiology reports. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[13]  Mannudeep K. Kalra,et al.  Use of Radcube for Extraction of Finding Trends in a Large Radiology Practice , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[14]  Daniel I Rosenthal,et al.  Automated computer-assisted categorization of radiology reports. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Frequency of radiology self-referral in abdominal computed tomographic scans and the implied cost. , 2007, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[16]  A. Riddell,et al.  Assessment of acute abdominal pain: utility of a second cross-sectional imaging examination. , 2006, Radiology.