Influence of Agisoft Metashape Parameters on UAS Structure from Motion Individual Tree Detection from Canopy Height Models

Applications of unmanned aerial systems for forest monitoring are increasing and drive a need to understand how image processing workflows impact end-user products’ accuracy from tree detection methods. Increasing image overlap and making acquisitions at lower altitudes improve how structure from motion point clouds represents forest canopies. However, only limited testing has evaluated how image resolution and point cloud filtering impact the detection of individual tree locations and heights. We evaluate how Agisoft Metashape’s build dense cloud Quality (image resolution) and depth map filter settings influence tree detection from canopy height models in ponderosa pine forests. Finer resolution imagery with minimal filtering provided the best visual representation of vegetation detail for trees of all sizes. These same settings maximized tree detection F-score at >0.72 for overstory (>7 m tall) and >0.60 for understory trees. Additionally, overstory tree height bias and precision improve as image resolution becomes finer. Overstory and understory tree detection in open-canopy conifer systems might be optimized using the finest resolution imagery that computer hardware enables, while applying minimal point cloud filtering. The extended processing time and data storage demands of high-resolution imagery must be balanced against small reductions in tree detection performance when down-scaling image resolution to allow the processing of greater data extents.

[1]  Carlos Cabo,et al.  Structure from Motion Photogrammetry in Forestry: a Review , 2019, Current Forestry Reports.

[2]  Chad M. Hoffman,et al.  Spatially explicit measurements of forest structure and fire behavior following restoration treatments in dry forests , 2017 .

[3]  M. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  A Photogrammetric Workflow for the Creation of a Forest Canopy Height Model from Small Unmanned Aerial System Imagery , 2013 .

[4]  Xiaoyan Hu,et al.  A Quantitative Evaluation of Confidence Measures for Stereo Vision , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Marc Olano,et al.  Optimal Altitude, Overlap, and Weather Conditions for Computer Vision UAV Estimates of Forest Structure , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[6]  J. Granneman,et al.  Seeing the trees in the forest: selective electroporation of adipocytes within adipose tissue. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[7]  Satoshi Tsuyuki,et al.  Digital Aerial Photogrammetry for Uneven-Aged Forest Management: Assessing the Potential to Reconstruct Canopy Structure and Estimate Living Biomass , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[8]  P. Gessler,et al.  Automated estimation of individual conifer tree height and crown diameter via two-dimensional spatial wavelet analysis of lidar data , 2006 .

[9]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  LASER-BASED FIELD MEASUREMENTS IN TREE-LEVEL FOREST DATA ACQUISITION , 2009 .

[10]  Jan-Peter Mund,et al.  UAV-Based Photogrammetric Tree Height Measurement for Intensive Forest Monitoring , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[11]  C. Silva,et al.  Imputation of Individual Longleaf Pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) Tree Attributes from Field and LiDAR Data , 2016 .

[12]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Issues in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Data Collection of Complex Forest Environments , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Jerry F Franklin,et al.  Applying LiDAR Individual Tree Detection to Management of Structurally Diverse Forest Landscapes , 2018, Journal of Forestry.

[14]  C. Silva,et al.  Individual tree detection from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) derived canopy height model in an open canopy mixed conifer forest , 2017 .

[15]  Neal C. Swayze,et al.  Influence of flight parameters on UAS-based monitoring of tree height, diameter, and density , 2021 .

[16]  P. Gessler,et al.  Investigating the influence of LiDAR ground surface errors on the utility of derived forest inventories , 2012 .

[17]  Mauricio Galo,et al.  STATISTICAL OUTLIER DETECTION METHOD FOR AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA , 2018, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[18]  Thomas P. Kersten,et al.  INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE QUALITY OF IMAGE-BASED POINT CLOUDS FROM UAV IMAGERY , 2019, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[19]  Zhengqi Li,et al.  MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photos , 2018, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[20]  S. Popescu,et al.  Seeing the Trees in the Forest: Using Lidar and Multispectral Data Fusion with Local Filtering and Variable Window Size for Estimating Tree Height , 2004 .

[21]  Dominic Fawcett,et al.  Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) derived structure-from-motion photogrammetry point clouds for oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) canopy segmentation and height estimation , 2019, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

[22]  J. Vogeler,et al.  Potential for individual tree monitoring in ponderosa pine dominated forests using unmanned aerial system structure from motion point clouds , 2021 .

[23]  Ladislav Kulla,et al.  A Comparison of Two Tree Detection Methods for Estimation of Forest Stand and Ecological Variables from Airborne LiDAR Data in Central European Forests , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[24]  M. Tomé,et al.  Use of multi-temporal UAV-derived imagery for estimating individual tree growth in Pinus pinea stands , 2017 .

[25]  S. Goetz,et al.  UAV‐derived estimates of forest structure to inform ponderosa pine forest restoration , 2019, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation.

[26]  Barbara Koch,et al.  UAV Photogrammetry of Forests as a Vulnerable Process. A Sensitivity Analysis for a Structure from Motion RGB-Image Pipeline , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[27]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – A comparison study of tree height estimates from field measurement, airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning in a boreal forest , 2019, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[28]  Paul Ryan Nesbit,et al.  Enhancing UAV-SfM 3D Model Accuracy in High-Relief Landscapes by Incorporating Oblique Images , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[29]  David Auty,et al.  Airborne LiDAR Data Manipulation and Visualization for Forestry Applications [R package lidR version 3.0.4] , 2020 .

[30]  M. Nilsson Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system , 1996 .

[31]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Development of Height-Volume Relationships in Second Growth Abies grandis for Use with Aerial LiDAR , 2016 .