Understanding the Multidimensionality of Group Development

This article presents a three-dimensional definition space of the group development literature that differentiates group development models on three dimensions: content, population, and path dependency. The multidimensional conceptualization structures and integrates the vast group development literature, enabling direct comparison of competing theories. The utility of this definition space is demonstrated by using the relative positioning of two seemingly competing group development models—the punctuated equilibrium model and the integrative model—to demonstrate their complementarity. The authors also show how organizational researchers and practitioners can use the three-dimensional definition space to select an appropriate theoretical model for the group or group process with which they are working.

[1]  S A Wheelan,et al.  Take teamwork to new heights. , 1999, Nursing management.

[2]  Leif J. Braaten.  Developmental phases of encounter groups and related intensive groups. , 1975 .

[3]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Stability , Bistability , and Instability in Small Group Influence Patterns , 2004 .

[4]  M. S. Poole.  Decision development in small groups: III. A multiple sequence model of group decision development. , 1983 .

[5]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Decision Development in Small Groups IV A Typology of Group Decision Paths , 1989 .

[6]  Julie M. Duck,et al.  Punctuated Equilibrium and Linear Progression: Toward a New Understanding of Group Development , 2003 .

[7]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[8]  A. Montagu.  A Comprehensive Dictionary of Psychological and Psychoanalytical Terms , 1959 .

[9]  Edgar F. Borgatta,et al.  Task and accumulation of experience as factors in the interaction of small groups , 1953 .

[10]  B. E. Wynne,et al.  The Implications of Group Development and History for Group Support System Theory and Practice , 1992 .

[11]  Stephen Worchel,et al.  You Can Go Home Again , 1994 .

[12]  John M. Levine,et al.  Group dynamics over time: Development and socialization in small groups. , 1988 .

[13]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  The Life Cycle of Groups: Group Developmental Stage Theory , 1981 .

[14]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Decision Development in Small Groups V: Test of a Contingency Model. , 1989 .

[16]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[17]  Sheryl F. Kline,et al.  Member Perceptions of Internal Group Dynamics and Productivity , 1998 .

[18]  S. Wheelan.  Group Processes: A Developmental Perspective , 1993 .

[19]  S. Wheelan,et al.  Facilitating Work Team Effectiveness , 1999 .

[20]  Sequential Stages of Development in Sensitivity Training Groups , 1978 .

[21]  F. Atelsek,et al.  Firo: A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior , 1959 .

[22]  T. Mills.  Group transformation : an analysis of a learning group , 1965 .

[23]  Anson Seers,et al.  Temporal Pacing in Task Forces: Group Development or Deadline Pressure? , 1997 .

[24]  A. Paul Hare,et al.  Theories of Group Development and Categories for Interaction Analysis , 1973 .

[25]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Social Evolution and the Emergence of Leadership. , 1980 .

[26]  Kenneth N. Cissna.  Phases in Group Development , 1984 .

[27]  W. Bion,et al.  Experiences in groups. , 1961, Human relations; studies towards the integration of the social sciences.

[28]  R. Bales,et al.  Phases in group problem-solving. , 1951, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[29]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Group Decision Support Systems on Group Development , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[31]  Edward A. Mabry,et al.  EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF A DEVELOPMENTAL MODEL FOR TASK‐ORIENTED SMALL GROUPS , 1975 .

[32]  C. Gersick.  MARKING TIME: PREDICTABLE TRANSITIONS IN TASK GROUPS , 1989 .

[33]  Leroy Gruner,et al.  A Study of Development in Open and Closed Groups , 1973 .

[34]  R. Katz.  The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. , 1982 .

[35]  Philip E. Slater,et al.  Microcosm: Structural, Psychological and Religious Evolution in Groups. , 1967 .

[36]  B. Tuckman,et al.  Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited , 1977 .

[37]  Dexter Dunphy,et al.  Phases, Roles, and Myths in Self-Analytic Groups , 1968 .

[38]  John Thibaut,et al.  Trade versus expropriation in open groups: A comparison of two types of social power. , 1983 .

[39]  W. Bennis,et al.  A Theory of Group Development , 1956 .

[40]  Christoph M. Heinicke,et al.  Developmental Trends in the Structure of Small Groups , 1953 .

[41]  S. Wheelan,et al.  The Relationship between Faculty Group Development and School Productivity , 1999 .

[42]  S. Obert.  Developmental Patterns of Organizational Task Groups: A Preliminary Study , 1983 .

[43]  Kenneth L. Bettenhausen.  Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed , 1991 .

[44]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences in decision making 1 , 1983 .