A new approach for modeling generalization gradients: a case for hierarchical models

A case is made for the use of hierarchical models in the analysis of generalization gradients. Hierarchical models overcome several restrictions that are imposed by repeated measures analysis-of-variance (rANOVA), the default statistical method in current generalization research. More specifically, hierarchical models allow to include continuous independent variables and overcomes problematic assumptions such as sphericity. We focus on how generalization research can benefit from this added flexibility. In a simulation study we demonstrate the dominance of hierarchical models over rANOVA. In addition, we show the lack of efficiency of the Mauchly's sphericity test in sample sizes typical for generalization research, and confirm how violations of sphericity increase the probability of type I errors. A worked example of a hierarchical model is provided, with a specific emphasis on the interpretation of parameters relevant for generalization research.

[1]  Vishnu P. Murty,et al.  Neurobehavioral mechanisms of human fear generalization , 2011, NeuroImage.

[2]  C. Grillon,et al.  Overgeneralization of conditioned fear as a pathogenic marker of panic disorder. , 2010, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  F B Baker,et al.  Estimates of test size for several test procedures based on conventional variance ratios in the repeated measures design , 1967, Psychometrika.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  K. Williams,et al.  Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[7]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[8]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. , 1993 .

[9]  H. Huynh,et al.  Estimation of the Box Correction for Degrees of Freedom from Sample Data in Randomized Block and Split-Plot Designs , 1976 .

[10]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Ana Ivelisse Avilés,et al.  Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001, Technometrics.

[12]  H. Huynh,et al.  Conditions under Which Mean Square Ratios in Repeated Measurements Designs Have Exact F-Distributions , 1970 .

[13]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Marcel A. van den Hout,et al.  Neuroticism and avoidance of ambiguous stimuli: Better safe than sorry? , 2010 .

[15]  Bram Vervliet,et al.  Fear Generalization in Humans: Systematic Review and Implications for Anxiety Disorder Research. , 2015, Behavior therapy.

[16]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[17]  J P Hatch,et al.  A test for serial correlation in univariate repeated-measures analysis. , 1983, Biometrics.

[18]  M. Masson,et al.  A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming , 2010 .

[19]  G. Verbeke,et al.  Statistical inference in generalized linear mixed models: a review. , 2006, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[20]  Austin F. Frank,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2010 .

[21]  H. L. Hollingworth,et al.  What Is Learning , 1932 .

[22]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[23]  Ellen R. Girden,et al.  ANOVA: Repeated Measures , 1991 .

[24]  Clifton B. Chadwick What is learning , 2002 .

[25]  J. Mauchly Significance Test for Sphericity of a Normal $n$-Variate Distribution , 1940 .

[26]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[27]  J. de Houwer,et al.  What is learning? On the nature and merits of a functional definition of learning , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[28]  Daniel S Pine,et al.  Generalization of conditioned fear-potentiated startle in humans: experimental validation and clinical relevance. , 2008, Behaviour research and therapy.

[29]  N. Guttman,et al.  Discriminability and stimulus generalization. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[31]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.

[32]  Bram Vervliet,et al.  Generalization of conditioned responding: effects of autobiographical memory specificity. , 2012, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[33]  G. Box Some Theorems on Quadratic Forms Applied in the Study of Analysis of Variance Problems, I. Effect of Inequality of Variance in the One-Way Classification , 1954 .

[34]  Bram Vervliet,et al.  Generalization gradients for acquisition and extinction in human contingency learning. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[35]  Menggang Yu,et al.  Bias and efficiency loss due to categorizing an explanatory variable , 2002 .

[36]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[37]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[38]  M K Kaiser,et al.  MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .