Validation of an online replanning technique for prostate adaptive radiotherapy.

We have previously developed an online adaptive replanning technique to rapidly adapt the original plan according to daily CT. This paper reports the quality assurance (QA) developments in its clinical implementation for prostate cancer patients. A series of pre-clinical validation tests were carried out to verify the overall accuracy and consistency of the online replanning procedure. These tests include (a) phantom measurements of 22 individual patient adaptive plans to verify their accuracy and deliverability and (b) efficiency and applicability of the online replanning process. A four-step QA procedure was established to ensure the safe and accurate delivery of an adaptive plan, including (1) offline phantom measurement of the original plan, (2) online independent monitor unit (MU) calculation for a redundancy check, (3) online verification of plan-data transfer using an in-house software and (4) offline validation of actually delivered beam parameters. The pre-clinical validations demonstrate that the newly implemented online replanning technique is dosimetrically accurate and practically efficient. The four-step QA procedure is capable of identifying possible errors in the process of online adaptive radiotherapy and to ensure the safe and accurate delivery of the adaptive plans. Based on the success of this work, the online replanning technique has been used in the clinic to correct for interfractional changes during the prostate radiation therapy.

[1]  Raj Shekhar,et al.  Direct aperture deformation: an interfraction image guidance strategy. , 2006, Medical physics.

[2]  Yoshihiro Takai,et al.  Evaluation of inter- and intrafraction organ motion during intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer measured by a newly developed on-board image-guided system. , 2005, Radiation medicine.

[3]  Ergun E Ahunbay,et al.  Online adaptive replanning method for prostate radiotherapy. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  He Wang,et al.  An automatic CT-guided adaptive radiation therapy technique by online modification of multileaf collimator leaf positions for prostate cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Ergun E Ahunbay,et al.  An on-line replanning method for head and neck adaptive radiotherapya). , 2009, Medical physics.

[6]  T. Byrne,et al.  A review of prostate motion with considerations for the treatment of prostate cancer. , 2005, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[7]  He Wang,et al.  Use of deformed intensity distributions for on-line modification of image-guided IMRT to account for interfractional anatomic changes. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  J J W Lagendijk,et al.  Variation in target and rectum dose due to prostate deformation: an assessment by repeated MR imaging and treatment planning , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Ergun Ahunbay,et al.  SU‐GG‐T‐20: GPU‐Accelerated Auto‐Segmentation for Online Adaptive Radiotherapy , 2010 .

[12]  Qiuwen Wu,et al.  Geometric and dosimetric evaluations of an online image-guidance strategy for 3D-CRT of prostate cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Sreeram Narayanan,et al.  An on-line replanning scheme for interfractional variationsa). , 2008, Medical physics.

[14]  J A Antolak,et al.  Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  P Kijewski,et al.  Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion: implications for treatment planning. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  S. Schild,et al.  Movements of the prostate due to rectal and bladder distension: implications for radiotherapy. , 1993, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[17]  Lei Dong,et al.  Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  D. Yan,et al.  Computed tomography guided management of interfractional patient variation. , 2005, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[19]  Lei Dong,et al.  Intrafraction prostate motion during IMRT for prostate cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Shu Liao,et al.  Learning statistical correlation for fast prostate registration in image-guided radiotherapy. , 2011, Medical physics.

[21]  Luca Incrocci,et al.  Deformation of prostate and seminal vesicles relative to intraprostatic fiducial markers. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  K. Brock,et al.  A magnetic resonance imaging study of prostate deformation relative to implanted gold fiducial markers. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  X. Li,et al.  A comparison of daily megavoltage CT and ultrasound image guided radiation therapy for prostate cancer. , 2008, Medical physics.