Inclusive social norms and nationals’ positive intergroup orientations toward refugees: The moderating role of initial prejudice and intergroup contact

Research on the interplay between inclusive norms and intergroup contact on improving intergroup orientations has yielded conflicting results, suggesting either that an experience of personal contact is necessary to have a positive effect of inclusive norms or that such personal experience is not always necessary. To clarify this issue, across four studies ( N = 835), we investigated the influence of inclusive norms on positive intergroup orientations as a function of personal experiences of intergroup contact. Study 1 demonstrated that inclusive norms are more strongly correlated with experiences of personal contact with outgroups with whom opportunities of contact are more (i.e., immigrants) than less (i.e., refugees) frequent. Study 2 provided experimental evidence for this finding showing that inclusive norms increase prejudiced nationals’ willingness to engage in future contact with immigrants but not with refugees, suggesting that conformity to inclusive norms depends on varying contact opportunities with the outgroups. Studies 3 and 4 confirmed that prejudiced nationals conformed to inclusive norms specifically when experienced positive contact with a refugee (experimentally induced with the imagined contact paradigm), compared with no contact (Study 3) or negative contact (Study 4). We discuss the implications of these findings for research on intergroup contact, social influence, and intergroup relations.

[1]  A. Minescu,et al.  A test of the maintenance of the effects of imagined contact framed with supportive social norms as a teacher-led field intervention. , 2022, Journal of school psychology.

[2]  E. Green,et al.  Policies and prejudice: Integration policies moderate the link between immigrant presence and anti-immigrant prejudice. , 2022, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[3]  E. Green,et al.  Past and Present Intergroup Contact and Conflict Among Inhabitants of Former Mixed Villages of Cyprus: The Role of Individual and Collective Experiences in Predicting Attitudes and Trust , 2021, Political Psychology.

[4]  L. Andrighetto,et al.  Ingroup norms shape understanding of outgroup prosocial behaviors , 2021, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.

[5]  O. Christ,et al.  How do we get people into contact? Predictors of intergroup contact and drivers of contact seeking , 2020, Journal of Social Issues.

[6]  F. White,et al.  Beyond direct contact: The theoretical and societal relevance of indirect contact for improving intergroup relations , 2020 .

[7]  S. Shaw,et al.  Safety Among Newly Resettled Refugees in the USA , 2020, Journal of International Migration and Integration.

[8]  N. Bowling,et al.  The Effects of Questionnaire Length and Behavioral Consequences on Careless Responding , 2020 .

[9]  E. Green,et al.  Consensual Versus Heterogeneous Conceptions of Nationhood: The Role of Citizenship Regimes and Integration Policies Across 21 European Countries , 2020, Social Indicators Research.

[10]  E. Green,et al.  Intergroup contact moderates the influence of social norms on prejudice , 2020, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.

[11]  Maria Ioannou The week after: Do the effects of imagined contact last over time? , 2019, Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

[12]  Martin J. Blank “Wir Schaffen Das!”? Spatial Pitfalls of Neighborhood-Based Refugee Reception in Germany—A Case Study of Frankfurt-Rödelheim , 2019, Social Sciences.

[13]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Seeking and avoiding intergroup contact: Future frontiers of research on building social integration , 2018, Social and Personality Psychology Compass.

[14]  W. Van den Noortgate,et al.  Equality Revisited: A Cultural Meta-Analysis of Intergroup Contact and Prejudice , 2018 .

[15]  E. Green,et al.  Inclusive Normative Climates Strengthen the Relationship Between Identification With Europe and Tolerant Immigration Attitudes: Evidence From 22 Countries , 2018, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.

[16]  S. Slama De la défaillance systémique à la « policiarisation » des conditions d’accueil des demandeurs d’asile en France , 2018, Revue des droits de l'homme.

[17]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Depersonalized extended contact and injunctive norms about cross-group friendship impact intergroup orientations , 2018 .

[18]  P. Liamputtong,et al.  Health, social integration and social support: The lived experiences of young Middle-Eastern refugees living in Melbourne, Australia , 2018 .

[19]  Jasper Van Assche,et al.  The mobilizing effect of right-wing ideological climates : cross-level interaction effects on different types of outgroup attitudes , 2017 .

[20]  Charles R. Seger,et al.  Imagined contact encourages prosocial behavior towards outgroup members , 2017 .

[21]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions , 2017 .

[22]  Mark Rubin,et al.  Effects of Past and Present Intergroup Communication on Perceived Fit of an Outgroup Member and Desire for Future Intergroup Contact , 2017, Communication Research.

[23]  Chantelle Wood,et al.  Imagined contact can be more effective for participants with stronger initial prejudices , 2017 .

[24]  Danielle Gaucher,et al.  The Global Refugee Crisis: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications for Improving Public Attitudes and Facilitating Refugee Resettlement , 2017 .

[25]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Testing a contact intervention based on intergroup friendship between Roma and non-Roma Hungarians: reducing bias through institutional support in a non-supportive societal context , 2017 .

[26]  Zhuang Fengqing,et al.  Patients’ Responsibilities in Medical Ethics , 2016 .

[27]  E. Page‐Gould,et al.  How Can Intergroup Interaction Be Bad If Intergroup Contact Is Good? Exploring and Reconciling an Apparent Paradox in the Science of Intergroup Relations , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[28]  B. Choma,et al.  Can (elaborated) imagined contact interventions reduce prejudice among those higher in intergroup disgust sensitivity (ITG‐DS)? , 2015 .

[29]  Gordon Hodson,et al.  The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity , 2015 .

[30]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present , 2014 .

[31]  Nick Joyce,et al.  Improving Intergroup Attitudes through Televised Vicarious Intergroup Contact , 2014, Commun. Res..

[32]  James Laurence Reconciling the contact and threat hypotheses: does ethnic diversity strengthen or weaken community inter-ethnic relations? , 2014 .

[33]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  How Peer Norms of Inclusion and Exclusion Predict Children's Interest in Cross‐Ethnic Friendships , 2014 .

[34]  R. Crisp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis , 2014 .

[35]  U. Wagner,et al.  Unwilling, but not unaffected—Imagined contact effects for authoritarians and social dominators , 2013 .

[36]  G. Mugny,et al.  Conformity and counter‐conformity to anti‐discrimination norms: the moderating effect of attitude toward foreigners and perceived in‐group threat , 2013 .

[37]  Rhiannon N. Turner,et al.  Out-group trust, intergroup anxiety, and out-group attitude as mediators of the effect of imagined intergroup contact on intergroup behavioral tendencies , 2013 .

[38]  C. Kobelinsky « Il n’y a que l’expulsion à l’horizon » : Le dilemme des travailleurs sociaux des centres d’accueil pour demandeurs d’asile en France , 2012 .

[39]  C. Sibley,et al.  The Contact Caveat , 2012, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[40]  R. Crisp,et al.  Imagining Intergroup Contact Can Combat Mental Health Stigma by Reducing Anxiety, Avoidance and Negative Stereotyping , 2012, The Journal of social psychology.

[41]  D. Capozza,et al.  Increasing outgroup trust, reducing infrahumanization, and enhancing future contact intentions via imagined intergroup contact. , 2012 .

[42]  M. Hogg,et al.  Imagining intergroup contact enables member-to-group generalization. , 2011 .

[43]  K. Liebkind,et al.  The Impact of Perceived Social Norms, Gender, and Intergroup Anxiety on the Relationship Between Intergroup Contact and Ethnic Attitudes of Adolescents1 , 2011 .

[44]  A. Rutland,et al.  Friendship preferences among German and Turkish preadolescents. , 2011, Child development.

[45]  Chad R. Mortensen,et al.  Bodies obliged and unbound: differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  Richard J. Crisp,et al.  Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect , 2010 .

[47]  Luigi Salmaso,et al.  Permutation Tests for Complex Data , 2010 .

[48]  R. Crisp,et al.  Imagined Intergroup Contact: A New Technique for Encouraging Greater Inter-Ethnic Contact in Cyprus , 2010 .

[49]  G. Mugny,et al.  Group motives in threatening contexts: When a loyalty conflict paradoxically reduces the influence of an anti‐discrimination ingroup norm , 2009 .

[50]  Rhiannon N. Turner,et al.  Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[51]  A. Hiel,et al.  We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians , 2009 .

[52]  Rhiannon N. Turner,et al.  Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship , 2007 .

[53]  C. Stangor,et al.  When are intergroup attitudes based on perceived consensus information? , 2007 .

[54]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  K. Durkin,et al.  Group norms, threat, and children's racial prejudice. , 2005, Child development.

[56]  Gary H. McClelland,et al.  L'utilisation des contrastes dans l'analyse des données : Comment tester les hypothèses spécifiques dans la recherche en psychologie ? , 2005 .

[57]  G. Mugny,et al.  Perceived in-group threat as a factor moderating the influence of in-group norms on discrimination against foreigners , 2004 .

[58]  C. Crandall,et al.  A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[59]  P W Corrigan,et al.  Prejudice, social distance, and familiarity with mental illness. , 2001, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[60]  M. J. Monteith,et al.  The Effect of Social Norm Activation on the Expression of Opinions Concerning Gay Men and Blacks , 1996 .

[61]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  The transsituational influence of social norms. , 1993 .

[62]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. , 1990 .