Linguistic Assessment Approach for Hierarchical Safety Analysis and Synthesis

Engineering systems in industry are most often concerned with safety issues. Many of these systems are intended to work properly even in contexts where information is missing, incomplete or unreliable. This chapter introduces a safety model based on the concept of approximate reasoning for safety analysis. Parameters of the safety level, including failure rate, failure consequence severity and failure consequence probability, are all described by fuzzy linguistic variables. A fuzzy rule-base is used to capture the uncertainty and the non-linear relationships among these parameters. A safety estimate for possible causes of a technical failure can be obtained by the approximate reasoning approach. A safety synthesis is then applied to integrate all possible causes for a specific technical failure, or applied at the safety estimate made by a panel of experts. The synthesis is based on an ordinal fuzzy linguistic approach by means of a direct computation on linguistic values instead of the approximation approach by their associated membership functions. The use of the ordinal fuzzy linguistic approach makes the safety analysis more effective. Subsequently, the ranking and interpretation of the final safety synthesis of a concerned system are also described. Application of this proposed approach is demonstrated by a realworld case study in the offshore engineering. ________________________________________________________________

[1]  L. A. ZADEH,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - I , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Multi-person and multi-attribute design evaluations using evidential reasoning based on subjective safety and cost analyses , 1996 .

[3]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[4]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[5]  José L. Verdegay,et al.  On aggregation operations of linguistic labels , 1993, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[6]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[7]  Kurt J. Schmucker,et al.  Fuzzy Sets, Natural Language Computations, and Risk Analysis , 1983 .

[8]  J. B. Bowles,et al.  Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis , 1995 .

[9]  Adedeji B. Badiru,et al.  Fuzzy modeling and analytic hierarchy processing to quantify risk levels associated with occupational injuries. I. The development of fuzzy-linguistic risk levels , 1996, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[10]  R. Yager Concepts, Theory, and Techniques A NEW METHODOLOGY FOR ORDINAL MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISIONS BASED ON FUZZY SETS , 1981 .

[11]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Aggregation operators for linguistic weighted information , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[12]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Review of Uncertainty Reasoning Approaches as Guidance for Maritime and Offshore Safety-Based Assessment , 2002 .

[13]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  An approach to ordinal decision making , 1995, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[14]  D E Pickbourne Design for safety. , 1967, Chemistry & industry.

[15]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Potential applications of fuzzy sets in industrial safety engineering , 1986 .

[16]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Collision Risk Analysis of FPSO-Tanker Offloading Operation , 2002 .

[17]  Jin Wang,et al.  A subjective methodology for safety analysis of safety requirements specifications , 1997, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..