COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SHOE-SURFACE INTERACTION IN TRAIL RUNNING - SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE EVALUATION

The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate different running shoes in various surface conditions in two measurement phases. In the subjective test, fourteen trail runners performed the experiment with three running shoes in distinct surface conditions. Three features, comfort, cushioning and traction, were rated by means of questionnaire. In the objective measurement, a traction tester device was configured to simulate the movement and evaluate the rotational traction of the three shoes on different surfaces. The subjective test showed a significant difference with respect to comfort and cushioning. The objective measurement in dry conditions showed a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in rotational traction on different surface types; rotational traction in wet conditions was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in dry conditions.

[1]  P. Tsaklis,et al.  Prevalence of Injury in Ultra Trail Running , 2015 .

[2]  R. W. Higgins,et al.  Football Cleat Design and Its Effect on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  The influence of soccer cleat design on resultant joint moments , 2010 .

[4]  Jiri Dvorak,et al.  Risk Factor Analysis for Injuries in Football Players , 2000, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  D. Bramble,et al.  Endurance running and the evolution of Homo , 2004, Nature.

[6]  V. Senner,et al.  Development of a test device for testing soccer boots under gamerelevant highrisk loading conditions , 2007 .

[7]  J. Hamill,et al.  Kinetic asymmetry in female runners with and without retrospective tibial stress fractures. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  S Orava,et al.  Risk Factors for Recurrent Stress Fractures in Athletes , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  Ewald M Hennig,et al.  The Influence of Soccer Shoe Design on Player Performance and Injuries , 2011, Research in sports medicine.

[10]  Sharon J Dixon,et al.  External frontal plane loads may be associated with tibial stress fracture. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  Maria W. G. Nijhuis-van der Sanden,et al.  Injuries in Runners; A Systematic Review on Risk Factors and Sex Differences , 2015, PloS one.

[12]  B. Nigg,et al.  Relationship between plantar pressure distribution under the foot and insole comfort. , 1994, Clinical biomechanics.