Immersion lithography at 193nm has emerged as the leading contender for critical patterning through the 32nm technology node. Super-high NA, along with attendant polarization effects, will require re-optimization of virtually every resolution enhancement technology and the implementation of advanced process control at intra-wafer and intra-field levels. Furthermore, interactions of critical dimensions, profiles, roughness, and overlay between layers will impact design margins and become severe yield limiters. In this work, we show how design margins are reduced as a result of hidden process error and how this error can be parsed into unobservable, unsampled, unmodeled, and uncorrectable components. We apply four new process control technologies that use spectroscopic ellipsometry, grating-based overlay metrology, e-beam array imaging, and simulation to reduce hidden systematic error. Feedback of super-accurate process metrics will be critical to the application of conjoint DFM and APC strategies at the 65nm node and beyond. Manufacturing economics will force a trade-off between measurement cost and yield loss that favors greater expenditure on process control.
[1]
Kevin M. Monahan.
Microeconomics of process control in semiconductor manufacturing
,
2003,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[2]
Yunfei Deng,et al.
Inspection of integrated circuit databases through reticle and wafer simulation: an integrated approach to design for manufacturing (DFM)
,
2005,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[3]
Philippe Thony,et al.
Overlay measurement accuracy verification using CD-SEM and application to the quantification of WIS caused by BARC
,
2005,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[4]
Hedong Yang,et al.
Automated CD SEM tilt-ready for primetime: a fast in-line methodology for differentiating lines vs. spaces
,
2005,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[5]
Benjamin Szu-Min Lin,et al.
Feasibility of improving CD-SEM-based APC system for exposure tool by spectroscopic-ellipsometry-based APC system
,
2005,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.