CT and MRI compatibility of flexible 3D printed materials for soft actuators and robots used in image-guided interventions.

PURPOSE 3D printing allows for the fabrication of medical devices with complex geometries, such as soft actuators and robots that can be used in image-guided interventions. This study investigates flexible and rigid 3D printing materials in terms of their impact on multimodal medical imaging. METHODS The generation of artifacts in clinical CT and MR imaging was evaluated for six flexible and three rigid materials, each with a cubical and a cylindrical geometry, and for one exemplary flexible fluidic actuator. Additionally, CT Hounsfield units (HU) were quantified for various parameter sets iterating peak voltage, X-ray tube current, slice thickness and convolution kernel. RESULTS We found the image artifacts caused by the materials to be negligible in both CT and MR images. The HU values mainly depended on the elemental composition of the materials and applied peak voltage ranging between 80 kVp to 140 kVp. Flexible, non-silicone-based materials ranged between 51 HU and 114 HU. The voltage dependency was less than 29 HU. Flexible, silicone-based materials ranged between 60 HU and 365 HU. The voltage-dependent influence was as large as 172 HU. Rigid materials ranged between -69 HU and 132 HU. The voltage-dependent influence was less than 33 HU. CONCLUSION All tested materials may be employed for devices placed in the field of view during CT and MR imaging as no significant artifacts were measured. Moreover, the material selection in CT could be based on the desired visibility of the material depending on the application. Given the wide availability of the tested materials, we expect our results to have a positive impact on the development of devices and robots for image-guided interventions.

[1]  Ken Masamune,et al.  Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging–conditional robotic devices for therapy and diagnosis , 2014, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[2]  S. Srinivas,et al.  Prognostic Value of Quantitative Metabolic Metrics on Baseline Pre-Sunitinib FDG PET/CT in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2016, PloS one.

[3]  M. V. van Leeuwen,et al.  Minimizing clip artifacts in multi CT angiography of clipped patients. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  David Manton,et al.  Development of multi-purpose 3D printed phantoms for MRI , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  A rolling-diaphragm hydrostatic transmission for remote MR-guided needle insertion , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[6]  Sunghwan Lim,et al.  Robotically Assisted Long Bone Biopsy Under MRI Imaging: Workflow and Preclinical Study. , 2018, Academic radiology.

[7]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Artifacts in 3-T MRI: physical background and reduction strategies. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[8]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Is TrueFISP a gradient‐echo or a spin‐echo sequence? , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Peter Balter,et al.  Material matters: Analysis of density uncertainty in 3D printing and its consequences for radiation oncology , 2018, Medical physics.

[10]  Sarthak Misra,et al.  Introducing PneuAct: Parametrically-Designed MRI-Compatible Pneumatic Stepper Actuator , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[11]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  MR Compatibility of Mechatronic Devices: Design Criteria , 1999, MICCAI.

[12]  Hao Su,et al.  Robotic System for MRI-Guided Stereotactic Neurosurgery , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Matt A Bernstein,et al.  Imaging artifacts at 3.0T , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Constantinos Mavroidis,et al.  Magnetic resonance-compatible robotic and mechatronics systems for image-guided interventions and rehabilitation: a review study. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[15]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Buckling of Elastomeric Beams Enables Actuation of Soft Machines , 2015, Advanced materials.

[16]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  MR Safe Robot, FDA Clearance, Safety and Feasibility of Prostate Biopsy Clinical Trial , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[17]  Sebastian Bickelhaupt,et al.  Adiabatically prepared spin‐lock approach for T1ρ‐based dynamic glucose enhanced MRI at ultrahigh fields , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Michael Tapner,et al.  Abdo-Man: a 3D-printed anthropomorphic phantom for validating quantitative SIRT , 2016, EJNMMI Physics.

[20]  Riccardo Secoli,et al.  A low-cost, high-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging–compatible actuator , 2015, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[21]  Nazir Kamaldin,et al.  A Magnetic Resonance Compatible Soft Wearable Robotic Glove for Hand Rehabilitation and Brain Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  Fritz Schick,et al.  RF artifacts caused by metallic implants or instruments which get more prominent at 3 T: an in vitro study. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  Richard J. Bibb,et al.  Computed tomography characterisation of additive manufacturing materials. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  Mahmood Karimi,et al.  3D printed soft actuators for a legged robot capable of navigating unstructured terrain , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[25]  Charalampos Tsoumpas,et al.  Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound , 2018, Medical physics.

[26]  Daniel Güllmar,et al.  3D printing of MRI compatible components: why every MRI research group should have a low-budget 3D printer. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[27]  D. Vuitton,et al.  Alveolar echinococcosis: correlation between hepatic MRI findings and FDG-PET/CT metabolic activity , 2014, Abdominal Imaging.

[28]  P. Bendel,et al.  An analysis of fast imaging sequences with steady‐state transverse magnetization refocusing , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Reduction of susceptibility artifact in gradient‐echo imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  A. Patriciu,et al.  A New Type of Motor: Pneumatic Step Motor , 2007, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[31]  Thomas J. Wallin,et al.  3D printing antagonistic systems of artificial muscle using projection stereolithography , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[32]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Pneumatic Networks for Soft Robotics that Actuate Rapidly , 2014 .

[33]  A E Gross,et al.  Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience. , 2000, Radiology.

[34]  Nobuhiko Hata,et al.  Robotics in MRI-Guided Interventions , 2018, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[35]  S B Crowe,et al.  Radiological properties of 3D printed materials in kilovoltage and megavoltage photon beams. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[36]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Imaging of Patients with Complex Hemodialysis Arterio-Venous Fistulas using Time-Resolved Dynamic CT Angiography: Comparison with Duplex Ultrasound , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[37]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  MR liver imaging and cholangiography in the presence of surgical metallic clips at 1.5 and 3 Tesla , 2006, European Radiology.

[39]  Stephan E Maier,et al.  Three‐dimensional printing of MRI‐visible phantoms and MR image‐guided therapy simulation , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Analysis of multiple‐acquisition SSFP , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[41]  B. Wexler,et al.  Brain Activity During Cocaine Craving and Gambling Urges: An fMRI Study , 2016, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[42]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  MRI-guided robotic system for transperineal prostate interventions: proof of principle , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  Arno Buecker,et al.  Glass-Fiber-based MR-safe Guidewire for MR Imaging-guided Endovascular Interventions: In Vitro and Preclinical in Vivo Feasibility Study. , 2017, Radiology.

[44]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[45]  George Shih,et al.  Imaging Properties of 3D Printed Materials: Multi-Energy CT of Filament Polymers , 2017, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[46]  L. Schad,et al.  Quantitative arterial spin labelling perfusion measurements in rat models of renal transplantation and acute kidney injury at 3T. , 2017, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[47]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Buckling Pneumatic Linear Actuators Inspired by Muscle , 2016 .

[48]  M. Kuroda,et al.  Composition of MRI phantom equivalent to human tissues. , 2005, Medical physics.