A Kalman filter approach to track fast impedance changes in electrical impedance tomography

In electrical impedance tomography (EIT), an estimate for the cross-sectional impedance distribution is obtained from the body by using current and voltage measurements made from the boundary. All well-known reconstruction algorithms use a full set of independent current patterns for each reconstruction. In some applications, the impedance changes may be so fast that information on the time evolution of the impedance distribution is either lost or severely blurred. Here, the authors propose an algorithm for EIT reconstruction that is able to track fast changes in the impedance distribution. The method is based on the formulation of EIT as a state-estimation problem and the recursive estimation of the state with the aid of the Kalman filter. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated with a simulation of human thorax in a situation in which the impedances of the ventricles change rapidly. The authors show that with optimal current patterns and proper parameterization, the proposed approach yields significant enhancement of the temporal resolution over the conventional reconstruction strategy.

[1]  David Isaacson,et al.  NOSER: An algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem , 1990, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[2]  B. Brown,et al.  Applied potential tomography. , 1989, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society.

[3]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  Improved methods to determine optimal currents in electrical impedance tomography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  B. Anderson,et al.  Optimal Filtering , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  Jan Strackee,et al.  The Physics of heart and circulation , 1993 .

[6]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  Time Series: Theory and Methods , 2013 .

[7]  D. Isaacson Distinguishability of Conductivities by Electric Current Computed Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Han-Fu Chen,et al.  Identification and Stochastic Adaptive Control , 1991 .

[9]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Tikhonov regularization and prior information in electrical impedance tomography , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  D. Isaacson,et al.  Electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  B. M. Eyuboglu,et al.  In vivo imaging of cardiac related impedance changes , 1989, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[12]  B. Brown,et al.  Applied potential tomography: possible clinical applications. , 1985, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[13]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  Comparing Reconstruction Algorithms for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  B H Brown,et al.  Limitations in hardware design in impedance imaging. , 1987, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[15]  M. Cheney,et al.  Distinguishability in impedance imaging , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  John G. Webster,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1991 .

[17]  T. Kailath,et al.  New square-root smoothing algorithms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[18]  J. Wilmore,et al.  Physiology of Sport and Exercise , 1995 .

[19]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1992 .

[20]  Pierre Priouret,et al.  Adaptive Algorithms and Stochastic Approximations , 1990, Applications of Mathematics.

[21]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Square-root Bryson-Frazier smoothing algorithms , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..