Software defined networking for resilient communications in Smart Grid active distribution networks

Emerging Software Defined Networking (SDN) technology provides excellent flexibility to large-scale networks in terms of control, management, security, and maintenance. In this paper, we propose an SDN-based communication infrastructure for Smart Grid distribution networks among substations. A Smart Grid communication infrastructure consists of a large number of heterogenous devices that exchange real-time information for monitoring the status of the grid. We then investigate how SDN-enabled Smart Grid infrastructure can provide resilience to active distribution substations with self-recovery. Specifically, by introducing redundant and wireless communication links that can be used during the emergencies, we show that SDN controllers can be effective for restoring the communication while providing a lot of flexibility. Furthermore, to be able to effectively evaluate the performance of the proposed work in terms of various fine-grained network metrics, we developed a Mininet-based testing framework and integrated it with ns-3 network simulator. Finally, we conducted experiments by using actual Smart Grid communication data to assess the recovery performance of the proposed SDN-based system. The results show that SDN is a viable technology for the Smart Grid communications with almost negligible delays in switching to backup wireless links during the times of link failures in reliable fashion.

[1]  Brian Ray Miller Concept for Next Generation Phasor Measurement: A Low-Cost, Self-Contained, and Wireless Design , 2010 .

[2]  Kenneth C. Budka,et al.  Communication network architecture and design principles for smart grids , 2010, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[3]  Qi Hao,et al.  A Survey on Software-Defined Network and OpenFlow: From Concept to Implementation , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  Saurabh Kumar,et al.  Efficient PMU networking with software defined networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[5]  Eric Keller,et al.  Software-defined energy communication networks: From substation automation to future smart grids , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[6]  Christian Wietfeld,et al.  Software-defined networking for Smart Grid communications: Applications, challenges and advantages , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[7]  James J. Nutaro,et al.  Simulative Comparison of Multiprotocol Label Switching and OpenFlow Network Technologies for Transmission Operations , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  Vijay Mann,et al.  CrossRoads: Seamless VM mobility across data centers through software defined networking , 2012, 2012 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium.

[9]  Kemal Akkaya,et al.  A survey of routing protocols for smart grid communications , 2012, Comput. Networks.

[10]  Petri Mähönen,et al.  TCP performance issues over wireless links , 2001, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[11]  Chuan Heng Foh,et al.  Opportunities for Software-Defined Networking in Smart Grid , 2013, 2013 9th International Conference on Information, Communications & Signal Processing.

[12]  Nick McKeown,et al.  A network in a laptop: rapid prototyping for software-defined networks , 2010, Hotnets-IX.

[13]  Chung-Horng Lung,et al.  A cost-effective protection and restoration mechanism for Ethernet based networks: an experiment report , 2004, 2004 Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing, 2004. HPSR..

[14]  R.E. Mackiewicz,et al.  Overview of IEC 61850 and Benefits , 2006, 2005/2006 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition.