The impact of a massive transfusion protocol on outcomes among patients with abdominal aortic injuries.

BACKGROUND Injuries of the abdominal aorta are uncommon and associated with a high mortality. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of an institutional massive transfusion protocol (MTP) on outcomes in patients with injuries of the abdominal aorta. METHODS A 12.5-year retrospective analysis of a Level 1 trauma center database to identify patients with abdominal aortic injuries was conducted. Demographics, associated injuries and severity, operative procedures, resuscitation requirements, and outcomes were compared among patients before and after implementation of an MTP. RESULTS Of the 46 patients with abdominal aortic injuries, 29 (63%) were in the pre-MTP group and 17 (37%) were in the post-MTP group. The mean age of the entire cohort was 32 ± 17 years and the two most common mechanisms of injury were gunshot wounds (63%) followed by motor vehicle collisions (24%). Thirteen patients (28%) underwent an emergency department thoracotomy and 11 patients (24%) sustained concomitant inferior vena cava injuries. There was a significant reduction in the volume of pre- and intraoperative crystalloids administered between the pre- and post-MTP groups. Intraoperatively, the use of tranexamic acid was increased in the post-MTP group (P < 0.001). A statistically significant difference in achievement of a low packed red blood cells to fresh frozen plasma ratio was observed for the post- versus the pre-MTP group (88% vs. 30%, P = 0.015). Overall survival was improved among post- versus pre-MTP patients (47% vs. 14%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Abdominal aortic injuries continue to represent a challenge and remain associated with a high mortality. Modern improvements in damage control resuscitation techniques including implementation of an institutional MTP may improve outcomes in patients with these injuries.

[1]  G. Rozycki,et al.  Improvements in early mortality and coagulopathy are sustained better in patients with blunt trauma after institution of a massive transfusion protocol in a civilian level I trauma center. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  Matthew J. Wall,et al.  Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. , 1994 .

[3]  M. Midwinter,et al.  Military Application of Tranexamic Acid in Trauma Emergency Resuscitation (MATTERs) Study. , 2012, Archives of surgery.

[4]  G. Rozycki,et al.  Changing patterns in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma: the more things change, the more they stay the same. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  G. Rozycki,et al.  Results with Abdominal Vascular Trauma in the Modern Era , 2001, The American surgeon.

[6]  B. Cotton,et al.  Predefined massive transfusion protocols are associated with a reduction in organ failure and postinjury complications. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  J. Michalek,et al.  Increased Plasma and Platelet to Red Blood Cell Ratios Improves Outcome in 466 Massively Transfused Civilian Trauma Patients , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[8]  J. Sperry,et al.  Massive transfusion: an evidence-based review of recent developments. , 2012, Archives of surgery.

[9]  R. Callcut,et al.  Effect of early plasma transfusion on mortality in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2010, Surgery.

[10]  L. Kraiss,et al.  Intraoperative blood product resuscitation and mortality in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2012, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  A. Peitzman,et al.  An FFP:PRBC transfusion ratio >/=1:1.5 is associated with a lower risk of mortality after massive transfusion. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  P. Rhee,et al.  Searching for the optimal resuscitation method: recommendations for the initial fluid resuscitation of combat casualties. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  A. Hirshberg.  Trauma damage control , 1997 .

[14]  B. Cotton,et al.  Damage control hematology: the impact of a trauma exsanguination protocol on survival and blood product utilization. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[15]  A. Carlin,et al.  Factors affecting mortality rates in patients with abdominal vascular injuries. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  N. Abumrad,et al.  THE CELLULAR, METABOLIC, AND SYSTEMIC CONSEQUENCES OF AGGRESSIVE FLUID RESUSCITATION STRATEGIES , 2006, Shock.

[17]  Edna C. Shenvi,et al.  Patient factors and operating room resuscitation predict mortality in traumatic abdominal aortic injury: a 20-year analysis. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  M. Rotondo,et al.  'Damage control': an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  A. McDonald,et al.  Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[20]  D. Feliciano,et al.  The impact of a massive transfusion protocol (1:1:1) on major hepatic injuries: does it increase abdominal wall closure rates? , 2013, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[21]  M. Rotondo,et al.  Damage control surgery: it's evolution over the last 20 years. , 2012, Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes.

[22]  M. Cohen,et al.  A paradigm shift in trauma resuscitation: evaluation of evolving massive transfusion practices. , 2013, JAMA surgery.

[23]  C. Ball.  Damage control resuscitation: history, theory and technique. , 2014, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[24]  E. Moore,et al.  Effect of damage control surgery on major abdominal vascular trauma. , 2012, The Journal of surgical research.

[25]  Kai Lu,et al.  Damage Control , 2012 .

[26]  David A Spain,et al.  Massive transfusion protocols: the role of aggressive resuscitation versus product ratio in mortality reduction. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[27]  W. Shoemaker,et al.  Operative management and outcome of 302 abdominal vascular injuries. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[28]  T. Zacharias,et al.  Outcome 1 year after digestive surgery in malnourished, elderly patients, with an emphasis on quality of life analysis. , 2013, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[29]  D. Hoyt,et al.  The ongoing challenge of retroperitoneal vascular injuries. , 1996, American journal of surgery.

[30]  D. Feliciano.  Chapter 146 – Abdominal Vascular Injury , 2004 .

[31]  Michal Abrahamowicz,et al.  Survival bias associated with time-to-treatment initiation in drug effectiveness evaluation: a comparison of methods. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.

[32]  D. Feliciano,et al.  Abdominal vascular injuries: injuries to the aorta. , 2001, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[33]  Richard L. George,et al.  The relationship of blood product ratio to mortality: survival benefit or survival bias? , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[34]  H. Alam,et al.  FLUID RESUSCITATION: PAST, PRESENT, AND THE FUTURE , 2010, Shock.