Counterfactual thinking, persistence, and performance: A test of the Reflection and Evaluation Model

The present research extends previous functional accounts of counterfactual thinking by incorporating the notion of reflective and evaluative processing. Participants generated counterfactuals about their anagram performance, after which their persistence and performance on a second set of anagrams was measured. Evaluative processing of upward counterfactuals elicited a larger increase in persistence and better performance than did reflective processing of upward counterfactuals, whereas reflective processing of downward counterfactuals elicited a larger increase in persistence and better performance than did evaluative processing of downward counterfactuals. Moreover, path analyses indicated that whereas the relationship between counterfactual thinking and persistence was accounted for by emotional responses following upward and downward counterfactual generation, the relationship between counterfactual thinking and performance was accounted for by enhanced persistence following reflective processing of downward counterfactuals, but was accounted for by both enhanced persistence and strategic thinking following evaluative processing of upward counterfactuals.

[1]  K. Markman,et al.  Downward Counterfactuals and Motivation: The Wake-Up Call and the Pangloss Effect , 2000 .

[2]  K. Markman,et al.  Reflective and evaluative modes of mental simulation , 2005 .

[3]  G. Oettingen,et al.  Self-regulation of goal setting: turning free fantasies about the future into binding goals. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Superstars and me : Predicting the impact of role models on the self , 1997 .

[5]  R. Collins.  For Better or Worse: The Impact of Upward Social Comparison on Self-Evaluations , 1996 .

[6]  L. Sanna,et al.  Rumination, imagination, and personality: Specters of the past and future in the present. , 2003 .

[7]  A. Garnham,et al.  Thinking and Reasoning , 1994 .

[8]  K. L. Marsh,et al.  Gaining Control through Counterfactual Thinking , 1999 .

[9]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[10]  K. Markman,et al.  The interplay between counterfactual reasoning and feedback dynamics in producing inferences about the self , 2007 .

[11]  K. Markman,et al.  Counterfactual thinking and regulatory fit , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.

[12]  L. Sanna,et al.  Virtue, vice, and personality : the complexity of behavior , 2003 .

[13]  Matthew N. McMullen.  Affective Contrast and Assimilation in Counterfactual Thinking , 1997 .

[14]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[15]  N. Roese.  The Functional Basis of Counterfactual Thinking , 1994 .

[16]  R. Wyer,et al.  Mood as Input: People Have to Interpret the Motivational Implications of Their Moods Moods and Processing , 2022 .

[17]  H. Wayment.  It Could Have Been Me: Vicarious Victims and Disaster-Focused Distress , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[18]  Sherry K. Schneider,et al.  Coping and the Simulation of Events , 1989 .

[19]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[20]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[21]  L. Sanna.  Defensive pessimism, optimism, and simulating alternatives: some ups and downs of prefactual and counterfactual thinking. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  K. Markman,et al.  The Mental Simulation of Better and Worse Possible Worlds , 1993 .

[23]  L. Sanna.  Mental Simulation, Affect, and Personality , 2000 .

[24]  E. Hirt,et al.  The Role of Mood in Quantitative and Qualitative Aspects of Performance: Single or Multiple Mechanisms? , 1997 .

[25]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Christian H. Jordan,et al.  Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  C. Parks,et al.  Retrospection in social dilemmas: how thinking about the past affects future cooperation. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  G. Oettingen.  Positive fantasy and motivation , 1996 .

[29]  D. Hilton,et al.  The Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking , 2005 .

[30]  J. Brockner,et al.  Value from hedonic experience and engagement. , 2006, Psychological review.

[31]  Jeff Joireman,et al.  Understanding behavior in the context of time : theory, research, and application , 2005 .

[32]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. , 1987 .

[33]  M. Ross,et al.  The motivational impact of temporal focus: thinking about the future and the past. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  I. Ritov,et al.  Decision Affect Theory: Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Risky Options , 1997 .

[35]  E. Higgins,et al.  Performance incentives and means: how regulatory focus influences goal attainment. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  K. Markman,et al.  A Reflection and Evaluation Model of Comparative Thinking , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[37]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[38]  Suzanne C. Segerstrom,et al.  Dispositional Optimism and Coping: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.