Fast versus slow response in climate change: implications for the global hydrological cycle

Recent studies have shown that changes in global mean precipitation are larger for solar forcing than for CO2 forcing of similar magnitude. In this paper, we use an atmospheric general circulation model to show that the differences originate from differing fast responses of the climate system. We estimate the adjusted radiative forcing and fast response using Hansen’s “fixed-SST forcing” method. Total climate system response is calculated using mixed layer simulations using the same model. Our analysis shows that the fast response is almost 40% of the total response for few key variables like precipitation and evaporation. We further demonstrate that the hydrologic sensitivity, defined as the change in global mean precipitation per unit warming, is the same for the two forcings when the fast responses are excluded from the definition of hydrologic sensitivity, suggesting that the slow response (feedback) of the hydrological cycle is independent of the forcing mechanism. Based on our results, we recommend that the fast and slow response be compared separately in multi-model intercomparisons to discover and understand robust responses in hydrologic cycle. The significance of this study to geoengineering is discussed.

[1]  B. Soden,et al.  Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming , 2006 .

[2]  W. Collins,et al.  The Formulation and Atmospheric Simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3) , 2006 .

[3]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  CO2 forcing induces semi‐direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations , 2008 .

[4]  Georgiy L. Stenchikov,et al.  Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections , 2008 .

[5]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[6]  Michael E. Schlesinger,et al.  Intensity of hydrological cycles in warmer climates , 2003 .

[7]  F. Wentz,et al.  How Much More Rain Will Global Warming Bring? , 2007, Science.

[8]  K. Taylor,et al.  Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Manoj Joshi,et al.  An alternative to radiative forcing for estimating the relative importance of climate change mechanisms , 2003 .

[10]  J. Hansen,et al.  Radiative forcing and climate response , 1997 .

[11]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  A new merged analysis of precipitation utilizing satellite and reanalysis data , 2008 .

[12]  M. Webb,et al.  Tropospheric Adjustment Induces a Cloud Component in CO2 Forcing , 2008 .

[13]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: The role of particle size , 2008 .

[14]  G. Huffman,et al.  Relationships between global precipitation and surface temperature on interannual and longer timescales (1979–2006) , 2008 .

[15]  R. Betts,et al.  Detection of a direct carbon dioxide effect in continental river runoff records , 2006, Nature.

[16]  L. K. Gohar,et al.  Radiative forcing by well-mixed greenhouse gases: Estimates from climate models in the Intergovernme , 2006 .

[17]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A Surface Energy Perspective on Climate Change , 2009 .

[18]  J. Hansen,et al.  Efficacy of climate forcings , 2005 .

[19]  F. Lambert,et al.  Tropospheric adjustment: The response of two general circulation models to a change in insolation , 2007 .

[20]  Paul J. Valdes,et al.  “Sunshade World”: A fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering , 2008 .

[21]  G. J. Collatz,et al.  Comparison of Radiative and Physiological Effects of Doubled Atmospheric CO2 on Climate , 1996, Science.

[22]  D. Pollard,et al.  Large-Scale Vegetation Feedbacks on a Doubled CO2 Climate , 2000 .

[23]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[24]  R. Nemani,et al.  Climate response to physiological forcing of carbon dioxide simulated by the coupled Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3.1) and Community Land Model (CLM3.0) , 2009 .

[25]  David Pollard,et al.  Potential high‐latitude vegetation feedbacks on CO2‐induced climate change , 1999 .

[26]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide , 2007, Nature.

[27]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Transient climate–carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.