Effects of attenuation correction and reconstruction method on PET activation studies

The outcome of Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) analyses of PET activation studies depends among others, on the quality of reconstructed data. In general, filtered back-projection (FBP) is used for reconstruction in PET activation studies. There is, however, increasing interest in iterative reconstruction algorithms such as ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithms. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of reconstruction techniques and attenuation correction (AC) on the detection of activation foci following statistical analysis with SPM. First, a replicate study was performed to assess the effects of the reconstruction method on pixel variance. Second, a phantom study was performed to evaluate the influence of both locations of an activated area and applied reconstruction method on SPM outcome. A volumetric method was used to compute the number of false positive voxels for all reconstructions. In addition, average t values within activation foci and for false positive voxels were calculated. For the assessment of the effects of reconstruction on clinical data, a group of 11 patients was studied. For all reconstructions SPM maps were created and compared. Both the clinical and the phantom data showed that use of iterative reconstruction methods reduced false positive results, while showing similar SPM results within activated areas as FBP. Reconstruction of data without attenuation correction reduced noise for FBP only, but did not affect the quality of SPM results for OSEM. It is concluded that OSEM is a good alternative for FBP reconstructions providing SPM results with less noise.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing Functional (PET) Images: The Assessment of Significant Change , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[2]  D. Townsend,et al.  The Theory and Practice of 3D PET , 1998, Developments in Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  R E Carson,et al.  Noise reduction in oncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction: a quantitative assessment. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[6]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Principles of computer assisted tomography (CAT) in radiographic and radioisotopic imaging , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  N C Andreasen,et al.  Tests for Comparing Images Based on Randomization and Permutation Methods , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[9]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 4. Effect of Accidental Coincidences , 1981, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  B. M. de Jong,et al.  Iterative versus Filtered Backprojection Reconstruction for Statistical Parametric Mapping of PET Activation Measurements: A Comparative Case Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[13]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  G Brix,et al.  Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  A study of bias for various iterative reconstruction methods in PET , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[16]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[17]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  A clinical perspective of accelerated statistical reconstruction , 1997, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Geurt Jongbloed,et al.  Experimental evaluation of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection for 3D [15O]water PET activation studies using statistical parametric mapping analysis , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Performance evaluation of the whole-body PET scanner ECAT EXACT HR + , 1997 .

[20]  S. Rauch,et al.  Functional MRI and the Study of OCD: From Symptom Provocation to Cognitive-Behavioral Probes of Cortico-Striatal Systems and the Amygdala , 1996, NeuroImage.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[22]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  Efficient scatter modelling for incorporation in maximum likelihood reconstruction , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  T. Spinks,et al.  Physical characteristics of the ECAT EXACT3D positron tomograph. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  V. Sossi,et al.  Quantitative comparison of three- and two-dimensional PET with human brain studies. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  Assessing the Performance of SPM Analyses of Spect Neuroactivation Studies , 2000, NeuroImage.

[27]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  FORE(J)+OSEM2D versus OSEM3D reconstruction for large aperture rotating LSO panel detector PET prototype , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[28]  V Sossi,et al.  A phantom study evaluating the quantitative aspect of 3D PET imaging of the brain. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.