Feedback and Revising in an Intelligent Tutoring System for Writing Strategies

This study investigates students’ essay revising in the context of an intelligent tutoring system called Writing Pal (W-Pal), which combines strategy instruction, game-based practice, essay writing practice, and automated formative feedback. We examine how high school students use W-Pal feedback to revise essays in two different contexts: a typical approach that emphasizes intensive writing practice, and an alternative approach that offers less writing practice with more direct strategy instruction. Results indicate that students who wrote fewer essays, but received W-Pal strategy instruction, were more likely to make substantive revisions that implemented specific recommendations conveyed by the automated feedback. Additional analyses consider the role of motivation and perceived learning on students’ revising behaviors.

[1]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Investigating Instruction for Improving Revision of Argumentative Essays , 2011 .

[2]  Jill Fitzgerald,et al.  Research on Revision in Writing , 1987 .

[3]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The Writing-Pal: Natural Language Algorithms to Support Intelligent Tutoring on Writing Strategies , 2012 .

[4]  N. Sommers Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers , 1980, College Composition & Communication.

[5]  Laura K. Allen,et al.  The Writing Pal Intelligent Tutoring System: Usability Testing and Development , 2014 .

[6]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Automated writing evaluation: defining the classroom research agenda , 2006 .

[7]  Lindy Crawford,et al.  Analysis of Student Revisions on a State Writing Test , 2008 .

[8]  Jill Burstein,et al.  Automated Essay Scoring : A Cross-disciplinary Perspective , 2003 .

[9]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Utility in a Fallible Tool: A Multi-Site Case Study of Automated Writing Evaluation. , 2010 .

[10]  Semire Dikli,et al.  An Overview of Automated Scoring of Essays. , 2006 .

[11]  Lillian S. Bridwell,et al.  Revising Strategies in Twelfth Grade Students’ Transactional Writing , 1980, Research in the Teaching of English.

[12]  Martin Chodorow,et al.  Automated Essay Evaluation: The Criterion Online Writing Service , 2004, AI Mag..

[13]  Danielle S McNamara,et al.  Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[14]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[15]  Stephen Graham,et al.  Explicitly Teaching Strategies, Skills, and Knowledge: Writing Instruction in Middle School Classrooms. , 2002 .

[16]  Margaret J. Johnson,et al.  Sources of Writing Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Elementary, Middle, and High School Students. , 2007 .

[17]  Paul Deane,et al.  COGNITIVE MODELS OF WRITING: WRITING PROFICIENCY AS A COMPLEX INTEGRATED SKILL , 2008 .

[18]  Yigal Attali,et al.  Exploring the Feedback and Revision Features of Criterion , 2004 .

[19]  Ekaterina Midgette,et al.  The effects of content and audience awareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth- and eighth-grade students , 2008 .